<![CDATA[Camp Allen]]>Took my time this weekend going over film from middle to back half of 2015, and now the bulk of 2016. Generally I like to wait for bowl games, but I feel this might be one of the uncommon times

where I settle on my target. Allow me to clarify, I have no issues with Myles Garrett. But something in my bones is telling me I feel Allen to be the more steady pick of the two. Not unlike the differences in how Amari Cooper and Kevin White were viewed around here.

The Church of Allen welcomes all, dear friends. Discuss.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/45200/camp-allenRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 14:44:15 GMTMon, 19 Dec 2016 19:00:05 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:18:17 GMT]]>

@flyingfooldoug said:

The jeweler or the pervert?

hahaha

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/665351https://brownsboard.com/post/665351Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:18:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:03:42 GMT]]>

@wargograw said:

But people will say that someone moving up for a QB proves there is a QB worth taking in this draft. And most agree that if there is one, we should take him.

When the Niners move up, it means if you've done the opposite you're 99% certain to be doing it right.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/665087https://brownsboard.com/post/665087Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:03:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 20:52:54 GMT]]>

@tour2ma said:

He went to Jarod?

The jeweler or the pervert?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/664859https://brownsboard.com/post/664859Tue, 20 Dec 2016 20:52:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 20:14:10 GMT]]>

@clevfan4life said:

Ok so looking at the keyboard ic that the "e" is on the other side from "o".....so u really think that name is spelled with an "o"? Srsly? And dont claim typo ive already closed the investigation on that

He went to Jarod?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/664855https://brownsboard.com/post/664855Tue, 20 Dec 2016 20:14:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 20:11:33 GMT]]>

@tiamat63 said:

Wait....what?

Ummmm... that's my line...

@clevfan4life said:

Our o line is min 2 years away from being able to keep a rookie from dying before our 1st bye week. So im in no mood for a QB with the 1st pick

Agree with the conclusion even tho I disagree with the premise. If healthy, I see the needed OL talent already on our roster... and we can add better depth, if we are willing to make a hard choice with a big contract... something our FO has demonstrated it is willing to do.

Add that we have good PassPro RBs. TEs that can block? OK... a little help there is warranted.

@wargograw said:

But people will say that someone moving up for a QB proves there is a QB worth taking in this draft. And most agree that if there is one, we should take him.

And if we take one, people will say there wasn't one worth taking... people will question whatever we do... even if we take the consensus BAA (Best Aggie Available) in the draft, "people" will find a way to question it.

Trade ups, like any pick, only define a player's value for one team. Miami defined Tannehill's value and was pretty much high, and alone, in doing it. WSH did the same for RG3... Philly for Wentz... only difference was more saw the logic in the WSH and PHI examples.

In a smaller stakes way, we did the same for Kess. He just did not cost us added picks...

... as did Wheezy...

... and Quinn...

... and JFF...

... and...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/664854https://brownsboard.com/post/664854Tue, 20 Dec 2016 20:11:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:36:58 GMT]]>

@jiggins7919 said:

Fallible is what he meant. "capable of making mistakes or being erroneous."

Yes, I discerned that already ty.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/664749https://brownsboard.com/post/664749Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:36:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:18:47 GMT]]>Fallible is what he meant. "capable of making mistakes or being erroneous."

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/664742https://brownsboard.com/post/664742Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:18:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:15:57 GMT]]>

@clevfan4life said:

Faulable? Im trying to make you faulable?

Ok. Can anyone help me out here?

Laafuble?]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/664738https://brownsboard.com/post/664738Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:15:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:11:53 GMT]]>Allen and trubisky would be a hell of a draft

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/664735https://brownsboard.com/post/664735Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:11:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:06:51 GMT]]>The Eagles' pick is actually sliding further down, and if the right teams WIN, and THEY lose, we could be the luckiest team in the universe (about time) and theoretically have the 1st and 5th pick of the first round. I'll have to check once again to see who everyone plays in order to determine the exact outcome scenarios, but a few 5 win teams won, and they are now behind the Eagles. After watching the Eagles, I don't really see them losing out, but they do play the Giants and Cowboys to finish the year, and they are favored to lose in both. The Cowboy game is interesting because I don't think the Boys NEED to win to improve anything, but I believe they already said they will play their starters. So we'll see how their mindframe is. Again, it's very, VERY unlikely that our Eagles pick will be that high, but that's with EVERYTHING going "our way".

Keep in mind, if that scenario DOES happen, it's very likely we can get Garrett/Allen at #1, and then Mitch at #5. Well, at least possible.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/664727https://brownsboard.com/post/664727Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:06:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:59:17 GMT]]>

"One said:

Your attempt to make me faulable is futile as I was being coy.

Many names will come up as draft day inches forward as we all know but I'm in for a QB.

Faulable? Im trying to make you faulable?

Ok. Can anyone help me out here?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/664718https://brownsboard.com/post/664718Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:59:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:18:26 GMT]]>

@clevfan4life said:

Ok so looking at the keyboard ic that the "e" is on the other side from "o".....so u really think that name is spelled with an "o"? Srsly? And dont claim typo ive already closed the investigation on that

Your attempt to make me faulable is futile as I was being coy.

Many names will come up as draft day inches forward as we all know but I'm in for a QB.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/664702https://brownsboard.com/post/664702Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:18:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:12:15 GMT]]>

"One said:

Jarod Allen would be a great pickup although he is getting older. 🙂

Ok so looking at the keyboard ic that the "e" is on the other side from "o".....so u really think that name is spelled with an "o"? Srsly? And dont claim typo ive already closed the investigation on that

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/664701https://brownsboard.com/post/664701Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:12:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:55:23 GMT]]>Jarod Allen would be a great pickup although he is getting older. 🙂

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/664696https://brownsboard.com/post/664696Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:55:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:14:28 GMT]]>i'd be happy with Allen as the #1 pick, but it makes a little bit too much sense. This is the Browns we're talking about here. Trade down and draft a QB at #22 overall 😉

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/664689https://brownsboard.com/post/664689Tue, 20 Dec 2016 13:14:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:44:16 GMT]]>

@logicisforsquares said:

The Philly pick sits at 8 and continues to drop down. Being able to get Foster is looking very likely.

I would be totally on board with an Allen (my preference) or Garrett then Foster first round.

Eagles have the Giants (who are trying to maintain the wild card slot) Thursday night home and then they have the Cowboys (who may have already clinched #1 seeding by then) also @ home New Year's Day. Giants will be motivated so let's hope the Boys are too as well.

Chargers have us and then the Chiefs and are currently 5-9. We better hope they don't try to out tank us if war is right about the tank theory.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/664676https://brownsboard.com/post/664676Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:44:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:23:58 GMT]]>

@texasag1969 said:

I'd be happy as a pig in slop with either Allen or Garrett. Either one would be a day one impact player, especially if we can find a way to get Foster as our 2nd #1, another day one impact player. I'm actually happy with a coin flip on the first two, but Foster is one we should consider a trade up for IMO, depending upon where the Philly pick is in the draft.

The Philly pick sits at 8 and continues to drop down. Being able to get Foster is looking very likely.

I would be totally on board with an Allen (my preference) or Garrett then Foster first round.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/664675https://brownsboard.com/post/664675Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:23:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:00:31 GMT]]>I'd be happy as a pig in slop with either Allen or Garrett. Either one would be a day one impact player, especially if we can find a way to get Foster as our 2nd #1, another day one impact player. I'm actually happy with a coin flip on the first two, but Foster is one we should consider a trade up for IMO, depending upon where the Philly pick is in the draft.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/664668https://brownsboard.com/post/664668Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:00:31 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:27:02 GMT]]>

@tiamat63 said:

That's cool. Make your own thread.

I like Allen man, and I agree with you, i'm just more into the more high upside player.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/664636https://brownsboard.com/post/664636Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:27:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:22:43 GMT]]>That's cool. Make your own thread.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/664635https://brownsboard.com/post/664635Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:22:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:12:01 GMT]]>Garrett.... And then get a replacement for Wooden Legs Erving

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/664633https://brownsboard.com/post/664633Tue, 20 Dec 2016 08:12:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 07:49:21 GMT]]>But people will say that someone moving up for a QB proves there is a QB worth taking in this draft. And most agree that if there is one, we should take him.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/664630https://brownsboard.com/post/664630Tue, 20 Dec 2016 07:49:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 05:12:19 GMT]]>

@secondwave said:

Would anyone be opposed to trading down to the #3 pick? Bortles looks like he might be done in Jax, and they're gonna be looking for a QB. I feel like we can still get Allen with the #3 pick...

IF they offer a trade up, it's for a QB. I MAAAAAAY be willing to listen to that. Because at which point you're still guaranteed Allen or Garrett.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/664615https://brownsboard.com/post/664615Tue, 20 Dec 2016 05:12:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Camp Allen on Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:31:11 GMT]]>Would anyone be opposed to trading down to the #3 pick? Bortles looks like he might be done in Jax, and they're gonna be looking for a QB. I feel like we can still get Allen with the #3 pick...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/664608https://brownsboard.com/post/664608Tue, 20 Dec 2016 04:31:11 GMT