<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Team grades]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	<a href="http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2732294-nfl-team-grades-for-week-1" rel="external nofollow">http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2732294-nfl-team-grades-for-week-1</a>
</p>



<p>
	WSS
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/47813/team-grades</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 02:34:02 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/47813.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 03:45:56 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:01:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	B is accurate. 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727617</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727617</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Alkid3]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Sep 2017 00:01:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:37:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tour2ma" aria-label="Profile: tour2ma">@<bdi>tour2ma</bdi></a> <a href="/post/727359">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			That's possible... and at least you were able to follow a discussion...
		</p>

		<p>
			Time to say goodbye to you for a while... again. So back to the Ghoolie-zone with you.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	<span style="color:#c0392b"><strong>YOU claimed that the Steelers were "off"...and then you said that you had proved your claim that they were "off". Yet you provided not one iota of data to even slightly evidence your claim....so much as prove it. And I call you on that...and yet you still fail to produce any data beyond your personal opinion.  So you cannot substantiate your opinion.....and you have a hissy fit (because you know I was right)....and you go all teenage chick drama queen on us?  What a tough Texan you aren't. </strong></span>
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727507</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727507</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:37:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:11:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tour2ma" aria-label="Profile: tour2ma">@<bdi>tour2ma</bdi></a> <a href="/post/727495">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Again with the Fantasypros? <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=bfe1bd7b04b" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" title=":slightly_smiling_face:" alt="🙂" /></p>

		<p>
			Not our first disagreement, won't be our last... besides we can always trade for Derrick Henry... LOW BLOW! <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f61b.png?v=bfe1bd7b04b" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--stuck_out_tongue" title=":stuck_out_tongue:" alt="😛" /></p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Finally-agreement-we can get him for a 5th (round or Wild Turkey whichever they want) cause the Titans aren't using him anyway.<img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f61b.png?v=bfe1bd7b04b" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--stuck_out_tongue" title=":stuck_out_tongue:" alt="😛" /></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727496</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727496</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[TexasAg1969]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:11:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:03:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Again with the Fantasypros? <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=bfe1bd7b04b" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" title=":slightly_smiling_face:" alt="🙂" /></p>

<p>
	Not our first disagreement, won't be our last... besides we can always trade for Derrick Henry... LOW BLOW! <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f61b.png?v=bfe1bd7b04b" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--stuck_out_tongue" title=":stuck_out_tongue:" alt="😛" /></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727495</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727495</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tour2ma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 16:03:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:50:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tour2ma" aria-label="Profile: tour2ma">@<bdi>tour2ma</bdi></a> <a href="/post/727464">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			No argument, but it doesn't take a Day One pick to land a "real RB."
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Will will agree to disagree on that, especially when it appears to be our greatest weakness. By season's end we'll know for sure whether I have got that right or not.
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.fantasypros.com/nfl/news/129986/isaiah-crowell-bottled-up-week-1.php" rel="external nofollow">https://www.fantasypros.com/nfl/news/129986/isaiah-crowell-bottled-up-week-1.php</a>
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727481</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727481</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[TexasAg1969]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:50:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:25:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tour2ma" aria-label="Profile: tour2ma">@<bdi>tour2ma</bdi></a> <a href="/post/727464">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			No argument, but it doesn't take a Day One pick to land a "real RB."
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	I'd rather have some real franchise OL. <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f609.png?v=bfe1bd7b04b" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--wink" title=":wink:" alt="😉" /></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727472</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727472</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mjp28]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:25:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:16:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/jcam222" aria-label="Profile: jcam222">@<bdi>jcam222</bdi></a> <a href="/post/727413">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Ghoolie you have posted in multiple threads that Kizer is a dim wit worthless fuck because he was sacked 7 times in his first rookie start. FYI Roethlisberger was sacked 7 his rookie season in week 11. <a href="http://www.nfl.com/player/benroethlisberger/2506109/gamelogs?season=2004" rel="external nofollow">http://www.nfl.com/player/benroethlisberger/2506109/gamelogs?season=2004</a>
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Kizer could be the QB under center all season long and help lead us to a Super Bowl win, and Duhoolie would spew his shit in multiple threads that we won in spite of Black Tarkenton.......
</p>

<p>
	Tubby is like a 14yr old girl posting bikini pics online, he's just looking for attention to mask his insecurity for always being picked last in PE, which forced him to play the harmonica. 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727467</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727467</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[D Bone]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:16:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Wed, 13 Sep 2017 14:36:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/texasag1969" aria-label="Profile: texasag1969">@<bdi>texasag1969</bdi></a> <a href="/post/727441">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Tell that to Dallas and now Jax. Bet they aren't crying much now that they have someone to take pressure off young QBs. You know me my now. Normally I'm D first. But at this moment we could use a real RB and not one with near zero vision.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	No argument, but it doesn't take a Day One pick to land a "real RB."
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727464</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727464</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tour2ma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 14:36:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Wed, 13 Sep 2017 12:29:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tour2ma" aria-label="Profile: tour2ma">@<bdi>tour2ma</bdi></a> <a href="/post/727208">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Personally I go "C" due to our major ST error plus we caught Pittsburgh on an "off day"...
		</p>

		

		<p>
			And, no, Ag... I'm not drafting a RB on Day One... <em>wouldn't be prudent...</em>
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Tell that to Dallas and now Jax. Bet they aren't crying much now that they have someone to take pressure off young QBs. You know me my now. Normally I'm D first. But at this moment we could use a real RB and not one with near zero vision.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727441</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727441</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[TexasAg1969]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 12:29:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Wed, 13 Sep 2017 03:20:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/jcam222" aria-label="Profile: jcam222">@<bdi>jcam222</bdi></a> <a href="/post/727413">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Ghoolie you have posted in multiple threads that Kizer is a dim wit worthless fuck because he was sacked 7 times in his first rookie start. FYI Roethlisberger was sacked 7 his rookie season in week 11. <a href="http://www.nfl.com/player/benroethlisberger/2506109/gamelogs?season=2004" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.nfl.com/player/benroethlisberger/2506109/gamelogs?season=2004</a>
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Don't try and bring up facts with the blowhard attention whore.  He'll just ignore it anyways.   No sense even trying.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727415</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727415</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark O]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 03:20:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Wed, 13 Sep 2017 02:39:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Ghoolie you have posted in multiple threads that Kizer is a dim wit worthless fuck because he was sacked 7 times in his first rookie start. FYI Roethlisberger was sacked 7 his rookie season in week 11. <a href="http://www.nfl.com/player/benroethlisberger/2506109/gamelogs?season=2004" rel="external nofollow">http://www.nfl.com/player/benroethlisberger/2506109/gamelogs?season=2004</a>
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727413</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727413</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jcam222]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 02:39:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:33:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/westside-steve" aria-label="Profile: westside-steve">@<bdi>westside-steve</bdi></a> <a href="/post/727152">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			<a href="http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2732294-nfl-team-grades-for-week-1" rel="external nofollow">http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2732294-nfl-team-grades-for-week-1</a>
		</p>

		

		<p>
			WSS
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	SIGH.......................... Like the Ghoolie said from before draft day.................... Kizer holds the ball too fucking long. That is not something that can be fixed, taught or conditioned out. Reflexes are reflexes. There are no drills that will speed this dullards synapses up. HE IS DIM WITTED with his release.
</p>

<p>
	That is the only part of the story that matters. Browns defense played well? No Fuck? Did they ah, play well when they had Ben pinned in the dawg pound down only by 3? OOOOPS  OOOOOPS  OOOOOPS  No, they didn't make a play.
</p>

<p>
	All this circle jerking about "what e did good?" They lost the fucking game, they got 155 yards gifted on penalties, and still could not score. This team blows. Kizer blows. He is going to get fucked up in the NFL. Big Big hits are on their way.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727369</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727369</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ghoolie]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:33:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:17:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/jcam222" aria-label="Profile: jcam222">@<bdi>jcam222</bdi></a> <a href="/post/727301">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			It may also say they just aren't as good as projected while perhaps we are better. 
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	That's possible... and at least you were able to follow a discussion...
</p>

<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/the-gipper" aria-label="Profile: the-gipper">@<bdi>the-gipper</bdi></a> <a href="/post/727272">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			<span style="color:#c0392b"><strong>Supported it with what?  Your opinion?  I see no where on this thread that you put any data</strong></span>
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Time to say goodbye to you for a while... again. So back to the Ghoolie-zone with you.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727359</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727359</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tour2ma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2017 00:17:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Tue, 12 Sep 2017 21:24:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	......"<span style="background-color:#ffffff;color:#000000">Like the Chicago Bears, the Browns did well. Even in defeat."......</span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="background-color:#ffffff;color:#000000">This is true however can not go on forever, they can and must steal a few wins as the season goes on. Still dammit 1-0 sure would have been sweet.</span>
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727305</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727305</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mjp28]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 21:24:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Tue, 12 Sep 2017 21:20:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Leveon who?
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727303</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727303</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Canton Dawg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 21:20:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Tue, 12 Sep 2017 21:14:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tour2ma" aria-label="Profile: tour2ma">@<bdi>tour2ma</bdi></a> <a href="/post/727236">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Interesting that the Steelers grade was lower than ours. Would seem to say they were "off".
		</p>

		<p>
			I wonder how many match ups produced that result? Maybe later I'll look...
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	It may also say they just aren't as good as projected while perhaps we are better. 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727301</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727301</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jcam222]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 21:14:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Tue, 12 Sep 2017 18:17:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tour2ma" aria-label="Profile: tour2ma">@<bdi>tour2ma</bdi></a> <a href="/post/727265">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Your argument... you go look if you want to support it. I've already supported mine.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	<span style="color:#c0392b"><strong>Supported it with what?  Your opinion?  I see no where on this thread that you put any data</strong></span>
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727272</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727272</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 18:17:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:45:50 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Your argument... you go look if you want to support it. I've already supported mine.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727265</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727265</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tour2ma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:45:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:15:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tour2ma" aria-label="Profile: tour2ma">@<bdi>tour2ma</bdi></a> <a href="/post/727236">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Interesting that the Steelers grade was lower than ours. Would seem to say they were "off".
		</p>

		<p>
			I wonder how many match ups produced that result? Maybe later I'll look...
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	<span style="color:#c0392b"><strong>The Steelers grade may have been lower than the Browns because except for a few positions the Browns are actually the more talented team....ergo their grade should have been lower.</strong></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="color:#c0392b"><strong>Late last season with BR and AB playing (or Bell either)....the Browns manhandled the Steelers fairly well. It was only their stupid mistakes that cost them the game.  This week the Steelers had BR, Brown and Bell....and while I think it is fair to say that BR and Brown beat us, it was also one stupid mistake that may have made the difference in the game. </strong></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="color:#c0392b"><strong>So, go look at the grade from that last game last year as well...and then this game.  And see if some kind of trend can be discerned.</strong></span>
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727250</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727250</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:15:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:03:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Interesting that the Steelers grade was lower than ours. Would seem to say they were "off".
</p>

<p>
	I wonder how many match ups produced that result? Maybe later I'll look...
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727236</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727236</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tour2ma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:03:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Tue, 12 Sep 2017 15:17:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tour2ma" aria-label="Profile: tour2ma">@<bdi>tour2ma</bdi></a> <a href="/post/727208">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Personally I go "C" due to our major ST error plus we caught Pittsburgh on an "off day"...
		</p>

		

		<p>
			And, no, Ag... I'm not drafting a RB on Day One... <em>wouldn't be prudent...</em>
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	<span style="color:#e74c3c"><strong>I don't know that the Steelers had an "off day". What was off about it?  </strong></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="color:#e74c3c"><strong>The Browns dominated the line of scrimmage on defense disallowing any significant ground game by them. Nothing off about that...that was just the Browns being better.  </strong></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="color:#e74c3c"><strong>The Steelers most dominant weapon:  the BR to AB combination  went 11 for 11 for 182 yards. Nothing off about that. (If anything it was the Browns secondary that had the "off day").   </strong></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="color:#e74c3c"><strong>The Steelers got a special teams gift....nothing off about that....again...unless you are talking about the Browns being the one's being off.   </strong></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="color:#e74c3c"><strong>As for the Steelers defense...they were not "off".  They are just middle of the road....and that is how they play. Again, nothing "off".</strong></span>
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727222</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727222</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 15:17:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Tue, 12 Sep 2017 14:57:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Personally I go "C" due to our major ST error plus we caught Pittsburgh on an "off day"...
</p>



<p>
	And, no, Ag... I'm not drafting a RB on Day One... <em>wouldn't be prudent...</em>
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727208</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727208</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tour2ma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 14:57:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Tue, 12 Sep 2017 04:37:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	" running back Isaiah Crowell showing a lack of vision, they couldn't get anything going." 
</p>

<p>
	Still my complaint about the Crow. We need an elite RB if we want things to open up for our QB. Either Guice of LSU or Barkley PSt. From CBS Sports both in the top 10 overall.
</p>

<h3>
	7. <a href="http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/2180624/derrius-guice" rel="external nofollow">Derrius Guice</a> | RB | LSU | Junior
</h3>

<p>
	Guice was more impressive than <a href="http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/players/playerpage/2131693/leonard-fournette" rel="external nofollow">Leonard Fournette</a> in 2016. It was obvious. Even in 2015, when Fournette was 100 percent healthy, Guice, then a freshman, had his fair share of eye-popping runs when he averaged 8.5 yards per carry on 51 rushes. At 5-foot-11 and 222 pounds, Guice packs plenty of power yet has sudden agility, elite vision, and deceptive breakaway speed to round out his complete game.
</p>

<h3>
	8. <a href="http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/draft/players/2185957/saquon-barkley" rel="external nofollow">Saquon Barkley</a> | RB | Penn State | Junior
</h3>

<p>
	Guice and Barkley will have a tremendous battle to take the crown as the nation's top running back in 2017. Barkley has averaged 5.7 yards per carry on his 454 rushes in his two season at Penn State, and he's scored 25 touchdowns on the ground. He's 5-foot-11 and 223 pounds and runs with a balance, low center of gravity, and the ability to make a cut on a dime. In the open field, he's dangerously elusive with keen vision, and he possesses good long speed. Barkley has "NFL feature back" written all over him.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727160</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727160</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[TexasAg1969]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 04:37:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Team grades on Tue, 12 Sep 2017 04:00:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<div style="color:#000000">
	<p>
		<span>Week 1 Opponent: </span>vs. Pittsburgh Steelers
	</p>

	<p>
		<span>Score: </span>Lost 21-18
	</p>

	<p>
		Believe it or not, the Cleveland Browns actually looked like a competent football team.
	</p>

	<p>
		Starting in his first NFL game at just 21 years old, Browns rookie quarterback DeShone Kizer made his mistakes, but he also showed some flashes of hope.
	</p>

	<p>
		Kizer was sacked seven times, and about five of those were his fault: He simply held the ball for too long. On the other hand, he showed promise in the fourth quarter, leading the Browns down the field on an eight-play, 73-yard touchdown drive.
	</p>

	<p>
		Of course he's going to make some mistakes, but it's evident that head coach Hue Jackson made the right decision in going with the rookie signal-caller over Brock Osweiler.
	</p>

	<p>
		The running game, on the other hand, was not good. Between some offensive line issues and running backs Isaiah Crowell showing a lack of vision, they couldn't get anything going.
	</p>

	<p>
		All the same, Kizer made use of his weapons. He got guys such as tight end Seth Devalve involved, and he used Corey Coleman on a crucial fourth-down conversion. Kenny Britt could have had a better day—he dropped a sure-fire first down on 3rd-and-19.
	</p>

	<p>
		On the defensive side, the Browns did their part in slowing down Steelers running back Le'Veon Bell and wide receiver Martavis Bryant. Of course, <a href="http://bleacherreport.com/antonio-brown" style="color:#3f05e0" rel="external nofollow">Antonio Brown</a> finished with, like, a billion yards, but he's not from this planet.
	</p>

	<p>
		The Browns did not allow the Steelers to get a first down for the entire first quarter. That is not something a Browns defense would have done last season. Safety Derrick Kindred had a fantastic Sunday afternoon, with a fourth-quarter interception.
	</p>

	<p>
		Like the Chicago Bears, the Browns did well. Even in defeat.
	</p>

	<p>
		<span>Week 1 Grade: </span>B
	</p>

	<p>
		<span>Season Average Grade:</span> B
	</p>

	</div>

<div style="color:#000000">
	<div>
		<div>
			<div>
				<div>
					
				</div>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/727155</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/727155</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jcam222]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2017 04:00:15 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>