<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Does this mean mccarron is a done deal?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	And is that a bad thing "if" we still take a qb with the 1st pick? Hue gets a serviceable qb who knows his system and a #1 pick thst doesnt have to be thrown in from the beginning
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/48672/does-this-mean-mccarron-is-a-done-deal</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 08:59:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/48672.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 18:29:49 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does this mean mccarron is a done deal? on Fri, 08 Dec 2017 08:16:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/clevfan4life" aria-label="Profile: clevfan4life">@<bdi>clevfan4life</bdi></a> <a href="/post/753297">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			And is that a bad thing "if" we still take a qb with the 1st pick? Hue gets a serviceable qb who knows his system and a #1 pick thst doesnt have to be thrown in from the beginning
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Would seem logical at this point.  After the Haslam/Hue love-fest prior to the Cincinnati game, Dorsey might not have a lot of choice there.  He does prefer SEC talent, so he could be on board with a McCarron deal.  Still would draft a QB from a Power 5 team with #1 - so Darnold, probably.  He drafted Hogan, so he might be in.
</p>

<p>
	That would all be to appease Haslam/Hue.  Then, maybe he'll return to his nature and draft CB, LB and linemen.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/753522</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/753522</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[BrownPile]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 08:16:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does this mean mccarron is a done deal? on Fri, 08 Dec 2017 02:45:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Hogan will start now. The new guy will say, "How's Hogan been doing?" and "Start him!" <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=aee8435e68b" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" title=":slightly_smiling_face:" alt="🙂" /><img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=aee8435e68b" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" title=":slightly_smiling_face:" alt="🙂" /> Let's GOOO!
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/753451</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/753451</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[PoeticG]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 02:45:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does this mean mccarron is a done deal? on Fri, 08 Dec 2017 02:29:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/londonbrown" aria-label="Profile: londonbrown">@<bdi>londonbrown</bdi></a> <a href="/post/753354">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			A 2nd rounder for a QB that can’t beat out Andy Dalton is insane. 
		</p>

		<p>
			I give up. 
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	agree, but Kizer in the second round was pretty insane too
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/753442</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/753442</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tacosman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 02:29:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does this mean mccarron is a done deal? on Fri, 08 Dec 2017 01:10:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	McCarron has a pending appeal on whether he deserves to be UFA instead of RFA. 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/753409</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/753409</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jcam222]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 01:10:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does this mean mccarron is a done deal? on Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:04:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	No to Mccarron
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/753390</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/753390</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[BaconHound]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2017 00:04:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does this mean mccarron is a done deal? on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 21:50:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/londonbrown" aria-label="Profile: londonbrown">@<bdi>londonbrown</bdi></a> <a href="/post/753354">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			A 2nd rounder for a QB that can’t beat out Andy Dalton is insane. 
		</p>

		<p>
			I give up. 
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Thank God it didn't happen.. At least not yet , anyway...
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/753358</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/753358</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[nickers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 21:50:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does this mean mccarron is a done deal? on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 21:47:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	A 2nd rounder for a QB that can’t beat out Andy Dalton is insane. 
</p>

<p>
	I give up. 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/753354</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/753354</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[LondonBrown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 21:47:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does this mean mccarron is a done deal? on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 21:45:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/clevfan4life" aria-label="Profile: clevfan4life">@<bdi>clevfan4life</bdi></a> <a href="/post/753317">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			But its restricted right?
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	He's restricted for sure. Would the Bengals offer McCarron the nearly $4 mill a 1st round tender would entail? I don't see it, but who knows. Not an unheard amount for a back-up, but I see a 2nd round tender being more likely. 
</p>



<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/clevfan4life" aria-label="Profile: clevfan4life">@<bdi>clevfan4life</bdi></a> <a href="/post/753346">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Yeah if we can send em the 2nd 2nd rounder and britt, im all for it. And if coleman drops another TD pass they can throw him in there too
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	I'm pretty sure in this scenario, the Bengals automatically get the highest 2nd round pick. I'm pretty sure that's how it works, talking about the RFA deal that is to say.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/753353</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/753353</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jrb12711]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 21:45:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does this mean mccarron is a done deal? on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 21:33:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Yeah if we can send em the 2nd 2nd rounder and britt, im all for it. And if coleman drops another TD pass they can throw him in there too
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/753346</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/753346</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clevfan4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 21:33:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does this mean mccarron is a done deal? on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 19:46:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/clevfan4life" aria-label="Profile: clevfan4life">@<bdi>clevfan4life</bdi></a> <a href="/post/753307">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Oh he'll come cause he gets to start. Prob is the bengals arent going to gift him to their division rival, they may want too much and they know hue needs him.....
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Yes, if he's a RFA, the asking price may be too high. 
</p>

<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/logicisforsquares" aria-label="Profile: logicisforsquares">@<bdi>logicisforsquares</bdi></a> <a href="/post/753310">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			McCarron is a free agent after this season.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	But as above RFA, or UFA? Stay tuned. #33 is too much if he get a second round tender, or a first? Forget it. 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/753326</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/753326</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hoorta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 19:46:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does this mean mccarron is a done deal? on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 19:17:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/clevfan4life" aria-label="Profile: clevfan4life">@<bdi>clevfan4life</bdi></a> <a href="/post/753317">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			But its restricted right?
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	I think there is debate about it. 
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.cincyjungle.com/2017/3/2/14789008/rfa-ufa-bengals-unsure-aj-mccarron-free-agent-status-2018" rel="external nofollow">https://www.cincyjungle.com/2017/3/2/14789008/rfa-ufa-bengals-unsure-aj-mccarron-free-agent-status-2018</a>
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/753321</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/753321</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[LogicIsForSquares]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 19:17:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does this mean mccarron is a done deal? on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 19:15:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/clevfan4life" aria-label="Profile: clevfan4life">@<bdi>clevfan4life</bdi></a> <a href="/post/753318">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			No, i agree. What was it the deal again? Our 1st 2nd and a 3rd? No way. Sashi was technically right to nix that deal. But i u derstand hues position as well. It was sashi that saddled him with these bullsht qb's but it would be hue losing his job while sashi didnt have to answer for it. 
		</p>

		<p>
			I would vastly prefer mccown back over mccarron
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	<span style="background-color:#ffffff;color:#000000">The Browns had agreed to trade a second- and third-round pick to Cincinnati for McCarron at the deadline but failed to submit the proper paperwork by the 4 p.m. ET deadline Tuesday. </span>
</p>

<p>
	<a href="http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2742613-report-browns-coaches-believe-sashi-brown-purposely-botched-aj-mccarron-trade" rel="external nofollow">http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2742613-report-browns-coaches-believe-sashi-brown-purposely-botched-aj-mccarron-trade</a>
</p>

<p>
	The Garoppolo trade was done for a 2nd round pick,, and had all the Belichick blessings. 
</p>

<p>
	I agree it was good news the deal was botched. 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/753319</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/753319</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Nero]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 19:15:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does this mean mccarron is a done deal? on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 19:11:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/the-gipper" aria-label="Profile: the-gipper">@<bdi>the-gipper</bdi></a> <a href="/post/753312">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			<span style="color:#c0392b"><strong>I thought McCarron was a FA after this year? </strong></span>
		</p>

		<p>
			<span style="color:#c0392b"><strong>Don't care what you say....and it may have gotten Sashi fired, but nixing that deal for McCarron was the right thing to do.  They were offering way, way too much.</strong></span>
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	No, i agree. What was it the deal again? Our 1st 2nd and a 3rd? No way. Sashi was technically right to nix that deal. But i u derstand hues position as well. It was sashi that saddled him with these bullsht qb's but it would be hue losing his job while sashi didnt have to answer for it. 
</p>

<p>
	I would vastly prefer mccown back over mccarron
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/753318</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/753318</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clevfan4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 19:11:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does this mean mccarron is a done deal? on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 19:08:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/logicisforsquares" aria-label="Profile: logicisforsquares">@<bdi>logicisforsquares</bdi></a> <a href="/post/753310">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			McCarron is a free agent after this season.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	But its restricted right?
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/753317</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/753317</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clevfan4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 19:08:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does this mean mccarron is a done deal? on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 18:55:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/clevfan4life" aria-label="Profile: clevfan4life">@<bdi>clevfan4life</bdi></a> <a href="/post/753307">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Oh he'll come cause he gets to start. Prob is the bengals arent going to gift him to their division rival, they may want too much and they know hue needs him.....
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	<span style="color:#c0392b"><strong>I thought McCarron was a FA after this year? </strong></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="color:#c0392b"><strong>Don't care what you say....and it may have gotten Sashi fired, but nixing that deal for McCarron was the right thing to do.  They were offering way, way too much.</strong></span>
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/753312</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/753312</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 18:55:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does this mean mccarron is a done deal? on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 18:54:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/clevfan4life" aria-label="Profile: clevfan4life">@<bdi>clevfan4life</bdi></a> <a href="/post/753307">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Oh he'll come cause he gets to start. Prob is the bengals arent going to gift him to their division rival, they may want too much and they know hue needs him.....
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	McCarron is a free agent after this season.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/753310</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/753310</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[LogicIsForSquares]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 18:54:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does this mean mccarron is a done deal? on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 18:47:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Oh he'll come cause he gets to start. Prob is the bengals arent going to gift him to their division rival, they may want too much and they know hue needs him.....
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/753307</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/753307</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clevfan4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 18:47:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does this mean mccarron is a done deal? on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 18:33:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I wouldn't hate a McCarron/Rosen/ Kizer QB room. I just don't know if McCarron would come here at this point. 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/753298</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/753298</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[LogicIsForSquares]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2017 18:33:32 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>