<![CDATA[So about those recounts...]]>Seems likely to be a waste of time to me, but what the hell. It would be earth shattering if any of the states were overturned, let alone all three to hand victory to Clinton.

Meanwhile some college delegates have said they're going to (try to) vote against their state's popular vote because 'it's the job of the electoral college to safeguard against blah blah blah'.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/44968/so-about-those-recounts...RSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 06:48:58 GMTSat, 26 Nov 2016 09:54:22 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Wed, 30 Nov 2016 06:09:25 GMT]]>YAY ! A Wisconsin real judge told Jill Franen Stein "NO RECOUNT BY HAND".

which was a ploy to have it take longer - a lot longer, and be far more expensive.

demowackic helter-skelton out of anger of losing, despite being "entitled to win because they are so ..special"

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2016/11/29/wisconsin-judge-rules-recount-by-hand-isnt-necessary/

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/659070https://brownsboard.com/post/659070Wed, 30 Nov 2016 06:09:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Wed, 30 Nov 2016 05:42:06 GMT]]>15192540_1188710897844452_40259590638122

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/659060https://brownsboard.com/post/659060Wed, 30 Nov 2016 05:42:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Wed, 30 Nov 2016 02:22:58 GMT]]>stein-recount_large.jpg

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/659022https://brownsboard.com/post/659022Wed, 30 Nov 2016 02:22:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Tue, 29 Nov 2016 20:06:48 GMT]]>

@pumpkin-eater said:

It's too late for a recount in PA

Yea but a law suit can still be filed to try to get one or something something.

Also Jill Stein just said the Wisconsin recounts are going to cost $3 million, more than the anticipated $1 million. In other words, give me more money because I want marble floors in my beach house.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/658946https://brownsboard.com/post/658946Tue, 29 Nov 2016 20:06:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Tue, 29 Nov 2016 17:14:15 GMT]]>It's too late for a recount in PA

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/658893https://brownsboard.com/post/658893Tue, 29 Nov 2016 17:14:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:22:34 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

😁

I hope I can f*** Jennifer Aniston.

WSS

Me too it would be awesome!]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/658870https://brownsboard.com/post/658870Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:22:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:17:34 GMT]]>back to the recounts...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/658868https://brownsboard.com/post/658868Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:17:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:04:35 GMT]]>

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/658858https://brownsboard.com/post/658858Tue, 29 Nov 2016 16:04:35 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:56:47 GMT]]>I really love this one. Idiots laughing at Trump running and winning...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/658856https://brownsboard.com/post/658856Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:56:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:51:46 GMT]]>so, soros is involved in funding, and the green candidate - she was convinced to do the

recount, so the higgardly camp wouldn't look like hypocrites and be made to look like the fools they were.

if Trump wins, they were fearing that they'd face legal prosecution.

which is obivous to do, when you are freaking corrupt and breaking laws.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/658845https://brownsboard.com/post/658845Tue, 29 Nov 2016 15:51:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:00:28 GMT]]>

@gftchris said:

Well you'd hope they're independent...

😁

I hope I can f*** Jennifer Aniston.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/658387https://brownsboard.com/post/658387Mon, 28 Nov 2016 18:00:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:56:00 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

By the way who controls the election boards (IOW Republicans Or democrats) in Wisconsin or any other state in which there will be a cry for a recount?

WSS

Well you'd hope they're independent...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/658257https://brownsboard.com/post/658257Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:56:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:36:47 GMT]]>By the way who controls the election boards (IOW Republicans Or democrats) in Wisconsin or any other state in which there will be a cry for a recount?

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/658251https://brownsboard.com/post/658251Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:36:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:11:46 GMT]]>Oh sure it's probably a flip flop even though I maintain it's just over the top campaign rhetoric but fair enough. Like I said I don't care.

It's just part of the Litany of the left which includes hey he's not really going to build a wall and hey he's not going to completely rescind Obamacare.

Plus if the DNC it really set that s*** up that's some serious dirt.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/658226https://brownsboard.com/post/658226Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:11:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:58:54 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

Frankly if it could be proved that the DNC set up any of these phony claims of groping or sexual misconduct I'd like to see those people locked up.

WSS

I'm not sure about locked up but certainly have nothing to do with politics and be punished in some way.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/658223https://brownsboard.com/post/658223Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:58:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:58:13 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

Well as for myself I didn't take a lot of the election rhetoric seriously. Don't care if they lock Hillary up or not.

Most of the talk of flip-flops is by the left trying to taint the election results.

She's probably no longer really a threat, so what would be the point?

"...talk of flip-flops is by the left trying to taint the election results."

Erm, what? Trump then: "If I win, I am going to instruct my attorney general to get a special prosecutor to look into your situation"

Trump now: β€œIt’s just not something that I feel very strongly about. ... I think it would be very, very divisive for the country.”

What is that if not a flip flop? As even OBF called it. Perhaps flip flop is too pejorative a term - how about "campaign to presidency policy streamlining"?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/658222https://brownsboard.com/post/658222Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:58:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:51:16 GMT]]>Frankly if it could be proved that the DNC set up any of these phony claims of groping or sexual misconduct I'd like to see those people locked up.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/658219https://brownsboard.com/post/658219Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:51:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:50:04 GMT]]>

@gftchris said:

Maybe, but would Trump want to flip flop on his flip flop?

Well as for myself I didn't take a lot of the election rhetoric seriously. Don't care if they lock Hillary up or not.

Most of the talk of flip-flops is by the left trying to taint the election results.

She's probably no longer really a threat, so what would be the point?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/658218https://brownsboard.com/post/658218Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:50:04 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:33:13 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

Yes that's what I thought about Nixon. Of course pardoning Hillary, you may well not even be prosecuted, should put a stink on the clintons and the Democrats for a good long time whether there's anything she could be charged with or not.

Until she hooked up with Jill Stein for this recount horseshit I don't think the Republicans had much interest in f****** with her. Maybe this is change things.

WSS

Maybe, but would Trump want to flip flop on his flip flop?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/658207https://brownsboard.com/post/658207Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:33:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:14:07 GMT]]>Not to mention that by the time Trump takes office our current justice department, if you call it that, will have had plenty of time to completely sanitized whatever evidence there might have been against Hillary.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/658197https://brownsboard.com/post/658197Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:14:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:11:47 GMT]]>

@dste-ace said:

Proclamation 4311 gave Richard Nixon a full and unconditional pardon for any crimes he might have committed

against the United States while president...

Historians believe the controversy was one of the major reasons Ford lost the election in 1976, an observation with

which Ford agreed.

Obama doesn't have to worry about another election, and for that reason alone I believe that before leaving office he

will give HRC a full and unconditional pardon as a final 'Fuck You' to Republicans.

Yes that's what I thought about Nixon. Of course pardoning Hillary, you may well not even be prosecuted, should put a stink on the clintons and the Democrats for a good long time whether there's anything she could be charged with or not.

Until she hooked up with Jill Stein for this recount horseshit I don't think the Republicans had much interest in f****** with her. Maybe this is change things.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/658196https://brownsboard.com/post/658196Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:11:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:06:23 GMT]]>Proclamation 4311 gave Richard Nixon a full and unconditional pardon for any crimes he might have committed

against the United States while president...

Historians believe the controversy was one of the major reasons Ford lost the election in 1976, an observation with

which Ford agreed.

Obama doesn't have to worry about another election, and for that reason alone I believe that before leaving office he

will give HRC a full and unconditional pardon as a final 'Fuck You' to Republicans.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/658195https://brownsboard.com/post/658195Mon, 28 Nov 2016 12:06:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:08:09 GMT]]>

@mld-woody said:

When he's president will Trump still be allowed to have a Twitter Account?

Still? Has he been allowed back in to his account now then?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/658185https://brownsboard.com/post/658185Mon, 28 Nov 2016 11:08:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So about those recounts... on Mon, 28 Nov 2016 04:22:12 GMT]]>I don't believe Richard M Nixon was convicted of anything but he was pardoned by Gerald Ford.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/658145https://brownsboard.com/post/658145Mon, 28 Nov 2016 04:22:12 GMT