<![CDATA[The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning....]]>They're clinging to the narrative hillary lost cause we werent ready yet for a woman. I wonder when, if ever, one of those clowns will step forward and acknowledge she shit the bed herelf. No one to blame but herself. Omalley would have beaten trump. I hope these people wake up and smell the consequences of skirting the rules so profoundly.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/44802/the-liberal-establishment-is-nauseating-this-morning....RSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 01:45:51 GMTWed, 09 Nov 2016 15:36:30 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 23:26:49 GMT]]>

@mjp28 said:

Actually both had extremely high negatives before the election and HRC had very high untrustworthy numbers.

That's what lost it for her. Now her husband was one of the best politicians ever!

He sucked ass.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652764https://brownsboard.com/post/652764Wed, 09 Nov 2016 23:26:49 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 23:24:56 GMT]]>

@gftchris said:

But this is how anti-intellectualism works. See also: "but pol pot was an atheist"

Those elitists and their damn book learnin

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652763https://brownsboard.com/post/652763Wed, 09 Nov 2016 23:24:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 17:20:22 GMT]]>

@calfoxwc said:

Cool. Say, Reagan and W. were two term presidents....well, what do ya know..... !!! (oh yeah, so was ObaMao)

Oh yeah Reagan and W both ran against Democratic Dumbasses (strictly politically speaking) that was when they couldn't get their act together for years. Carter was toast, Dukakis really? Among others, hey it happens. And George I ran into Clinton.

Reagan being a former actor turned politican turned out to be the right man at the right time Trump has that opportunity now to succeed or fail it's his turn.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652622https://brownsboard.com/post/652622Wed, 09 Nov 2016 17:20:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 17:04:35 GMT]]>

@mjp28 said:

I didn't brag the Clintons were smart merely stated that they were very smart and great politicians good enough to become a two term president, not an easy fete.

Smart ass? Yeah my wife tells me that all the time. 😆

Cool. Say, Reagan and W. were two term presidents....well, what do ya know..... !!! (oh yeah, so was ObaMao)

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652607https://brownsboard.com/post/652607Wed, 09 Nov 2016 17:04:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 17:02:05 GMT]]>Being smart in the clinton sense isnt something i give much adherence to. Its just like trump who learned how to game the system after being given a major head start by his father. The clintons learned to game their own system the same

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652605https://brownsboard.com/post/652605Wed, 09 Nov 2016 17:02:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:59:33 GMT]]>

@calfoxwc said:

ha. cheap shot. Your bloviating about the clintons being so smart... doesn't mean they were

great, wonderful, honest people.

My point stands, smart ass - you bragged in defense of the clintons because they were smart and brilliant.

doesn't mean diddley. that was my point. But, see? I just said you were smart........

I didn't brag the Clintons were smart merely stated that they were very smart and great politicians good enough to become a two term president, not an easy fete.

Smart ass? Yeah my wife tells me that all the time. 😆

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652603https://brownsboard.com/post/652603Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:59:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:47:13 GMT]]>ha. cheap shot. Your bloviating about the clintons being so smart... doesn't mean they were

great, wonderful, honest people.

My point stands, smart ass - you bragged in defense of the clintons because they were smart and brilliant.

doesn't mean diddley. that was my point. But, see? I just said you were smart........

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652583https://brownsboard.com/post/652583Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:47:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:42:25 GMT]]>I'll pass on Manson and Pol Pot as an extremely small part of the six billion people who inhabit the earth as worthy of a post electon talk.

Now if you like psychopaths that's another thread I guess.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652579https://brownsboard.com/post/652579Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:42:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:41:18 GMT]]>

@mjp28 said:

A lot of people are intelligent but a very, very, very small number of them are psychopathic killers. And it's no wonder with Manson's upbringing, ever see his bio?

yes, it's sick. It doesn't mean anything, but did you know both Bill Clinton and manson never knew their biological fathers?

Coincidence, just weird. "really smart" isn't a constant in goodness, was my only point. Not comparing the clintons to

murderers or anything.

(although, a lot of people have died around the Clintons.... very strange)

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652577https://brownsboard.com/post/652577Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:41:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:38:53 GMT]]>If a foreign power intervened in our election and decided hillary was whats best for us, and some folk got to bombing stuff......u people would be lauding them as great american heroes. It still amazes me that when people abroad react in similiar manner to western meddling they often get branded as terrorists. Guevera's a prime example. But no one wants to acknowledge what was going on in south america at thevtime, caused in large part by western influences, that drivevmen like guevera mad with rage

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652575https://brownsboard.com/post/652575Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:38:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:34:08 GMT]]>Manson killed people for pleasure. Ayers was protesting the vietnam war and american imperialism. Im not saying bombing buildings is the right call but at least ayers was dead on the money right about the vietnam war. Which incidentally president elect trump at least claims to be against such imperialist interventions

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652572https://brownsboard.com/post/652572Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:34:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:33:52 GMT]]>

@mjp28 said:

A lot of people are intelligent but a very, very, very small number of them are psychopathic killers. And it's no wonder with Manson's upbringing, ever see his bio?

But this is how anti-intellectualism works. See also: "but pol pot was an atheist"

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652571https://brownsboard.com/post/652571Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:33:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:33:04 GMT]]>

@calfoxwc said:

Charles manson was really intelligent. He was a criminal, too.

A lot of people are intelligent but a very, very, very small number of them are psychopathic killers. And it's no wonder with Manson's upbringing, ever see his bio?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652569https://brownsboard.com/post/652569Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:33:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:25:39 GMT]]>Charles manson was really intelligent. He was a criminal, too.

Search Results
Charles Manson: Extremely Intelligent - California State University ...

May 3, 2013 - The violent person that I chose was Charles Manson. He is probably one of the more well-known serial killers in history and is known for his ...

Bill Ayers - intelligent = but blew up buildings and killed people.....

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652561https://brownsboard.com/post/652561Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:25:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:22:11 GMT]]>

@bbedward said:

I'm not in a camp that thinks Bill Clinton was a good president, but he sure as fuck was a brilliant politician

Bill or Slick Willie from Hope, Arkansas was a very smart person (Rhodes Scholar) married a brilliant wife and knew how to work the system together with his campaign manager James Carville to beat George H.W. Bush who was a fine person but not in sync with 1990s voters.

Another master of that was Barak Obama both two term presidents.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652559https://brownsboard.com/post/652559Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:22:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:10:30 GMT]]>

@oldbrownsfan said:

My take was Clinton being president when the internet exploded with the dot coms and personal computers helped him as well as he did work across the aisle some with the republican congress and they got some things done. By the time Clinton left office the dot com bubble had burst and I believe Bush came into office with the country in recession.

Not to mention the fact that he had a Republican Senate and Congress most of his time. Bad news because of the Watergate investigation but good news for his legacy as they forced him into welfare reform Etc etc

wss

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652547https://brownsboard.com/post/652547Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:10:30 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:05:11 GMT]]>My take was Clinton being president when the internet exploded with the dot coms and personal computers helped him as well as he did work across the aisle some with the republican congress and they got some things done. By the time Clinton left office the dot com bubble had burst and I believe Bush came into office with the country in recession.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652544https://brownsboard.com/post/652544Wed, 09 Nov 2016 16:05:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:57:37 GMT]]>

@mjp28 said:

Now her husband was one of the best politicians ever!

I'm not in a camp that thinks Bill Clinton was a good president, but he sure as fuck was a brilliant politician

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652538https://brownsboard.com/post/652538Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:57:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:54:08 GMT]]>The elites in the democratic party got the candidate they wanted to win their nomination (with the help of the DNC and the super delegates). Not so with the republicans where the GOP elites were freaking out over Trump's win.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652534https://brownsboard.com/post/652534Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:54:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:53:22 GMT]]>

bbedward, on 09 Nov 2016 - 10:41 AM, said:

Nobody wants to admit she was a terrible candidate.

Actually both had extremely high negatives before the election and HRC had very high untrustworthy numbers.

That's what lost it for her. Now her husband was one of the best politicians ever!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652531https://brownsboard.com/post/652531Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:53:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:47:32 GMT]]>Im not sayong he should have trashed her thats notbthe best look on victory night, but then dont mention her...just say congrats o my opponent on running a close race.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652528https://brownsboard.com/post/652528Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:47:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:46:10 GMT]]>And frankly, after whats come out...fuck trump for his backpeddling during his victory speech. Oh she's fone an amazing job of service to our country blah blah....follow-up on ur rhetoric and prosecute her

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652527https://brownsboard.com/post/652527Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:46:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:43:11 GMT]]>And the fact this election was seemingly over two weeks ago isnt mentioned. Nobody wants to adress what came out

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652524https://brownsboard.com/post/652524Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:43:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The liberal establishment is nauseating this morning.... on Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:42:12 GMT]]>

@bbedward said:

Nobody wants to admit she was a terrible candidate.

Yes. Its amazing.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/652523https://brownsboard.com/post/652523Wed, 09 Nov 2016 15:42:12 GMT