<![CDATA[The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey]]>http://thetruthwins.com/archives/paul-harveys-warning-to-america-if-i-were-the-devil

Paul Harvey’s Warning To America: If I Were The Devil….

On April 3rd, 1965 legendary radio host Paul Harvey issued a warning to America. In this warning, he detailed what he thought the devil should do if the devil wanted to keep destroying the United States. Sadly, the truth is that most of this stuff has come to pass. What Paul Harvey saw for America’s future back in 1965 if the devil had his way was eerily accurate. Please share this with as many people as you can….

******************************

If I were the Devil . . . I mean, if I were the Prince of Darkness, I would of course, want to engulf the whole earth in darkness. I would have a third of its real estate and four-fifths of its population, but I would not be happy until I had seized the ripest apple on the tree, so I should set about however necessary to take over the United States.

I would begin with a campaign of whispers. With the wisdom of a serpent, I would whisper to you as I whispered to Eve: “Do as you please.” “Do as you please.”

To the young, I would whisper, “The Bible is a myth.” I would convince them that man created God instead of the other way around. I would confide that what is bad is good, and what is good is “square”.

In the ears of the young marrieds, I would whisper that work is debasing, that cocktail parties are good for you. I would caution them not to be extreme in religion, in patriotism, in moral conduct.

And the old, I would teach to pray. I would teach them to say after me: “Our Father, which art in Washington” . . .

If I were the devil, I’d educate authors in how to make lurid literature exciting so that anything else would appear dull an uninteresting. I’d threaten T.V. with dirtier movies and vice versa.

And then, if I were the devil, I’d get organized. I’d infiltrate unions and urge more loafing and less work, because idle hands usually work for me.

I’d peddle narcotics to whom I could. I’d sell alcohol to ladies and gentlemen of distinction. And I’d tranquilize the rest with pills.

If I were the devil, I would encourage schools to refine young intellects but neglect to discipline emotions . . . let those run wild. I would designate an atheist to front for me before the highest courts in the land and I would get preachers to say “she’s right.”

With flattery and promises of power, I could get the courts to rule what I construe as against God and in favor of pornography, and thus, I would evict God from the courthouse, and then from the school house, and then from the houses of Congress and then, in His own churches I would substitute psychology for religion, and I would deify science because that way men would become smart enough to create super weapons, but not wise enough to control them.

If I were Satan, I’d make the symbol of Easter an egg and the symbol
of Christmas a bottle. If I were the devil, I would take from those
who have and I would give to those who wanted, until I had killed the incentive of the ambitious. And then, my police state would force everybody back to work. Then, I could separate families, putting children in uniform, women in coal mines, and objectors in slave camps.

In other words, if I were Satan,
I’d just keep on doing what he’s doing.

Paul Harvey, Good Day.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/46828/the-sad-truth-from-1965...-paul-harveyRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 11:32:36 GMTMon, 15 May 2017 19:31:49 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Wed, 17 May 2017 17:07:45 GMT]]>OK I see you have no intention of being serious. No Woody not all. You see when anybody uses words like all or every somebody will say wait wait wait there is this one guy who...

So I won't give you the opportunity to use that lame ass gotcha.

But if you behave in an Anti-social criminal or irresponsible manner I can't imagine very many circumstances in which it's not your own fault no matter who you are.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706880https://brownsboard.com/post/706880Wed, 17 May 2017 17:07:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Wed, 17 May 2017 16:18:11 GMT]]>I just wanted you to answer my last question

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706875https://brownsboard.com/post/706875Wed, 17 May 2017 16:18:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Wed, 17 May 2017 10:59:50 GMT]]>

@mld-woody said:

So poor relations are all on black people?

OK Woody I understand you're going to keep asking the same question over and over so how about you give us your opinion?

Equal rights is the law you know and you can be actually prosecuted if it even seems like you're denying someone, right?

Beyond that why is it someone else's fault for the behavior among poor blacks and what needs to be done to correct it?

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706831https://brownsboard.com/post/706831Wed, 17 May 2017 10:59:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Wed, 17 May 2017 07:53:06 GMT]]>

@mld-woody said:

So poor relations are all on black people?

Stuart

For the most part yes.

As affirmed and or strongly implied by notable blacks such as Sheriff David Clarke, economists Dr. Thomas Sowell, Dr. Walter Williams, Alan Keys, Larry Elder....the list goes on and on.

When your head is buried in the sand all that can be seen is that ass that you make yourself out to be.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706826https://brownsboard.com/post/706826Wed, 17 May 2017 07:53:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Wed, 17 May 2017 02:56:17 GMT]]>So poor relations are all on black people?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706813https://brownsboard.com/post/706813Wed, 17 May 2017 02:56:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Tue, 16 May 2017 22:32:40 GMT]]>

@mld-woody said:

So there are bad race relations between white and black people, because white people are afraid of black people, but black people did it to themselves?

Yes to a great extent. It's unfortunate but it's true.

And not only white people but every other race including other blacks.

Is it hard for you to understand? Or are you just being a...

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706778https://brownsboard.com/post/706778Tue, 16 May 2017 22:32:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Tue, 16 May 2017 22:07:53 GMT]]>

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706773https://brownsboard.com/post/706773Tue, 16 May 2017 22:07:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Tue, 16 May 2017 21:58:57 GMT]]>So there are bad race relations between white and black people, because white people are afraid of black people, but black people did it to themselves?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706770https://brownsboard.com/post/706770Tue, 16 May 2017 21:58:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Tue, 16 May 2017 21:53:00 GMT]]>

@mld-woody said:

Are you talking about race relations or trying to justify racist ideas?

Wow brilliant. So the reason people are more afraid of pitbulls than border collies is because they are just mean people?

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706769https://brownsboard.com/post/706769Tue, 16 May 2017 21:53:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Tue, 16 May 2017 21:30:02 GMT]]>Negative site! Bad old people! Dying! Scary dark people!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706765https://brownsboard.com/post/706765Tue, 16 May 2017 21:30:02 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Tue, 16 May 2017 21:28:12 GMT]]>Aaaaand that study. Every freaking time...

By the Media Research Center

From their own site

"Since 1987, the Media Research Center (MRC) has been the nations premier media watchdog. We dont endorse politicians and we dont lobby for legislation. MRCs sole mission is to expose and neutralize the propaganda arm of the Left: the national news media. This makes the MRCs work unique within the conservative movement."

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706764https://brownsboard.com/post/706764Tue, 16 May 2017 21:28:12 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Tue, 16 May 2017 21:24:43 GMT]]>Right but if you objectively do negative things, and people report on those negative things, is it the networks fault they're showing "negative coverage"?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706762https://brownsboard.com/post/706762Tue, 16 May 2017 21:24:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Tue, 16 May 2017 21:14:44 GMT]]>

@mld-woody said:

And if you're far enough right (or left) anything even slightly the other way will come off as super liberal (or conservative).

A news program that's moderate will seem liberal to you. Probably because you actively get news from very clearly biased sources.

And then suddenly everything becomes "MSM" and liberal.

Hostile: 89 Percent of Network Trump Coverage Is Negative Study finds ABC, CBS, NBC overwhelmingly biased against president in first 80 days

by Kathryn Blackhurst | Updated 20 Apr 2017 at 11:46 AM

Although the mainstream media famously afforded former President Barack Obama a “honeymoon period” in the early months of his presidency, President Donald Trump received no such fawning treatment, according to a study released Wednesday by the Media Research Center.

Three of the major news networks — ABC, CBS and NBC — gave Trump “by far the most hostile press treatment of any incoming American president,” the MRC study found. Through analysis of the three networks’ evening news coverage from Jan. 20 to April 9, the study found that 89 percent of coverage of the Trump administration had been negative.

http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/hostile-89-percent-network-trump-coverage-negative/

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706758https://brownsboard.com/post/706758Tue, 16 May 2017 21:14:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Tue, 16 May 2017 20:11:42 GMT]]>Stop with the unprovoked attacks Cal!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706754https://brownsboard.com/post/706754Tue, 16 May 2017 20:11:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Tue, 16 May 2017 19:40:53 GMT]]>

@mld-woody said:

And if you're far enough right (or left) anything even slightly the other way will come off as super liberal (or conservative).

A news program that's moderate will seem liberal to you. Probably because you actively get news from very clearly biased sources.

And then suddenly everything becomes "MSM" and liberal.8eqJnHR.gif

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706747https://brownsboard.com/post/706747Tue, 16 May 2017 19:40:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Tue, 16 May 2017 19:16:07 GMT]]>And if you're far enough right (or left) anything even slightly the other way will come off as super liberal (or conservative).

A news program that's moderate will seem liberal to you. Probably because you actively get news from very clearly biased sources.

And then suddenly everything becomes "MSM" and liberal.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706741https://brownsboard.com/post/706741Tue, 16 May 2017 19:16:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Tue, 16 May 2017 17:24:21 GMT]]>

@mld-woody said:

Yeah but those very right wing groups have just thrown definitions out of the window over the last few years and used those terms as they've felt like. IMO.

"Real" American - someone I agree with politically

"Fake" News - news that paints what I believe in a negative light

Let's take the 'fake news" part of this. When the news is reported unfairly or with bias and journalists try to slant news to go along with a narrative they are trying to present than to me that is not real journalism and it is rampantly going on today. Sure it goes on both sides but the liberal side has much more of it because the MSM which most people get their news from are liberally biased.

Let me give one quick example. The MSM runs a piece on replacing Obamacare on the nightly news. In Obamacare there are some winners but mostly losers. So the nightly news interviews a few people who have been helped by Obamacare but don't balance that with those who have been hurt with Obamacare by higher premiums and deductibles along with employers reducing hours to part time to keep from Obamacare mandates. I see this type of reporting over and over in the MSM.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706722https://brownsboard.com/post/706722Tue, 16 May 2017 17:24:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Tue, 16 May 2017 17:15:24 GMT]]>Yeah but those very right wing groups have just thrown definitions out of the window over the last few years and used those terms as they've felt like. IMO.

"Real" American - someone I agree with politically

"Fake" News - news that paints what I believe in a negative light

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706720https://brownsboard.com/post/706720Tue, 16 May 2017 17:15:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Tue, 16 May 2017 17:13:15 GMT]]>

@mld-woody said:

So is that a trademarked thing? To put "Real" in front of conservative cornerstones/buzzwords?

Nothing like complaining about the left claiming their victims while also claiming to be a victim

There is the real and fake...you should know that.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706719https://brownsboard.com/post/706719Tue, 16 May 2017 17:13:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Tue, 16 May 2017 17:12:17 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

All like I said it's probably better than during slavery. But I don't see how you can turn a blind-eye to the crime and the murder rate and the poverty and the lack of education amongst one particular group. If it was just past discrimination the Jews the Irish the Italian's the Asians would all be living in hell holes. But....

WSS

Are you talking about race relations or trying to justify racist ideas?

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706717https://brownsboard.com/post/706717Tue, 16 May 2017 17:12:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Tue, 16 May 2017 17:12:16 GMT]]>

@mld-woody said:

"My side"?

Oh, right, I don't think gays are pervert sinners. My mistake.

That basically means I agree with all of the craziest, liberal, SJW ideals

Yep your side. The ones who believe in science until the issue is abortion and then a baby is just a part of a woman's body and they can do with what they wish or people can decide whatever sex they chose to be and now liberal New York has 26 different categories. Just a few examples I could give plenty more. This is "your side".

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706716https://brownsboard.com/post/706716Tue, 16 May 2017 17:12:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Tue, 16 May 2017 16:39:27 GMT]]>

@mld-woody said:

Yeeaaahhh.... I'm still going to say better. I think 24hr news and certain websites are showing a vocal minority of incidents.

All like I said it's probably better than during slavery. But I don't see how you can turn a blind-eye to the crime and the murder rate and the poverty and the lack of education amongst one particular group. If it was just past discrimination the Jews the Irish the Italian's the Asians would all be living in hell holes. But....

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706711https://brownsboard.com/post/706711Tue, 16 May 2017 16:39:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Tue, 16 May 2017 16:29:42 GMT]]>

@oldbrownsfan said:

Real Christianity is more than a religion but a relationship but I do believe we are living in the end times and are seeing right now a great falling away from the faith. Many churches today to keep from persecution from the world and in an attempt to get along with the world are taking sides against clear bible teachings such as about homosexuality and abortion and some are even turning against Israel.

I am happy to see every Muslim convert to Christianity but Islam seems to be the religion gaining ground while Christianity is losing ground:

Why Islam may surpass Christianity as world's largest faith

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/03/21/why-islam-may-surpass-christianity-as-worlds-largest-faith.html

Another Study Confirms Christianity is Fading in America

http://www.worldreligionnews.com/religion-news/christianity/another-study-confirms-christianity-is-fading-in-america

Britain really is ceasing to be a Christian country The decline in religious belief has become precipitous in recent years

https://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/05/britain-really-is-ceasing-to-be-a-christian-country/

So is that a trademarked thing? To put "Real" in front of conservative cornerstones/buzzwords?

Nothing like complaining about the left claiming their victims while also claiming to be a victim

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706710https://brownsboard.com/post/706710Tue, 16 May 2017 16:29:42 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to The sad truth from 1965... Paul Harvey on Tue, 16 May 2017 16:26:40 GMT]]>

@oldbrownsfan said:

Liberalism has their own religion to control the masses. The thought police are one arm of that branch. The PC thought police come from your side Woody.

"My side"?

Oh, right, I don't think gays are pervert sinners. My mistake.

That basically means I agree with all of the craziest, liberal, SJW ideals

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/706709https://brownsboard.com/post/706709Tue, 16 May 2017 16:26:40 GMT