<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Judge Gorsuch]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>So I realize some of you are Democrats, Trump haters or just general malcontent but I'm curious as to what will be the basis of the opposition to the Supreme Court nomination here? Is there anything of substance or are you just mad about Merrick Garland?</p>

<p>WSS </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/46310/judge-gorsuch</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 08:47:48 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/46310.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2017 12:56:50 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Thu, 06 Apr 2017 21:34:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>obamao got his two suprem courts with republican help. They were technically qualified, so they voted them in.</p>

<p>now, the shoe is on the other foot, and naturally, the dems want to stick their heads up their rears and change things.</p>

<p>And, obamao had no business trying to coerce Congress to give him a third justice toward the end of his eight years.</p>

<p>A lameduck appt to the supreme court isn't what American voted for to give Trump the presidency.</p>

<p>  As far as the "nuclear option", DO IT. The dems changed the rules to 60 votes when they had the chance, for THEIR</p>
<p>advantage, in 03. The gullible reps aren't so gullible now. The dems will throw out any rule as soon as they get the</p>
<p>advantage...the corrupt mafia-type4 asswholes.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/697005</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/697005</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 21:34:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Thu, 06 Apr 2017 16:57:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/westside-steve" aria-label="Profile: westside-steve">@<bdi>westside-steve</bdi></a> <a href="/post/696750">said</a>:</p><div>

<p>And again I thought Garland probably should have gotten a hearing. But I don't see any reason whatsoever to block Gorsuch except for spite.</p>
<p>It could really backfire on the Democrats if we can replace two more because of their obstructionism.</p>
<p>WSS</p>
</div></blockquote>
<p>Hard to believe, but maybe, just maybe this political behavior may wake America up and we'll all be better off for it (whether you're a R, D, or I).</p>

<p>I'm sure it will be an issue in the mid-terms (2018), but then again, Americans may fall asleep from apathy.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/696961</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/696961</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob806]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2017 16:57:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Wed, 05 Apr 2017 20:19:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>It's a mental disorder, liberalism is. They demand cooperation when they don't own Congress, but when they do,</p>
<p>they arrogantly and belligerently refused any cooperation.</p>

<p>It's a civil war by the left.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/696817</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/696817</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 20:19:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Wed, 05 Apr 2017 13:03:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>CNN is absolutely out of their minds.  I think since Trump has singled them out the most, they are 100 percent anti Trump on everything.  90 percent of the news is anti Trump.  Their ratings have plummeted below MSNBC even.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/696756</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/696756</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DieHardBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 13:03:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Wed, 05 Apr 2017 11:53:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/diehardbrownsfan" aria-label="Profile: diehardbrownsfan">@<bdi>diehardbrownsfan</bdi></a> <a href="/post/696751">said</a>:</p><p>Several top Republicans said he would be confirmed by the end of  the week</p></blockquote>Oh probably but I don't think you're going to get eight Democrats to sign on. They are actually deranged these days. Worse than the Republicans ever worry about Obama.
<p>It's possible they will understand that letting him through would be in their best interest but who knows?</p>
<p>WSS</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/696752</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/696752</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Westside Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 11:53:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Wed, 05 Apr 2017 11:47:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/westside-steve" aria-label="Profile: westside-steve">@<bdi>westside-steve</bdi></a> <a href="/post/696750">said</a>:</p><div>
<p>So the filibuster is underway. Personally I let them go for at least a couple weeks straight and cherry-pick the stupid remarks for broadcast. Then going nuclear.</p>

<p>And again I thought Garland probably should have gotten a hearing. But I don't see any reason whatsoever to block Gorsuch except for spite.</p>
<p>It could really backfire on the Democrats if we can replace two more because of their obstructionism.</p>
<p>WSS</p>
</div></blockquote>
<p>Several top Republicans said he would be confirmed by the end of  the week</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/696751</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/696751</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DieHardBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 11:47:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Wed, 05 Apr 2017 11:51:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>So the filibuster is underway. Personally I let them go for at least a couple weeks straight and cherry-pick the stupid remarks for broadcast. Then go nuclear.</p>

<p>And again I thought Garland probably should have gotten a hearing. But I don't see any reason whatsoever to block Gorsuch except for spite.</p>
<p>It could really backfire on the Democrats if we can replace two more because of their obstructionism.</p>
<p>WSS</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/696750</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/696750</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Westside Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 11:51:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:38:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/calfoxwc" aria-label="Profile: calfoxwc">@<bdi>calfoxwc</bdi></a> <a href="/post/695626">said</a>:</p><p>Ginsburg needs to retire this year.</p></blockquote>
<p>And Kennedy. Let's go nuclear on all three.</p>

<p>WSS </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/695657</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/695657</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Westside Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 22:38:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Wed, 29 Mar 2017 20:28:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Ginsburg needs to retire this year.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/695626</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/695626</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 20:28:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:52:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<strong><span>Krauthammer: GOP Should Channel Clint Eastwood If Dems Filibuster Gorsuch</span></strong><p>Charles Krauthammer warned Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) that if he chooses to break Senate custom and push a filibuster of Supreme Court Nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch, Republicans should channel Clint Eastwood.</p>

<p>"If Schumer wants to trigger the nuclear option, I would quote Clint Eastwood with those immortal words: 'Make My Day', because it would be a disaster for the Democrats."</p>

<p>Traditionally, the Senate does not filibuster Supreme Court nominees, but confirms them with a 60-vote threshold.</p>
<p>Krauthammer said that once McConnell approves the nuclear option, it is likely that Trump's next court nominee would be farther to the political right than Gorsuch.</p>

<p>Democrats would not be able to stop that nominee, pending the 2018 election turnout and whether the next vacancy occurs before or after that time.</p>

<p><a href="http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/03/28/charles-krauthammer-clint-eastwood-make-my-day-republicans-confirm-gorsuch-without" rel="external nofollow">http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/03/28/charles-krauthammer-clint-eastwood-make-my-day-republicans-confirm-gorsuch-without</a></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/695538</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/695538</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OldBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:52:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:48:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Great News. If the dems are dumb enough to fillibuster a more than qualified supreme court justice in Gorsuch then change the senate rules like Harry Reid did and confirm supreme court nominees with a simple majority and while on Trump's watch hopefully he will have an opportunity to get a few more in place.</p>
	<strong><span>REPORT: McConnell prepares Republicans for NUCLEAR OPTION</span></strong><p><a href="http://therightscoop.com/report-mcconnell-prepares-republicans-for-nuclear-option/" rel="external nofollow">http://therightscoop.com/report-mcconnell-prepares-republicans-for-nuclear-option/</a></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/695536</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/695536</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OldBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:48:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Sat, 25 Mar 2017 15:32:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/westside-steve" aria-label="Profile: westside-steve">@<bdi>westside-steve</bdi></a> <a href="/post/694370">said</a>:</p>
<p>That would mean the same thing whether he was stopped on the side of the road or traveling to his destination. Can't imagine that's true.</p>
<p>And he drove off leaving the load and returned rather than wait for help.</p>
<p>WSS</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I couldn't find the link I had read so it could have just been a load of shit.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/694379</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/694379</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[LogicIsForSquares]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2017 15:32:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Sat, 25 Mar 2017 15:00:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/logicisforsquares" aria-label="Profile: logicisforsquares">@<bdi>logicisforsquares</bdi></a> <a href="/post/693936">said</a>:</p><p>I read that the cab of the truck was not climate controlled somewhere if memory serves. Let me find a link.</p></blockquote>That would mean the same thing whether he was stopped on the side of the road or traveling to his destination. Can't imagine that's true.<p>And he drove off leaving the load and returned rather than wait for help.</p>
<p>WSS</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/694370</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/694370</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Westside Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2017 15:00:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Sat, 25 Mar 2017 14:35:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><img src="https://scontent-atl3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/17309537_1837770936492492_1835924477968964004_n.jpg?oh=36851b7aff036a26ef04a3dc30838957&amp;oe=5971B87B" alt="17309537_1837770936492492_18359244779689" /></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/694366</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/694366</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DieHardBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2017 14:35:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Thu, 23 Mar 2017 21:51:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>they demand another activist, dishonest progressive hack on the court to suit them.</p>

<p>Change the rules - they did when it suited them, it's the only way to do any good things now.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/694035</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/694035</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 21:51:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Thu, 23 Mar 2017 21:42:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Chucky Schumer says the dems will filibuster Gorsuch. Time for the republicans to pull a Harry Reid and change the senate rules to a simple majority for supreme court nominees.</p>
	<strong><span>NY TIMES: Democrats plan to FILIBUSTER Gorsuch</span></strong><p><a href="http://therightscoop.com/ny-times-democrats-plan-to-filibuster-gorsuch/" rel="external nofollow">http://therightscoop.com/ny-times-democrats-plan-to-filibuster-gorsuch/</a></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/694034</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/694034</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OldBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 21:42:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:07:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I can't find it and for all I know it could have been some hit piece.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/693938</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/693938</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[LogicIsForSquares]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:07:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:06:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/westside-steve" aria-label="Profile: westside-steve">@<bdi>westside-steve</bdi></a> <a href="/post/693903">said</a>:</p><div>
<p>The cab was operational?</p>

<p>Apparently so since he got hooked the trailer and drove it away correct?</p>

<p>If that is in fact the case what would be the dangers from the inclement weather?</p>
<p>WSS</p>
</div></blockquote>
<p>I read that the cab of the truck was not climate controlled somewhere if memory serves. Let me find a link.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/693936</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/693936</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[LogicIsForSquares]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 15:06:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:29:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/westside-steve" aria-label="Profile: westside-steve">@<bdi>westside-steve</bdi></a> <a href="/post/693903">said</a>:</p>
<p>The cab was operational?</p>

<p>Apparently so since he got hooked the trailer and drove it away correct?</p>

<p>If that is in fact the case what would be the dangers from the inclement weather?</p>
<p>WSS</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Im guessing that he was low on gas which was why he had turned off snd was freezing. Because help wasnt coming soon that night he drove himself to the gas station. The issue of whether he was freezing or not didnt seem to be part of gorsuchs dissent. What gorsuch argued was that it was irrelevant the company still had the right to fire him despite clear circumstances pointing to faulty equipment beyond the drivers control.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/693918</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/693918</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clevfan4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 14:29:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Thu, 23 Mar 2017 12:51:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/clevfan4life" aria-label="Profile: clevfan4life">@<bdi>clevfan4life</bdi></a> <a href="/post/693894">said</a>:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trucker-surreal-to-be-topic-of-supreme-court-nomination/ar-BByCkUs?ocid=spartandhp" rel="external nofollow">http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trucker-surreal-to-be-topic-of-supreme-court-nomination/ar-BByCkUs?ocid=spartandhp</a></p>

<p>This is a case where Gorsuch gave a dissenting opinion that's being held against him. "IF" the facts presented in this article are true and not slanted, which is a good possibility, I'm at a loss to explain what Gorsuch was thinking.</p>
</blockquote>The cab was operational?
<p>Apparently so since he got hooked the trailer and drove it away correct?</p>

<p>If that is in fact the case what would be the dangers from the inclement weather?</p>
<p>WSS</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/693903</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/693903</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Westside Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 12:51:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Thu, 23 Mar 2017 12:14:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Gorsuch's chances of being confirmed in the senate...99.9999%.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/693896</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/693896</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OldBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 12:14:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:52:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trucker-surreal-to-be-topic-of-supreme-court-nomination/ar-BByCkUs?ocid=spartandhp" rel="external nofollow">http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trucker-surreal-to-be-topic-of-supreme-court-nomination/ar-BByCkUs?ocid=spartandhp</a></p>

<p>This is a case where Gorsuch gave a dissenting opinion that's being held against him. "IF" the facts presented in this article are true and not slanted, which is a good possibility, I'm at a loss to explain what Gorsuch was thinking.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/693894</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/693894</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clevfan4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2017 11:52:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:36:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>speaking of witches... here's one - a former student of Gorsuch's....claims he made sexist remarks about pregnant women.</p>
<p>Gorsuch found out about the letter she sent out.... at his nomination proceedings...</p>
<p>she's another obaMao appointee - another dirty trick player.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/03/21/former-law-student-claims-neil-gorsuch-made-sexist-remarks-now-the-truth-has-been-revealed/" rel="external nofollow">http://www.theblaze.com/news/2017/03/21/former-law-student-claims-neil-gorsuch-made-sexist-remarks-now-the-truth-has-been-revealed/</a></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/693798</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/693798</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:36:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Judge Gorsuch on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:27:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Well it's pretty obvious from the bump and stocks of companies that sell stakes, coal oil and dunking stools, that the industry is expecting a return to witch trials.</p>
<p>Good call Senator Feinstein, be sure to park your broom behind the house.</p>

<p>WSS </p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/693797</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/693797</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Westside Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2017 20:27:56 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>