<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[top 100]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000802568/article/mike-mayocks-2017-nfl-draft-top-100-prospect-rankings" rel="external nofollow">http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000802568/article/mike-mayocks-2017-nfl-draft-top-100-prospect-rankings</a></p>

<p>If you look at this list and if we stick with our picks and don't trade and go with BPA.  We can fill a lot of holes.  Even with players around our picks are intriguing.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/46657/top-100</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 05:48:56 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/46657.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 15:43:41 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to top 100 on Wed, 26 Apr 2017 20:54:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>So 60% of QB picks are going to be busts this year.  So why not get a highly touted defensive player this year?</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/701997</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/701997</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[LBC mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 20:54:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to top 100 on Wed, 26 Apr 2017 20:16:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/hoorta" aria-label="Profile: hoorta">@<bdi>hoorta</bdi></a> <a href="/post/701949">said</a>:</p><div>

<p>That's Maycock's <u><strong>opinion.</strong></u> When it starts for real at 8PM Thursday the only opinions that matter are the 32 teams doing the drafting.</p>
</div></blockquote>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Well, in my opinion you need to look back 5 years to determine a damned thing about drafted players.</span></p>

<p><span style="color:#800000">Here are the Top Ten productive players that came out of the 2012 draft:</span></p>

<p><span style="color:#800000">1. Russell Wilson QB  rd. 3</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">2. Luke Kuechly LB  rd. 1</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">3. Bobby Wagner  LB  rd. 2</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">4. Andrew Luck QB  rd. 1</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">5. Ryan Tannehill QB rd. 1</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">6. T.Y. Hilton WR rd. 3</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">7. Lavante David LB  rd. 2</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">8. Fletcher Cox DT  rd. 1</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">9. Dontari Poe DT rd. 1</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">10 Chandler Jones rd 1</span></p>

<p><span style="color:#800000">Here are the 5 worst First round picks (only) of that year:</span></p>

<p><span style="color:#800000">AJ Jenkins WR   SFO</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">David Wilson RB  NYG</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Justin Blackmon WR  Jax</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Brandon Weeden QB  Cleve.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Nick Perry DE   Green Bay</span></p>

<p><span style="color:#800000">So, expect about 60% of the best players from this coming draft to come from round 1.</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">And expect about a third of the first rounders taken to become....underachievers, if not out and out busts.</span></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/701981</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/701981</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 20:16:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to top 100 on Wed, 26 Apr 2017 20:03:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/lbc-mike" aria-label="Profile: lbc-mike">@<bdi>lbc-mike</bdi></a> <a href="/post/701886">said</a>:</p><div>
<p><a href="http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000802568/article/mike-mayocks-2017-nfl-draft-top-100-prospect-rankings" rel="external nofollow">http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000802568/article/mike-mayocks-2017-nfl-draft-top-100-prospect-rankings</a></p>

<p>If you look at this list and if we stick with our picks and don't trade and go with BPA. We can fill a lot of holes. Even with players around our picks are intriguing.</p>
</div></blockquote>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Top 100?</span></p>

<p><span style="color:#800000">Beatles</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Elvis</span></p>
<p><span style="color:#800000">Michael Jackson</span></p>

<p><span style="color:#800000">errr, orrr, errr I thought you were talking singles/albums sales.</span></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/701978</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/701978</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 20:03:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to top 100 on Wed, 26 Apr 2017 19:08:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/lbc-mike" aria-label="Profile: lbc-mike">@<bdi>lbc-mike</bdi></a> <a href="/post/701934">said</a>:</p><div><p>There are 29 better players than the biscuit. Think this list came out before the tape allegation.</p></div></blockquote>

<p>That's Maycock's <u><strong>opinion.</strong></u> When it starts for real at 8PM Thursday the only opinions that matter are the 32 teams doing the drafting.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/701949</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/701949</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hoorta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 19:08:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to top 100 on Wed, 26 Apr 2017 18:26:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>There are 29 better players than the biscuit.  Think this list came out before the tape allegation.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/701934</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/701934</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[LBC mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 18:26:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to top 100 on Wed, 26 Apr 2017 18:07:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>If nothing else, Mayock is his own man...</p>

<p>Has Kittle at 77... highest I've seen him.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/701927</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/701927</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tour2ma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 18:07:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to top 100 on Wed, 26 Apr 2017 17:40:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/lbc-mike" aria-label="Profile: lbc-mike">@<bdi>lbc-mike</bdi></a> <a href="/post/701886">said</a>:</p><div>
<p><a href="http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000802568/article/mike-mayocks-2017-nfl-draft-top-100-prospect-rankings" rel="external nofollow">http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000802568/article/mike-mayocks-2017-nfl-draft-top-100-prospect-rankings</a></p>

<p>If you look at this list and if we stick with our picks and don't trade and go with BPA. We can fill a lot of holes. Even with players around our picks are intriguing.</p>
</div></blockquote>

<p>Conley might be his #11 prospect, but after the Cleveland thing- he's not going in the top 20.  <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=2a192e496db" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" title=":slightly_smiling_face:" alt="🙂" />  Lead pipe lock guarantee- Trubisky will go higher than #30.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/701914</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/701914</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hoorta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 17:40:40 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>