and cleve is too much a wannabe zombie to be much of anything or know anything.

@diehardbrownsfan said:

The universe is only 5,000 years old.

WSS

@mld-woody said:

The universe is only 5,000 years old.

@mld-woody said:

How to get me to ignore the rest of your post:

1) Claim I, as a young person, don't realize world history goes back more than 25 years.

2) Be a typical Steve

Woody I'm well aware how to get you to ignore my posts and it's fine.

Anything you can't answer with a stupid non-response is off-limits, I get it. Maybe I should just start posting pictures of woodpeckers. But I think others would understand the dynamic of world history in the early to mid 20th century.

WSS

@westside-steve said:

How to get me to ignore the rest of your post:

1) Claim I, as a young person, don't realize world history goes back more than 25 years.

2) Be a typical Steve

Probably a little bit strange because all Communications were not what they are today but you can see Prince from Nation to nation has monarchies across the world fell apart and were replaced by movement of the people. Communism and socialism it that time warrant probably has demonized as those two phrases have become and when the United States fell into the grips of the Great Depression Roosevelt flailed around figuring out what to do as did the rest of the country. Wage and price controls staggering taxation supporting every American make-work jobs etcetera etcetera. Luckily for us while the other two manufacturing Giants of the world we're blowing the shit out of each other we stepped into that role.

The result was a boom and our own economy and what with people being a little bit stupid Roosevelt socialist policies took the credit.

I don't think he is trying to be evil just had no idea what to do and who could blame him?

We had a common enemy to rail against and accepted the responsibility as the New World Order industrial Giant.

One might agree or disagree that Roosevelt's socialist policies have been good for the progress of the country or not.

WSS

@calfoxwc said:

you want to start being the asshole woodpecker of the board again huh?

For calling you out on the ridiculous stuff you're saying?

And you're responding by calling me an asshole and corrupt?

But I'm the asshole?

@calfoxwc said:

*Proceeds to make a subjective evaluation of Obama based on an article which doesn't mention Obama once*

You libfooks think he is very humble?

wait.......

LOLLOLLOLLOLLOLLOLLOL !

@jbluhm86 said:

Yeah but you're just emoting

@mld-woody said:

The funny part is, if you read the ammoland article he posted, it doesn't even mention Obama at all. Not once. Cal completely connected FDR, Woodrow Wilson, etc (all past presidents) to Obama on his own, yet its a failure of "critical thinking" on my part to highlight Reagan's failings in previous threads because, as you know, "when talking about current events, it's witless to go back to Reagan (a past president) and try to draw comparisons over subjective matter". Amazing.

as pointing out about FDR and Wilson.

To try to defend obamao raising the budget by saying reagan and bush did, too,

is subjective and narrow - the critical thinking part is, objectivity requires the observance

of the reasons why the budget was added to. Buidling our military/fighting a war is far more

a legit justification than increasing entitlements and blowing our health care system into

financial oblivion.

Not the same thing, but you libs love to gloss over the details to make emotional false moral equivalencies.

@calfoxwc said:

Obamao - supremely arrogant. So were FDR. So was Wilson. It's a simple corollary. Continued proven extreme and dangerous

arrogance in the democratic party.

Look at the dems heading up sancuatary cities and defying our immigration law.

I don't believe there is any sanctuary city where the mayor is republican.

But saying Reagan added to the budget as a defense for obamao adding to the budject is stupid. Reagan had to rebuild

our military etc after Carter. Bush had to fight a war after 9/11, after clinton let the middle east fall apart. Obamao had a

giant new gov agenda - healthcare control dominance, energy control dominance, etc etc.

Gotta learn how to critically think, but libs emote instead.

@calfoxwc said:

this was a disgrace. Similar to obamao and the dems calling veterans, the Tea Party,

anti-abortion folks...etc etc etc....a "threat".

FDR labled all Japanese Americans a threat, too.

Never again. Obamao would have, it he could have created a chance by opening our borders

to drug cartels, many criminals, and destitute illegals at any cost....he wanted to create a crisis,

just couldn't make it happen in time.

Yep. FDR was a democrat. Woodrow Wilson was also one of the worst. He was a democrat.

Obamao was one of the worst. He was a democrat.

http://www.ammoland.com/2017/01/not-an-internment-camp-u-s-concentration-camp-1942/?utm_source=Ammoland+Subscribers&utm_campaign=ecf18789b4-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_6f6fac3eaa-ecf18789b4-20770865#axzz4Uk6tH0Vi

So, how is your tirade against the potential failings of a president who's been dead longer than you've been alive any different? They're not, really.

@mld-woody said:

You mean “balance our concern for National Security with a commitment to respect the basic civil rights of all our fellow citizens”?