<![CDATA[Surprised?]]>http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/26/politics/kris-kobach-alex-padilla-personal-voter-data-california/index.html]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/47411/surprisedRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 02:49:35 GMTThu, 27 Jul 2017 21:31:08 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:30:01 GMT]]>if liberals are all that worried about giving out iniformation on voting, they should

enforce legitimate voting of each voter.

but they don't. They want illegals to vote...obviously, that would be democratic.

asswhole liberal hypocritical sombeitches.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/717277https://brownsboard.com/post/717277Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:30:01 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:28:27 GMT]]>and yet, liberals fight to get information on those who donate to the republican party...

and they fight to get all gun owners registered nationally, etc etc etc.

then they use the information as a weapon. but they turn around and insist

that information they DON'T want to get out... should stay private.

because liberals feel GOOD when they can use the info....so they like it. But they feel ANGRY when

it's information they do NOT want given to the feds.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/717276https://brownsboard.com/post/717276Wed, 02 Aug 2017 00:28:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Tue, 01 Aug 2017 23:22:36 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

Bottom line question so what do you suppose the states have to hide?

WSS

I really don't know. The issue I have, and I believe many share, is more bottom up than top down. Many citizens have no issue with government intrusion or regulation when they have no skin in the game but when they do they scream socialism and small government. My voting records have absolutely nothing to hide and I'd wager most, if not all, in here are the same but I take issue with the government without any proof "auditing" my life.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/717268https://brownsboard.com/post/717268Tue, 01 Aug 2017 23:22:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Tue, 01 Aug 2017 03:41:20 GMT]]>

@baconhound said:

Or the flip side where a State releases the information requested and a voter, or more likely a lobby, sues the State for disseminating the information.

Bottom line question so what do you suppose the states have to hide?

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/717107https://brownsboard.com/post/717107Tue, 01 Aug 2017 03:41:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Tue, 01 Aug 2017 01:48:16 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

So it doesn't seem to me like there's any protocol besides cya. Correct? Sort of along the lines of the Fifth Amendment?

Maybe the Attorney General could subpoena it. Hope so.

WSS

Or the flip side where a State releases the information requested and a voter, or more likely a lobby, sues the State for disseminating the information.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/717100https://brownsboard.com/post/717100Tue, 01 Aug 2017 01:48:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Tue, 01 Aug 2017 01:39:50 GMT]]>

@baconhound said:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/due_process

The information is requested and the custodian determines whether or not they release it. Based on the custodian's decision either the requester or a third party may request the Court way in as a point of law.

So it doesn't seem to me like there's any protocol besides cya. Correct? Sort of along the lines of the Fifth Amendment?

Maybe the Attorney General could subpoena it. Hope so.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/717097https://brownsboard.com/post/717097Tue, 01 Aug 2017 01:39:50 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Mon, 31 Jul 2017 23:39:37 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

I guess you'd have to give me some specifics on what due-process actually means if you're going to convince me. If not just man up and admit that the courts can-do just about whatever the fuck they feel like take as long as they want and arrange for any outcome theysee fit.

In this particular case due-process means obstructing anyone from finding out that the voting systems in all these States have been at the very least lax and at the very worst criminal.

WSS

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/due_process

The information is requested and the custodian determines whether or not they release it. Based on the custodian's decision either the requester or a third party may request the Court way in as a point of law.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/717075https://brownsboard.com/post/717075Mon, 31 Jul 2017 23:39:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:57:34 GMT]]>

@baconhound said:

Now your just arguing to argue.

I guess you'd have to give me some specifics on what due-process actually means if you're going to convince me. If not just man up and admit that the courts can-do just about whatever the fuck they feel like take as long as they want and arrange for any outcome theysee fit.

In this particular case due-process means obstructing anyone from finding out that the voting systems in all these States have been at the very least lax and at the very worst criminal.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/716981https://brownsboard.com/post/716981Mon, 31 Jul 2017 14:57:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:09:36 GMT]]>

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/716965https://brownsboard.com/post/716965Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:09:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:08:22 GMT]]>I'd say Steve was exactly on point:

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/716964https://brownsboard.com/post/716964Mon, 31 Jul 2017 13:08:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:47:24 GMT]]>

@mld-woody said:

What? Steve? Never

Pot, meet kettle........

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/716958https://brownsboard.com/post/716958Mon, 31 Jul 2017 11:47:24 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Mon, 31 Jul 2017 02:20:20 GMT]]>

@baconhound said:

Now your just arguing to argue.

What? Steve? Never

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/716932https://brownsboard.com/post/716932Mon, 31 Jul 2017 02:20:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Mon, 31 Jul 2017 02:10:23 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

Fair? Normal? Doesn't some very definitive to me.

WSS

Now your just arguing to argue.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/716928https://brownsboard.com/post/716928Mon, 31 Jul 2017 02:10:23 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Sun, 30 Jul 2017 23:49:09 GMT]]>

@baconhound said:

Due process -

  • fair treatment through the normal judicial system, especially as a citizen's entitlement.

Maybe vague in your world but not in mine. If you can't make a case for it then oh well.

Fair? Normal? Doesn't some very definitive to me.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/716914https://brownsboard.com/post/716914Sun, 30 Jul 2017 23:49:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Sat, 29 Jul 2017 21:10:34 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

Not to mention that the term due-process is so vague as to be meaningless.

WSS

Due process -

  1. fair treatment through the normal judicial system, especially as a citizen's entitlement.

Maybe vague in your world but not in mine. If you can't make a case for it then oh well.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/716790https://brownsboard.com/post/716790Sat, 29 Jul 2017 21:10:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Sat, 29 Jul 2017 14:26:25 GMT]]>

@baconhound said:

One of the main themes of the greatest document ever written by Jesus, The US Constitution, is due process. I guess that's my interpretation of it and why would my opinion be a valuable as another citizen's.

Not to mention that the term due-process is so vague as to be meaningless.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/716752https://brownsboard.com/post/716752Sat, 29 Jul 2017 14:26:25 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Fri, 28 Jul 2017 22:55:27 GMT]]>One of the main themes of the greatest document ever written by Jesus, The US Constitution, is due process. I guess that's my interpretation of it and why would my opinion be a valuable as another citizen's.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/716687https://brownsboard.com/post/716687Fri, 28 Jul 2017 22:55:27 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Fri, 28 Jul 2017 22:16:34 GMT]]>Well if the president just has to pull stats out of his ass for people to believe it

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/716676https://brownsboard.com/post/716676Fri, 28 Jul 2017 22:16:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Fri, 28 Jul 2017 15:28:22 GMT]]>Voter fraud and illegals voting are such a stain on our democracy the federal government should get involved and we need some kind of uniformity in our voting and our rules on voting in 50 states. Usually I believe in letting states decide their own issues but not on this one. Every state should have the same rules, same voting machines, procedures and rules governing voting and recounting of votes.

If the Supreme Court hadn't gotten involved in the 2000 Bush/Gore election it was obvious Florida who had an entirely democratic Florida supreme court was going to continue counting votes until the democrat Gore had won.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/716595https://brownsboard.com/post/716595Fri, 28 Jul 2017 15:28:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Fri, 28 Jul 2017 02:42:40 GMT]]>

@mld-woody said:

It's like jbluhms post is invisible

I'm assuming you didn't read it (Or maybe just didn't understand it) because it pretty much underscores every state playing CYA.

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/716541https://brownsboard.com/post/716541Fri, 28 Jul 2017 02:42:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:40:34 GMT]]>It's like jbluhms post is invisible

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/716534https://brownsboard.com/post/716534Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:40:34 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:18:36 GMT]]>

@canton-dawg said:

Must be hiding something.

No doubt. Hey if there is no voter fraud what's there to worry about California?

WSS

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/716532https://brownsboard.com/post/716532Fri, 28 Jul 2017 00:18:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Thu, 27 Jul 2017 22:08:06 GMT]]>Must be hiding something.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/716518https://brownsboard.com/post/716518Thu, 27 Jul 2017 22:08:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Surprised? on Thu, 27 Jul 2017 21:46:47 GMT]]>

@westside-steve said:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/07/26/politics/kris-kobach-alex-padilla-personal-voter-data-california/index.html

Surprised? No, not really. I wasn't surprised when 44 other states - Democrat controlled as well as Republican - refused send voter data to the Trump admin either, including our own state of Ohio: http://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/340289-19-states-refusing-to-provide-voter-data-to-trump-panel

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/716516https://brownsboard.com/post/716516Thu, 27 Jul 2017 21:46:47 GMT