<![CDATA[Browns set a franchise record!]]>12th consecutive loss...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/44768/browns-set-a-franchise-recordRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 00:58:37 GMTSun, 06 Nov 2016 20:53:54 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 20:47:46 GMT]]>

@tour2ma said:

lol... have to admire your consistency, Gip...

How about... "for the first time in the franchise's NFL history..." ?

Just accurate facts. Not half assed facts.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/654454https://brownsboard.com/post/654454Mon, 14 Nov 2016 20:47:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 20:41:39 GMT]]>lol... have to admire your consistency, Gip...

How about... "for the first time in the franchise's NFL history..." ?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/654449https://brownsboard.com/post/654449Mon, 14 Nov 2016 20:41:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:05:22 GMT]]>

@wargograw said:

I believe last night dropped us to .500. One more to be under.

No, the dickwads that are saying this are not counting AAFC. The Browns are still far above .500.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/654344https://brownsboard.com/post/654344Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:05:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Sat, 12 Nov 2016 15:37:44 GMT]]>

@flyingfooldoug said:

But Dee has his balls

lol... forgot all about her involvement. Could be a calming influence...

"Jimmah, you survived a rebate investigation... you will survive 0-16 as well."

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/653722https://brownsboard.com/post/653722Sat, 12 Nov 2016 15:37:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Sat, 12 Nov 2016 11:58:55 GMT]]>

@texasag1969 said:

The real question will be this: If we go 0-16 how long will Jimmy be able to live with it?

The rest of us have only the popular vote, whereas Jimmy holds all the electoral votes. 😁

But Dee has his balls]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/653661https://brownsboard.com/post/653661Sat, 12 Nov 2016 11:58:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Sat, 12 Nov 2016 11:59:48 GMT]]>The real question will be this: If we go 0-16 how long will Jimmy be able to live with it?

The rest of us have only the popular vote, whereas Jimmy holds all the electoral votes. 😁

"Hue, you got some splainin' to do."

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/653660https://brownsboard.com/post/653660Sat, 12 Nov 2016 11:59:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Sat, 12 Nov 2016 10:58:59 GMT]]>

@wargograw said:

I believe last night dropped us to .y500. One more to be under.

Yep, worst ever! Worst fucking team, worst fucking owner, worst fucking head coach, worst fucking plan in the history of this once proud team. I wish DeeDee would fuck Jimmy in the ass till he's dead!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/653654https://brownsboard.com/post/653654Sat, 12 Nov 2016 10:58:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Sat, 12 Nov 2016 00:29:28 GMT]]>

@tour2ma said:

No, you heard right... but missed the fact that this is the first time in franchise history the franchise has ever been below .500...

Sorry, if it was better I'd left that added info unsaid.

I believe last night dropped us to .500. One more to be under.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/653578https://brownsboard.com/post/653578Sat, 12 Nov 2016 00:29:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:52:20 GMT]]>I swear I saw him actually get deep and free and catch a TD last nite... but I was drinking...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/653547https://brownsboard.com/post/653547Fri, 11 Nov 2016 22:52:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Fri, 11 Nov 2016 21:56:56 GMT]]>

@tour2ma said:

Ah... you mean like Devalve?

That cannon fodder was winged by birdshot, and hadn't played. 🙂

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/653533https://brownsboard.com/post/653533Fri, 11 Nov 2016 21:56:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:49:37 GMT]]>

@hoorta said:

After last night Tour- I don't need to see those practices- because if the bench cannon fodder was any better than the starting cannon fodder, it would be starting by now.....

Ah... you mean like Devalve?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/653517https://brownsboard.com/post/653517Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:49:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:48:15 GMT]]>

@browns52 said:

the insane thing is the browns now have a losing record since their inception in what...1950...they said it on tv last night...correct me if i am wrong..but me thinks that is what i heard...that is insane...poor otto and the rest of them...and jim brown wants to see a championship before he croaks...pfffft...good luck with that...err maybe if he lives to be 150...

No, you heard right... but missed the fact that this is the first time in franchise history the franchise has ever been below .500...

Sorry, if it was better I'd left that added info unsaid.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/653516https://brownsboard.com/post/653516Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:48:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:47:34 GMT]]>

@tour2ma said:

So potentially five starters? Sounds great... at least compared to past FOs...

As for the rest...

You can't say that, h. Sorry, but you can't, because unless you have been attending practices, then you have not seen enough of the "fodder" to make a judgement.

On a positive note three years.... this one plus two... seems about right.

After last night Tour- I don't need to see those practices- because if the bench cannon fodder was any better than the starting cannon fodder, it would be starting by now.....

Hey we're the "Best" at being the "Worst". LOL, just a thought- will the 2008 Lions break out the champagne if we win a game?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/653515https://brownsboard.com/post/653515Fri, 11 Nov 2016 20:47:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Fri, 11 Nov 2016 19:52:06 GMT]]>

@bbedward said:

12th consecutive loss...

the insane thing is the browns now have a losing record since their inception in what...1950...they said it on tv last night...correct me if i am wrong..but me thinks that is what i heard...that is insane...poor otto and the rest of them...and jim brown wants to see a championship before he croaks...pfffft...good luck with that...err maybe if he lives to be 150...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/653495https://brownsboard.com/post/653495Fri, 11 Nov 2016 19:52:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:41:22 GMT]]>

@mudfly said:

Coleman Kessler and Ogbah are the only 3 actually starting.....right now....Nassib and Schobert are off the bench.....Coleman aint happenin and is Ervings 2016 counterpart.....

And....my point wasnt necessarily that last years draft was better(I think they are very similar, actually)......but it was not the disaster so many claim it to be.......

Well....it may still turn out to be a disaster. No one is distinguishing themselves....at all. All of these guys look like backup NFL players at best.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/653382https://brownsboard.com/post/653382Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:41:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:05:05 GMT]]>Someone has to start... 😉

You're correct... Nassib is situational as well now, but did get a couple starts. #luxuryofriches

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/653161https://brownsboard.com/post/653161Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:05:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:51:43 GMT]]>

@tour2ma said:

Looks right... except for missing asterisk by Erving...

Of course only one of the next six is still with the team. 😛

2016 only lacks its 2nd Coleman to also start its 1st six... although Schobert is now 2nd team I believe.

Coleman Kessler and Ogbah are the only 3 actually starting.....right now....Nassib and Schobert are off the bench.....Coleman aint happenin and is Ervings 2016 counterpart.....

And....my point wasnt necessarily that last years draft was better(I think they are very similar, actually)......but it was not the disaster so many claim it to be.......

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/653155https://brownsboard.com/post/653155Thu, 10 Nov 2016 23:51:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Thu, 10 Nov 2016 19:48:47 GMT]]>Looks right... except for missing asterisk by Erving...

Of course only one of the next six is still with the team. 😛

@the-gipper said:

How about 2015 draft....with Shelton, Erving, Cooper, Orchard, Campbell, Johnson?

2016 only lacks its 2nd Coleman to also start its 1st six... although Schobert is now 2nd team I believe.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/653077https://brownsboard.com/post/653077Thu, 10 Nov 2016 19:48:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Thu, 10 Nov 2016 14:35:40 GMT]]>

@mudfly said:

Trivia question.....browns currently have 6 starters, all drafted in succession(first 6 picks in a row) the same draft......what year were they picked?

🙂

How about 2015 draft....with Shelton, Erving, Cooper, Orchard, Campbell, Johnson?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652940https://brownsboard.com/post/652940Thu, 10 Nov 2016 14:35:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:47:18 GMT]]>

@mjp28 said:

Rigged! I demand a recount!

.....oh wait it's true. 😮

Too bad early on the BROWNS had a few legitimate shots at a win and would have erased that ugly 0-9 , 1-8 or 2-7 just has a better ring to it.

Yep, but then if we see 0-10 without signs of improvement, what then? Bring in a LFL team?]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652887https://brownsboard.com/post/652887Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:47:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:55:38 GMT]]>

@bbedward said:

12th consecutive loss...

Rigged! I demand a recount!

.....oh wait it's true. 😮

Too bad early on the BROWNS had a few legitimate shots at a win and would have erased that ugly 0-9 , 1-8 or 2-7 just has a better ring to it.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652802https://brownsboard.com/post/652802Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:55:38 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:19:54 GMT]]>

@tour2ma said:

So potentially five starters? Sounds great... at least compared to past FOs...

Trivia question.....browns currently have 6 starters, all drafted in succession(first 6 picks in a row) the same draft......what year were they picked?

🙂

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652783https://brownsboard.com/post/652783Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:19:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Mon, 07 Nov 2016 18:46:24 GMT]]>

@hoorta said:

I just hope come next April, I don't hear... "the Cleveland Browns have traded the first overall pick for....."

Better brace yourself then. 🥷

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/651959https://brownsboard.com/post/651959Mon, 07 Nov 2016 18:46:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns set a franchise record! on Mon, 07 Nov 2016 18:15:07 GMT]]>

@hoorta said:

Here's the problem, even with all the picks we had- at this point it looks like we have three decent starters, Coleman, Ogbah, Nassib. Jury out on Kessler and Drango. Remainder is cannon fodder, injured, or definitely not ready for prime time. Pursuing this model will take us around three more drafts to get competitive, by that time Joe Thomas will be on the verge of retirement. Remains to be seen if Drango can fill those shoes.

So potentially five starters? Sounds great... at least compared to past FOs...

As for the rest...

You can't say that, h. Sorry, but you can't, because unless you have been attending practices, then you have not seen enough of the "fodder" to make a judgement.

On a positive note three years.... this one plus two... seems about right.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/651940https://brownsboard.com/post/651940Mon, 07 Nov 2016 18:15:07 GMT