<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Interesting QB Situation]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I know this has been hashed and rehashed ad nauseum, but this whole Ratliff addition is interesting to say the least. </p>

<p>
OK, so we are now told that Quinn was not available for trade during the draft. I believe that Quinn's value was at its highest last weekend, while Anderson's was at its lowest. And now we bring in Ratliff, who Mangini and Daboll really liked in NY. I have to imagine Ratliff will be the #2. However, if we wouldn't trade Quinn over the weekend for a potential #1 draft pick, it's clear that he's the starter and DA is odd man out, right? They could keep DA for a bit until a team becomes desperate d/t injury, and then we could try to snag a player out of the deal as opposed to a 2010 pick. All of this makes complete sense. </p>

<p>
But, here is the interesting twist: Ratliff is more of a DA QB than a Quinn QB. So, I ask, what kind of offense will we be running?? Stretch the field, DA/Ratliff offense? I cannot imagine us trading Quinn later on, as I still feel the best chance was last weekend. Then again, how much stock should we be really putting into the whole "stretching the field' thing? I mean, Quinn is in the NFL, he has to be able to throw the long ball accurately. Not to mention, one would have to imagine that by sticking with the 'intelligent player" approach, Quinn is also favored. But, this Ratliff thing is very intriguing to say the least. </p>

<p>
Also, if we keep both DA and Quinn, and Quinn starts, then we have close to $20 million wrapped up in 2 QB's.....$8 to DA, $11ish to Quinn after playing incentives, etc. If they do the "competition approach", then by naming a starter you devalue the appointed backup, especially if other teams got the chance to see one of them potentially suck in the pre-season. </p>

<p>
All in all, I believe Quinn is in and DA will be traded when his stock goes back up.....ie- when a team loses their starter this spring/summer and becomes real desperate, hopefully before too many pre-season games to see DA crap the bed.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/4487/interesting-qb-situation</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 04:26:40 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/4487.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:12:09 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Tue, 05 May 2009 13:36:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/jadbf" aria-label="Profile: jadbf">@<bdi>jadbf</bdi></a> said:</p>Lummy......I'm STILLLLL waiting for you to come back and show me all the "pick-6s to Shaun Rodgers" that Quinn threw last season....
<p>
Either that or for you to admit you make shit up to defend your girl DA....</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
Lumms has no more defense for DA after last season and willingly admitting he was toast himself.</p>
<p>
All he has left is slandering Quinn and everyone that wants to see if Quinn can or cannot be a real NFL qb.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/68629</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/68629</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tobalaz]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 13:36:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Tue, 05 May 2009 00:09:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/inspecta" aria-label="Profile: inspecta">@<bdi>inspecta</bdi></a> said:</p>If DA was really all that and a bag of chips one of two things would of happened.
<p>
1. EM would of named him starter right off the bat</p>

<p>
2. Teams would of called us about DA.</p>

<p>
Neither has happened. Sure you can say "you don't know that teams haven't called" but c'mon guys, this is a league built on things being leaked. Trade rumors swirl all around during the offseason, and not one involved DA.</p>

<p>
That's because nobody wants him, because nobody is desperate enough for him (yet)</p>

<p>
Let's hope some other teams have some serious injuries at the QB position that will make them desperate to take him on the fly.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
This.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/68506</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/68506</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[FRIZBIZ]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 00:09:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Mon, 04 May 2009 18:21:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/drunkandstoopid" aria-label="Profile: drunkandstoopid">@<bdi>drunkandstoopid</bdi></a> <a href="/post/68465">said</a>:</p>Why not?  Coming off a preseason that he really didn't play or practice because of a concussion, and starting when he probably shouldn't have... his QB rating sucked.  His last four games before the demotion actually were for the most part pretty reasonable, definitely on an upward "trend".
<p>
Anyway, the whole "trend" theory is a bunch of hooey.  You have to look at the situations, the receivers, what the rest of the team is also doing to really evaluate how a QB affects  or doesn't affect a game.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
Are you really gonna use the preseason excuse?  What did DA do again during the 2007 preseason?  An upward trend on his last four starts?  More like a continuation of the scatter shot DA is.  From one week to another you get something different.  That's a trend.</p>

<p>
By the way, DA did practice and watch film during camp after the concussion.  Just not out doors because of light.  He wasn't sitting around doing nothing.  </p>

<p>
You can say it's a bunch of hooey, but coaches and scouts around the NFL will tell you otherwise.  Or has the situation week to week from HS to today really been varying that greatly?  I don't think so.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/68470</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/68470</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Masters]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 18:21:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Mon, 04 May 2009 18:16:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/drunkandstoopid" aria-label="Profile: drunkandstoopid">@<bdi>drunkandstoopid</bdi></a> <a href="/post/68465">said</a>:</p>Why not?  Coming off a preseason that he really didn't play or practice because of a concussion, and starting when he probably shouldn't have... his QB rating sucked.  His last four games before the demotion actually were for the most part pretty reasonable, definitely on an upward "trend".
<p>
Anyway, the whole "trend" theory is a bunch of hooey.  You have to look at the situations, the receivers, what the rest of the team is also doing to really evaluate how a QB affects  or doesn't affect a game.</p>
</blockquote>


<p>
So you're blaming his suckitude on the preseason concussion?</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/68468</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/68468</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[AdaM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 18:16:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Mon, 04 May 2009 18:14:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Masters <a href="/post/68460">said</a>:</p>Shhhh.... we wouldn't want to bring up DA's trends when it comes to QB rating.</blockquote>
<p>
Why not?  Coming off a preseason that he really didn't play or practice because of a concussion, and starting when he probably shouldn't have... his QB rating sucked.  His last four games before the demotion actually were for the most part pretty reasonable, definitely on an upward "trend".</p>

<p>
Anyway, the whole "trend" theory is a bunch of hooey.  You have to look at the situations, the receivers, what the rest of the team is also doing to really evaluate how a QB affects  or doesn't affect a game.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/68465</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/68465</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Drunkandstoopid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 18:14:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Mon, 04 May 2009 18:06:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/dan-in-florida" aria-label="Profile: dan-in-florida">@<bdi>dan-in-florida</bdi></a> <a href="/post/68458">said</a>:</p>Rather than completion percentage, I actually, I <b>PREFER </b>to go by the "<b>QB Rating</b>" which takes INT's into account (which are game changers).  I think it is WAY more relevant.</blockquote>

<p>
Shhhh.... we wouldn't want to bring up DA's trends when it comes to QB rating.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/68460</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/68460</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Masters]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 18:06:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Mon, 04 May 2009 18:11:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Rather than completion percentage, I actually <b>PREFER </b>to go by the "<b>QB Rating</b>" which takes INT's into account (which are game changers).  I think it is WAY more relevant.</p>

<p>
I just want to win games regardless who the QB is.  I just happen to know DA is not the guy.  If Ratliff ends up a winning QB for us...fantastic!</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/68458</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/68458</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan in Florida]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 18:11:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Mon, 04 May 2009 18:03:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/ballpeen" aria-label="Profile: ballpeen">@<bdi>ballpeen</bdi></a> <a href="/post/68443">said</a>:</p>I agree, and that is one thing that has bothered me about Quinn, though it is way to early to tell if it is a trend.  He was looking a lot like Couch with the dump passes.
<p>
I think as he feels the job is his, which up to this point I don't think he ever really felt that way, he will start looking to put the ball down the field rather than jump to the bailout toss to early.</p>

<p>
I would rather see some picks then see 3 passes for 7 yards like we did with Slouch.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
That's the real decision the coaches have to make.  Do they want an offense that has a chance to score quickly, or one that grinds it out a few yards at a time.  It's easy to have a good completion percentage if you dump it all the time, heck Charlie Fry had a 64% completion rate in his big 4 win (one of which was a comeback led by DA) season for the Browns.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/68456</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/68456</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Drunkandstoopid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 18:03:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Mon, 04 May 2009 18:00:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/drunkandstoopid" aria-label="Profile: drunkandstoopid">@<bdi>drunkandstoopid</bdi></a> <a href="/post/68440">said</a>:</p>Go back and read the original post.  It was stated that the only time Quinn ever reached the 50% mark was against the worst defense in the league.
<p>
Also, you are once again making inaccurate statements about DA.  He's had sub 50% games once in '06, and 4 times in each '07 and '08.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
I mis-read.  My bad.</p>

<p>
Last year, 3 games of sub 50%, 2 at 51/52%, and 1 at 56%.  So 6 of his 9 starts he was sub-par by NFL standards.  In 2007 3 at below 50%, 2 at 51%, 3 at 55%.  So that is 8 of his 15 starts that are sub-par by NFL standards.  In 2006 1 at sub 50% and 1 at 56%.  So 2 of his 3 were sub-par by NFL standards.  Put that all together an you have 16 of his 27 NFL starts are sub-par when it comes to completing passes.  That's a trend, and a very bad one.  Heck, you look at year one as the named starter to year 2 and he got worse, not better.  That is the problem with DA.  This is also his trend since HS.</p>

<p>
Then look at him by half and last 2 minutes of halfs.  Last year he got worse from the 1st half of games to the 2nd half (52% to 49%).  In the last two minutes of a half he is 32%.  In 2007 he wasn't all that much better either.  He is who he is, and it isn't good enough to be a middle tier QB in the NFL.  That is not acceptable.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/68453</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/68453</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Masters]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 18:00:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Mon, 04 May 2009 17:43:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/ballpeen" aria-label="Profile: ballpeen">@<bdi>ballpeen</bdi></a> <a href="/post/68443">said</a>:</p>I agree, and that is one thing that has bothered me about Quinn, though it is way to early to tell if it is a trend.  He was looking a lot like Couch with the dump passes.
<p>
I think as he feels the job is his, which up to this point I don't think he ever really felt that way, he will start looking to put the ball down the field rather than jump to the bailout toss to early.</p>

<p>
I would rather see some picks then see 3 passes for 7 yards like we did with Slouch.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
Could his finger had been bothering him? I don't know.</p>

<p>
I agree though. He was dumping it off an awful lot.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/68451</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/68451</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Oldcrow1945]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 17:43:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Mon, 04 May 2009 17:07:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote>I want to see him going downfield with consistent accuracy.</blockquote>

<p>
I agree, and that is one thing that has bothered me about Quinn, though it is way to early to tell if it is a trend.  He was looking a lot like Couch with the dump passes.</p>

<p>
I think as he feels the job is his, which up to this point I don't think he ever really felt that way, he will start looking to put the ball down the field rather than jump to the bailout toss to early.</p>

<p>
I would rather see some picks then see 3 passes for 7 yards like we did with Slouch.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/68443</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/68443</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[ballpeen]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 17:07:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Mon, 04 May 2009 17:06:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/drunkandstoopid" aria-label="Profile: drunkandstoopid">@<bdi>drunkandstoopid</bdi></a> <a href="/post/68441">said</a>:</p>Go back a year.... 37.5% baby! And the fans were chanting BRADY,BRADY,BRADY!!!</blockquote>
<p>
Pretty sure he only threw 8 passes, dipshit.  And TWO of them were dropped, in the END-ZONE.</p>



<p>
are you Derek Anderson or something?</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/68442</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/68442</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[AdaM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 17:06:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Mon, 04 May 2009 17:02:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/pl4tinum" aria-label="Profile: pl4tinum">@<bdi>pl4tinum</bdi></a> <a href="/post/68438">said</a>:</p>For the sake of even more accuracy, Quinn only played one game without an injury, oh!  Just happened to be that 65.7% completion rate game.</blockquote>

<p>
Go back a year.... 37.5% baby! And the fans were chanting BRADY,BRADY,BRADY!!!</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/68441</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/68441</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Drunkandstoopid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 17:02:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Mon, 04 May 2009 17:00:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Masters <a href="/post/68435">said</a>:</p>Ah, but not what I responded to.  It was stated that when he played the worst D, he couldn't complete 50%.  What happened in the other two starts, well he broke his finger early in that second start.  
<p>
Sub 50% do make up the majority of DA's starts.  You don't have a career 50 some odd % average by being over that number regularly.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
Go back and read the original post.  It was stated that the only time Quinn ever reached the 50% mark was against the worst defense in the league.</p>

<p>
Also, you are once again making inaccurate statements about DA.  He's had sub 50% games once in '06, and 4 times in each '07 and '08.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/68440</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/68440</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Drunkandstoopid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 17:00:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Mon, 04 May 2009 16:47:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/drunkandstoopid" aria-label="Profile: drunkandstoopid">@<bdi>drunkandstoopid</bdi></a> <a href="/post/68052">said</a>:</p>For the sake of accuracy... Brady Quinn's only game where he reached at least a 50% completion rate.  His second best game was 44.4%, his other games were below 40%
<p>
Also for the sake of accuracy... In regular season DA has had games of 71.9% against Baltimore, 72% against Miami, 72% against Seattle, 68.6% against Houston, as well as numerous other 60%+ games.  His sub 50% games do not make up half or the majority of his games.  If you want to compare early DA against BQ, DA only had one sub 50% game in his first 4 appearances with the Baltimore game mentioned earlier being among those early games.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
For the sake of even more accuracy, Quinn only played one game without an injury, oh!  Just happened to be that 65.7% completion rate game.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/68438</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/68438</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[pl4tinum]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 16:47:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Mon, 04 May 2009 16:32:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/drunkandstoopid" aria-label="Profile: drunkandstoopid">@<bdi>drunkandstoopid</bdi></a> <a href="/post/68052">said</a>:</p>For the sake of accuracy... Brady Quinn's only game where he reached at least a 50% completion rate.  His second best game was 44.4%, his other games were below 40%
<p>
Also for the sake of accuracy... In regular season DA has had games of 71.9% against Baltimore, 72% against Miami, 72% against Seattle, 68.6% against Houston, as well as numerous other 60%+ games.  His sub 50% games do not make up half or the majority of his games.  If you want to compare early DA against BQ, DA only had one sub 50% game in his first 4 appearances with the Baltimore game mentioned earlier being among those early games.</p>

<p>
To the other guys.  I actually hope Mangini makes his decision by mid summer and gets on with whatever his plans are.  If he chooses DA there will be a LOT of whining on this board that BQ didn't get a chance. If they dump DA and pick BQ, hopefully both guys will get a full preseason in with their respective teams... last year BQ pretty much got that, between the stupid Frye competition in '07 and the concussion in '08, DA's never got that.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
Ah, but not what I responded to.  It was stated that when he played the worst D, he couldn't complete 50%.  What happened in the other two starts, well he broke his finger early in that second start.  </p>

<p>
Sub 50% do make up the majority of DA's starts.  You don't have a career 50 some odd % average by being over that number regularly.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/68435</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/68435</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Masters]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 16:32:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Sat, 02 May 2009 18:28:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Aloysius <a href="/post/67388">said</a>:</p>If DA gets traded, you know all the DA fans are going to become Ratliff's biggest supporters. So I'll give them their first piece of semi-ridiculous evidence: 
<p>
As it turns out, Ratliff and Quinn faced Georgia Tech in back to back games: Ratliff in the '05 Fiesta Bowl, Quinn in the opening game of the '06 season. Here are the two guys' stats.</p>

<p>
<b>Brett Ratliff</b></p>
<ul><li>30/41, 381 yards, 4 TD, 1 INT</li></ul><b>Brady Quinn</b><ul><li>23/38, 246 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT</li></ul>Clearly, Ratliff is the better QB.</blockquote>

<p>
Maybe then the argument would start with something like, you must be kidding comparing apples and oranges.  You're talking two different seasons.  But, since Quinn can't win big games, Ratliff must be the beter QB.  Hell, look at Harrell's stats, he should be starting ahead of everybody.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/68065</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/68065</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[YtownBrownsBacker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 18:28:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Sat, 02 May 2009 18:51:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Masters <a href="/post/67988">said</a>:</p>Um, the worst pass D Quinn faced was DEN.  It wasn't a 50% completion %, it was 65.7%.  To put that in perspective for you, that is a career high for DA.</blockquote>
<p>
For the sake of accuracy... Brady Quinn's only game where he reached at least a 50% completion rate.  His second best game was 44.4%, his other games were below 40%</p>

<p>
Also for the sake of accuracy... In regular season DA has had games of 71.9% against Baltimore, 72% against Miami, 72% against Seattle, 68.6% against Houston, as well as numerous other 60%+ games.  His sub 50% games do not make up half or the majority of his games.  If you want to compare early DA against BQ, DA only had one sub 50% game in his first 4 appearances with the Baltimore game mentioned earlier being among those early games.</p>

<p>
To the other guys.  I actually hope Mangini makes his decision by mid summer and gets on with whatever his plans are.  If he chooses DA there will be a LOT of whining on this board that BQ didn't get a chance. If they dump DA and pick BQ, hopefully both guys will get a full preseason in with their respective teams... last year BQ pretty much got that, between the stupid Frye competition in '07 and the concussion in '08, DA's never got that.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/68052</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/68052</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Drunkandstoopid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 18:51:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Sat, 02 May 2009 15:52:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/drunkandstoopid" aria-label="Profile: drunkandstoopid">@<bdi>drunkandstoopid</bdi></a> <a href="/post/67411">said</a>:</p>I'm all for giving him a chance to win the spot in an open competition.  Totally for that.  Some of you guys are so fearful that he can't win it you want the job handed to him.</blockquote>
<p>
Ha ha, this is perhaps the funniest of the Manwagon lines.</p>

<p>
D&amp;S, do me a favor, comb the board (Spaceballs flash; giant pick in the desert... haha...sorry...) and find me JUST ONE POST that states that Quinn should be "handed" the job.</p>

<p>
You can't, because it's not here.</p>

<p>
What "some" have actually said -- myself included -- is that it's a waste of time to hold a QB competition, and possibly detrimental to the team's preparation, unless the coach REALLY doesn''t have a clue who he wants to start.</p>

<p>
And if he REALLY doesn't know who he wants to start then you have much bigger problems than the QB. Remember how RAC did this very thing?</p>

<p>
So, it's not about fear of Quinn failing, it's about fear that Mangini doesn't ACTUALLY know who his QB is.</p>

<p>
Does Mangini strike you as the flip-a-coin type?</p>

<p>
Yeah, me neither. Which is bad news for your boy.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/68022</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/68022</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[damajuki]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 15:52:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Sat, 02 May 2009 13:26:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/drunkandstoopid" aria-label="Profile: drunkandstoopid">@<bdi>drunkandstoopid</bdi></a> <a href="/post/67390">said</a>:</p>And Quinn racked up his only 50% completion NFL performance against the worst pass defense in the league, still lost.
<p>
If you want to cherry pick DA, the same can be done for BQ.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
Um, the worst pass D Quinn faced was DEN.  It wasn't a 50% completion %, it was 65.7%.  To put that in perspective for you, that is a career high for DA.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/67988</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/67988</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Masters]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 13:26:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Sat, 02 May 2009 13:23:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/lumbergh" aria-label="Profile: lumbergh">@<bdi>lumbergh</bdi></a> <a href="/post/67315">said</a>:</p>In a related topic, 2 out of 2, or ONE HUNDRED PERCENT of BQ's TD passes came against what Colin Cowherd called yesterday THE WORST DEFENSE IN THE NFL.  With 5 linebackers and a corner out with injuries.</blockquote>

<p>
He also called DA one of the worst starting QBs before the start of last season.  I like your choice of sources.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/67987</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/67987</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Masters]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 13:23:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:20:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/inspecta" aria-label="Profile: inspecta">@<bdi>inspecta</bdi></a> said:</p>Yes, he plummeted all the way to the......1st round!?!
<p>
Uh huh,yeah we definitely shouldn't give a 1st round pick a chance.....brilliant!!</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
I'm all for giving him a chance to win the spot in an open competition.  Totally for that.  Some of you guys are so fearful that he can't win it you want the job handed to him.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/67411</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/67411</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Drunkandstoopid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:20:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:19:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>And Quinn had questions about his accuracy under pressure coming out of college, his pro day at Notre Dame impressed scouts and coaches so much his draft stock plummeted.   If Quinn gets to play, somewhere, you just might see more of the same.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/67398</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/67398</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Drunkandstoopid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:19:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting QB Situation on Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:56:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/pl4tinum" aria-label="Profile: pl4tinum">@<bdi>pl4tinum</bdi></a> <a href="/post/67303">said</a>:</p>Anderson racked up about 50% of his TD passes against three teams that hadn't won a single game that year at the time that we played them (</blockquote>

<p>
And Quinn racked up his only 50% completion NFL performance against the worst pass defense in the league, still lost.</p>

<p>
If you want to cherry pick DA, the same can be done for BQ.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/67390</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/67390</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Drunkandstoopid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 18:56:10 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>