@tour2ma said:

See... that was not crass at all and was funnier... but then everything is relative.

@tour2ma said:

When some people do crass, it's funny.

You are not one of those people.

You are not one of those people.

@tour2ma said:

Jesus, Gip... just took you off "Ignore" thinking you did not belong with the "other one."

Are you intent on proving me wrong to have done so?

Did you put your sense of humor on ignore as well?

@the-gipper said:

Because he needs Cialis to masterdebate with you?  And you can only get it with a prescription?

Jesus, Gip... just took you off "Ignore" thinking you did not belong with the "other one."

Are you intent on proving me wrong to have done so?

@tour2ma said:

dom...

I honestly have no clue how you can be that prescriptive at this point in the seasons.

Because he needs Cialis to masterdebate with you?  And you can only get it with a prescription?

I honestly have no clue how you can be that prescriptive at this point in the seasons.

I've been a master debater for some time now.

@texasag1969 said:

Because fish prefer some forms of bait above others.

You mean like master bait?

@tour2ma said:

How did you know that comment was for you?

Because fish prefer some forms of bait above others.

Round 1b. Best available WR

Round 2a. Best available CB

Round 2b. Best available FS

Round 2c. Best available DT

we can find some later round gems with LBers, edge rushers, TEs. but I believe the guys we got now, Schobert, Orchard, Garrett, are solid

Sheldon would benefit from having another stud DT next to him.

We need to fix our run game. I believe we can find some good Olineman in FA next year or in the draft. I wouldn't be opposed to using Pick 1b as Joe Thomas's replacement or a G/C

@texasag1969 said:

So your ruling out Kirk and Ridley now? How about St. Brown. He's 6'5" 204 lbs. Pretty skinny too.

Kirk has great size. He just happens to be average. 

@texasag1969 said:

Except Derrick Henry.

How did you know that comment was for you?

@tour2ma said:

On drafting RBs... Vision, vision, vision. I was thinking about this last nite and while you can find that quality in a power run Offense, it is simply not as assured as programs that feature the ZBS. Give me a guy that sees ZBS creases and has one-cut, plant a foot and go talent, and I guarantee you he can adapt to the power game. Vice versa carries no guarantees... something BAMA backs have shown us in recent years.

Except Derrick Henry.

@the-gipper said:

Willie Mayes Dayes Hayes?

It's official.."Woody Hayes Dayes" the boy would have rumbled in Woody's Days..Go Bucks!!  

@tour2ma said:

lol... Dayes? Well then... who the fuck is Mayes?

Willie Mayes Dayes Hayes?

@tour2ma said:

Mayes has to be having blitz p/u issues in practice. That is the only reason I can see us continuing to use Crow exclusively in run/pass situations. Mayes has better vision and hands.

TWEET! Tweet! That's A 5 yard misleading penalty on Tourma.🥷.The last 2 out of 3 game post, Tourma has "been giving us the business" on miss-spelling this mystery Mayes guy..From WOOFPack Nation..His mama named him Matthew Dayes #27...From Dayes having to earn his way up from ST's (bad read on punt block Pitts.) I would not eliminate ball security either..Can't say Dayes did not lay the ball on the ground with some fumbles..Hope to see Dayes & Duke platooned to find some more weapons..Weapons do no good on sidelines Jackson? And Tourma's is just dying laughing to be a Mama Dayes biggest Fan      

Duke's use has improved... seeing far more business as a receiver. So that tells me that our Offensive staff does not have their heads up their butts.

On the Draft... Yes, BPA, but among the positions of need. And with QB still TBD every other position has to take a backseat as of now. Are WR and RB in the mix? Sure, but so are FS, CB, LB and Edge with DT close behind. Depth of the class at any of these positions is also a factor and also TBD.

Bottom line: It's still way too early to be prescriptive about use of our Day One and Day Two picks at the position level let alone the particular player level.

On drafting RBs... Vision, vision, vision. I was thinking about this last nite and while you can find that quality in a power run Offense, it is simply not as assured as programs that feature the ZBS. Give me a guy that sees ZBS creases and has one-cut, plant a foot and go talent, and I guarantee you he can adapt to the power game. Vice versa carries no guarantees... something BAMA backs have shown us in recent years.

@clevfan4life said:

BPA period. No more drafting for need unless theres multiple high level guys at where we're picking. Im still hopeful we wont have the 1st pick so darnold is prob out of the picture for us. If barkley is there we have to take him if theres no one better on the board. We need "talent". If theres a STUD Dl or DE on the board that will have a bigger imoacy on the team than batkley, we take him. 

Too early to talk draft. We need to stop this.

CBS has a DE from LSU rated as the #1 overall prospect.....but....he seems a bit of a Barkevious Mingo clone.  Tall, skinnyish.