<![CDATA[Browns picks over next two years]]>Currently have eight in the first two rounds. Three first rounders and five second rounders.

Yes they have to get them right etc but it feels like now or never for this franchise. They'll never have a better chance to get this team going in the right direction.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/46195/browns-picks-over-next-two-yearsRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 02:28:25 GMTThu, 09 Mar 2017 22:56:17 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:25:08 GMT]]>It's the right thing to do for every team without a QB. Run the ball and play good defense to stay competitive till the day you luck into a QB. If ya prioritize QB over everything else, you merely create an environment that makes it more difficult for a young QB to succeed.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690914https://brownsboard.com/post/690914Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:25:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Sat, 11 Mar 2017 08:56:29 GMT]]>

@texasag1969 said:

NFL Network speculated on that saying the Browns may be building the way Seattle did, build the rest of the team first, then drop in a QB who is not under pressure to "save" the franchise, just get 17 or so completions a game.

Couldn't agree more.

Kudos to the FO if this was their plan since last year... and moreso since they seem to have convinced Haslam that you can't build solely through the draft if you want a quicker turn around.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690844https://brownsboard.com/post/690844Sat, 11 Mar 2017 08:56:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:26:16 GMT]]>

@cambridgeho said:

With all the 2nds the next 2 years. Woukd it be possible to trade a few 2nds for a 15-32 range for another player. Not sure how the points add up.

Sure... problem is using which chart? Can get very expensive, if use the old, JJohnson one and you're talking about the 15 end of your range.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690594https://brownsboard.com/post/690594Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:26:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:23:18 GMT]]>

@texasag1969 said:

Since we have him and released RG III, there is now no harm in trying if we do not acquire anyone else in FA or draft. Would you just rather have Kessler/Hogan?

Absolutely, but I can't see us not taking a QB at some point of the draft... even if we grab an FA or make a trade.

Based on some of the dirt surfacing in HOU, I don't think I want Brockweiler in my QB room.

Kess v Hogan? I was thinking about that a bit ago. I have to go Kess

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690592https://brownsboard.com/post/690592Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:23:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:24:23 GMT]]>With all the 2nds the next 2 years. Would it be possible to trade a few 2nds for a 15-32 range pick. Not sure how the points add up.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690589https://brownsboard.com/post/690589Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:24:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 19:23:13 GMT]]>

@tour2ma said:

** shudders **

Please, keep thoughts like that last one to yourself...

You know how allergic I am too long motions and slow releases...

LOL Gip ( that would be OL, OL for you Tour) 😄

Since we have him and released RG III, there is now no harm in trying if we do not acquire anyone else in FA or draft. Would you just rather have Kessler/Hogan?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690499https://brownsboard.com/post/690499Fri, 10 Mar 2017 19:23:13 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:09:40 GMT]]>

@tour2ma said:

** shudders **

Please, keep thoughts like that last one to yourself...

You know how allergic I am too long motions and slow releases...

So? Its Wham Bam, Thank you Ma'am for you?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690450https://brownsboard.com/post/690450Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:09:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:54:27 GMT]]>** shudders **

Please, keep thoughts like that last one to yourself...

You know how allergic I am too long motions and slow releases...

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690445https://brownsboard.com/post/690445Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:54:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:42:41 GMT]]>

@the-gipper said:

More and more though it may be possible that that QB will be someone they may want to after in next year's draft...not this year's.

Darnold

Rosen etc.

NFL Network speculated on that saying the Browns may be building the way Seattle did, build the rest of the team first, then drop in a QB who is not under pressure to "save" the franchise, just get 17 or so completions a game. We have addressed our OL very well so far and if we go "all in" on a D with this strong defensive draft, then we have our answer. BO in the meantime can try to rekindle his prospects with a guy who loves the taller QBs. That latter was my thought, not theirs.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690433https://brownsboard.com/post/690433Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:42:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:55:21 GMT]]>

@gumby73 said:

The QB will be the absolute key of this whole re-Boot..Our divisional teams are still full of aging veterans & there QB's are not getting any younger either..Need the Big Boot behind center. but we got better pieces around it today..Baby Steps took a big step today..

More and more though it may be possible that that QB will be someone they may want to after in next year's draft...not this year's.

Darnold

Rosen etc.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690402https://brownsboard.com/post/690402Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:55:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:33:39 GMT]]>One of the points on NFL Live yesterday is that this many picks cannot be used to draft individual players beyond year 2 of a rebuild. To do so would turn over the roster too fast, keep it too young to ever develop into a successful playoff team. So that leaves using the accumulated picks as currency to trade for players or higher picks.

I agree for the most part, but that two-year limit is contingent upon drafting well both of those years. This is our year two and I think most here agree that our year one draft was OK at best.

Combine that with our growing confidence in our FO's ability to evaluate player worth (Schwartz and TP) and I feel pretty good about letting them determine the most effective path to our next QB.

And I would not be surprised to see that path have more than one branch... just as a hedge.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690323https://brownsboard.com/post/690323Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:33:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:40:58 GMT]]>We have ammo for any trade we want. I see us building the defense this year and the FO going all in on Josh Rosen next year.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690294https://brownsboard.com/post/690294Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:40:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:24:56 GMT]]>2017: 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 6

2018: 1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 6, 6, 7

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690239https://brownsboard.com/post/690239Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:24:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 06:39:17 GMT]]>

@beare said:

OR could they be stockpiling for a qb next year???

Possiblity.

With Garrett added this year - some DBs would be nice - Browns D might actually win them some games.

With a mid-teens #1 next year, they could package some of those #2s to move up and get a QB.

Wouldn't surprise me if this wasn't 'the plan' (roughly) since last year when this FO was put together.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690234https://brownsboard.com/post/690234Fri, 10 Mar 2017 06:39:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 05:36:29 GMT]]>OR could they be stockpiling for a qb next year???

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690230https://brownsboard.com/post/690230Fri, 10 Mar 2017 05:36:29 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 04:43:34 GMT]]>Pick up Bennett in FA and then we don't need to take O.J. as a TE @ 12. Use it on another quality defender.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690222https://brownsboard.com/post/690222Fri, 10 Mar 2017 04:43:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 04:38:52 GMT]]>I don't think we have a blockbuster brewing, I think we're re-upping our ammo for next year. If anything, I'm hoping this means we don't trade down too much in the draft this year, although I'm still expecting it.

Future assests are the name of the game now.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690220https://brownsboard.com/post/690220Fri, 10 Mar 2017 04:38:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 04:33:59 GMT]]>

@jcam222 said:

I feel like they have a blockbuster brewing for our new QB.

Me too, but it may already be agreed upon.

Mike

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690219https://brownsboard.com/post/690219Fri, 10 Mar 2017 04:33:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 04:19:33 GMT]]>

@devildawg55 said:

I wouldn't trade these picks for Elway,Manning, or Elway. 8 in the first 2 rounds? We could do so serious damage at this point.

no shit, Elway is old as dirt, Manning is aging/so-so, and Elway is old as dirt.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690214https://brownsboard.com/post/690214Fri, 10 Mar 2017 04:19:33 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 03:19:12 GMT]]>I wouldn't trade these picks for Elway,Manning, or Elway. 8 in the first 2 rounds? We could do so serious damage at this point.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690197https://brownsboard.com/post/690197Fri, 10 Mar 2017 03:19:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 03:13:40 GMT]]>The QB will be the absolute key of this whole re-Boot..Our divisional teams are still full of aging veterans & there QB's are not getting any younger either..Need the Big Boot behind center. but we got better pieces around it today..Baby Steps took a big step today..

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690189https://brownsboard.com/post/690189Fri, 10 Mar 2017 03:13:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Fri, 10 Mar 2017 02:56:11 GMT]]>I feel like they have a blockbuster brewing for our new QB.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690175https://brownsboard.com/post/690175Fri, 10 Mar 2017 02:56:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Browns picks over next two years on Thu, 09 Mar 2017 23:03:03 GMT]]>"... to get..." ???

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/690081https://brownsboard.com/post/690081Thu, 09 Mar 2017 23:03:03 GMT