<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	<a href="https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/5235763/niagara-falls-frozen-temperature-united-states-mars-freezing/" rel="external nofollow">https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/5235763/niagara-falls-frozen-temperature-united-states-mars-freezing/</a>
</p>

<p>
	yep. global warming is just a global wealth redistribution fraud.
</p>

<p>
	and, a political power calling card for the left.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/48919/big-news-despite-fake-mmgw-lol-niagra-falls-freezes</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:57:59 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/48919.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2017 00:30:22 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Thu, 04 Jan 2018 02:18:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	<a href="http://www.theblaze.com/video/watch-science-writer-points-out-what-were-all-thinking-about-climate-change-experts" rel="external nofollow">http://www.theblaze.com/video/watch-science-writer-points-out-what-were-all-thinking-about-climate-change-experts</a>
</p>

<p>
	the left happily breaks laws if it's to their own advantage. and happily falsely claim that
</p>

<p>
	the right has broken laws so terrible...even when it isn't true.
</p>

<p>
	and the left uses anything they want to, to further the emotional levers they try to create for more
</p>

<p>
	power and wealth. Then they deny the levers if they work to their disadvantage.
</p>

<p>
	100% emotional control is the left - there is no room for common sense and honesty.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/761383</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/761383</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2018 02:18:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Wed, 03 Jan 2018 23:36:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/clevfan4life" aria-label="Profile: clevfan4life">@<bdi>clevfan4life</bdi></a> <a href="/post/761258">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			A mini ice age that wouldnt last long because it was caused by warming. A seeming paradox that has been adequately explained by jetstream loss. If u cant wrap ur head around it im sorry for yr deficiency in intellect. 
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	You mean the the guys that said that the coming ice age that was going to cause the end of the world was wrong??
</p>

<p>
	And you’re calling me intellectually deficient... let that sink in.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/761312</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/761312</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Canton Dawg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 23:36:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Wed, 03 Jan 2018 20:10:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/canton-dawg" aria-label="Profile: canton-dawg">@<bdi>canton-dawg</bdi></a> <a href="/post/761191">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Those 2 don't realize this is the same group of guys that proclaimed the coming of another ice age back in the 1970's.
		</p>

		<p>
			They were wrong then...and they are wrong now. 
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	A mini ice age that wouldnt last long because it was caused by warming. A seeming paradox that has been adequately explained by jetstream loss. If u cant wrap ur head around it im sorry for yr deficiency in intellect. 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/761258</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/761258</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clevfan4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 20:10:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Wed, 03 Jan 2018 20:06:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/calfoxwc" aria-label="Profile: calfoxwc">@<bdi>calfoxwc</bdi></a> <a href="/post/761101">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			in years past, the liberal evidence was from salon, move on, obamao, al gore, and
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Climate research precedes the internet by decades u dotard. Do u ever think before u tyoe? Ever?
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/761257</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/761257</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clevfan4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 20:06:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Wed, 03 Jan 2018 16:59:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/stinkhole" aria-label="Profile: stinkhole">@<bdi>stinkhole</bdi></a> <a href="/post/761113">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Stuart
		</p>

		<p>
			Not quite. It goes back much farther than that you simpleton.
		</p>

		<p>
			I find it utterly astonishing that even half wits like you and Woodley cant make the connection between "mmgw" alarmism and the redistribution of wealth.
		</p>

		<p>
			This is a progressive scheme to re-distribute the worlds wealth by riding on the back of meaningless 120ppm of Co2 emitted by humans since the industrial revolution, then feeding to the gullible populous that this elevated Co2 will bring about a doomsday if we don't do anything.
		</p>

		<p>
			The fact remains that if all emissions would cease, nothing would change.
		</p>

		<p>
			Thank God for Trump in recognizing this scam pulling us out while saving  $3 Trillion in taxpayer dollars...or whatever the amount was to be distributed.
		</p>

		

		<p>
			<span><span>That’s the gist of an amazing chronology of the last 120 years of scare-mongering on climate, assembled by <a href="http://butnowyouknow.net/those-who-fail-to-learn-from-history/climate-change-timeline/" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">butnowyouknow.net</span></u></a> and reprinted by the estimable Anthony Watts in <a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/07/29/a-brief-history-of-climate-panic-and-crisis-both-warming-and-cooling/" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">Wattsupwiththat</span></u></a>, who updates it to the present. It is truly mind-boggling:</span></span>
		</p>

		<div>
			<div>
				<div>
					<blockquote>
						<ul><li>
								<span><span><strong>1895</strong> - <em>Geologists Think the</em> <em>World May Be Frozen Up Again</em> – <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9F02E1D8163CE433A25757C2A9649C94649ED7CF" rel="external nofollow" title="PROSPECTS OF ANOTHER GLACIAL PERIOD; Geologists Think the World May Be Frozen Up Again."><u><span style="color:#0066cc">New York Times, February 1895</span></u></a></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1902</strong> - “Disappearing Glaciers…deteriorating slowly, with a persistency that means their final annihilation…scientific fact…surely disappearing.” – <strong>Los Angeles Times</strong></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1912</strong> - <em>Prof. Schmidt Warns Us of an Encroaching Ice Age</em> – <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9A04EED7113AE633A25754C0A9669D946396D6CF" rel="external nofollow" title="SEES GLACIAL ERA COMING.; Prof. Schmidt Warns Us of an Encroaching Ice Age."><u><span style="color:#0066cc">New York Times, October 1912</span></u></a></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1923</strong> - “Scientist says Arctic ice will wipe out Canada” – Professor Gregory of Yale University, American representative to the Pan-Pacific Science Congress, – <strong>Chicago Tribune</strong></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1923</strong> - “The discoveries of changes in the sun’s heat and the southward advance of glaciers in recent years have given rise to conjectures of the possible advent of a new ice age” – <strong>Washington Post</strong></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1924</strong> - <em>MacMillan Reports Signs of New Ice Age</em> – <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FA0C14FB3C5B12738DDDA10A94D1405B848EF1D3&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=%93MacMillan+Reports+Signs%22&amp;st=p" rel="external nofollow" title="MACMILLAN REPORTS SIGNS OF NEW ICE AGE; Explorer Brings Word of Unusual Movements of Greenland Glaciers -- Coal Deposits Show Polar Climate Was Once Tropical"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">New York Times, Sept 18, 1924</span></u></a></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1929</strong> - “Most geologists think the world is growing warmer, and that it will continue to get warmer” – <strong>Los Angeles Times</strong>, in <em>Is another ice age coming?</em></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1932</strong> - “If these things be true, it is evident, therefore that we must be just teetering on an ice age” – <strong>The Atlantic</strong> magazine, <em>This Cold, Cold World</em></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1933</strong> - <em>America in Longest Warm Spell Since 1776; Temperature Line Records a 25-Year Rise</em> – <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F00617FF3D5E1A7A93C5AB1788D85F478385F9&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=%22America+in+Longest+Warm+Spell+Since+1776%22&amp;st=p" rel="external nofollow" title="America in Longest Warm Spell Since 1776; Temperature Line Records a 25-Year Rise"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">New York Times, March 27th, 1933</span></u></a></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1933</strong> – “…wide-spread and persistent tendency toward warmer weather…Is our climate changing?” – <strong>Federal Weather Bureau</strong> “Monthly Weather Review.”</span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1938</strong> - Global warming, caused by man heating the planet with carbon dioxide, “is likely to prove beneficial to mankind in several ways, besides the provision of heat and power.”– Quarterly Journal of the <strong>Royal Meteorological Society</strong></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1938</strong> - “Experts puzzle over 20 year mercury rise…Chicago is in the front rank of thousands of cities thuout the world which have been affected by a mysterious trend toward warmer climate in the last two decades” – <strong>Chicago Tribune</strong></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1939</strong> - “Gaffers who claim that winters were harder when they were boys are quite right… weather men have no doubt that the world at least for the time being is growing warmer” – <strong>Washington Post</strong></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1952</strong> - “…we have learned that the world has been getting warmer in the last half century” – <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20E1EF6345A107B93C2A81783D85F468585F9&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=%22has+been+getting+warmer+in+the+last+half+century%22&amp;st=p" rel="external nofollow" title="OUR CHANGING CLIMATE"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">New York Times, August 10th, 1962</span></u></a></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1954</strong> - “…winters are getting milder, summers drier. Glaciers are receding, deserts growing” – <strong>U.S. News and World Report</strong></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1954</strong> - <em>Climate – the Heat May Be Off</em> – <strong>Fortune Magazine</strong></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1959</strong> - “Arctic Findings in Particular Support Theory of Rising Global Temperatures” – <strong>New York Times</strong></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1969</strong> - “…the Arctic pack ice is thinning and that the ocean at the North Pole may become an open sea within a decade or two” – <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F40A11FC3959147493C2AB1789D85F4D8685F9&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=%22Arctic+pack+ice+is+thinning+and+that+the+ocean+at+the%22&amp;st=p" rel="external nofollow" title="Expert Says Arctic Ocean Will Soon Be an Open Sea; Catastrophic Shifts in Climate Feared if Change Occurs Other Specialists See No Thinning of Polar Ice Cap"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">New York Times, February 20th, 1969</span></u></a></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1969</strong> – “If I were a gambler, I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000″ — <strong>Paul Ehrlich</strong> (while he now predicts doom from global warming, this quote only gets honorable mention, as he was talking about his crazy fear of overpopulation)</span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1970</strong> - “…get a good grip on your long johns, cold weather haters – the worst may be yet to come…there’s no relief in sight” – <strong>Washington Post</strong></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1974</strong> - Global cooling for the past forty years – <strong>Time Magazine</strong></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1974</strong> - “Climatological Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age” –<strong>Washington Post</strong></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1974</strong> - “As for the present cooling trend a number of leading climatologists have concluded that it is very bad news indeed” – <strong>Fortune</strong> magazine, who won a Science Writing Award from the American Institute of Physics for its analysis of the danger</span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1974</strong> - “…the facts of the present climate change are such that the most optimistic experts would assign near certainty to major crop failure…mass deaths by starvation, and probably anarchy and violence” – <strong>New York Times</strong></span></span>
							</li>
						</ul><p>
							<span><span>Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age</span></span>
						</p>

						<ul><li>
								<span><span><strong>1975</strong> - <em>Scientists Ponder Why World’s Climate is Changing; A Major Cooling Widely Considered to Be Inevitable</em> – <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F50B1FFD395D137B93C3AB178ED85F418785F9&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=%22Scientists+Ponder+Why+World%92s+Climate+is+Changing%22&amp;st=p" rel="external nofollow" title="Scientists Ask Why World Climate Is Changing; Major Cooling May Be Ahead; Scientists Ponder Why World's Climate Is Changing; a Major Cooling Widely Considered to Be Inevitable"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">New York Times, May 21st, 1975</span></u></a></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1975</strong> - “The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for mankind” Nigel Calder, editor, <strong>New Scientist</strong> magazine, in an article in International Wildlife Magazine</span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1976</strong> - “Even U.S. farms may be hit by cooling trend” – <strong>U.S. News and World Report</strong></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1981</strong> - Global Warming – “of an almost unprecedented magnitude” – New York Times</span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1988</strong> - I would like to draw three main conclusions. Number one, the earth is warmer in 1988 than at any time in the history of instrumental measurements. Number two, the global warming is now large enough that we can ascribe with a high degree of confidence a cause and effect relationship to the greenhouse effect. And number three, our computer climate simulations indicate that thegreenhouse effect is already large enough to begin to effect the probability of extreme events such as summer heat waves. – <strong>Jim Hansen</strong>, <a href="http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Environment/documents/2008/06/23/ClimateChangeHearing1988.pdf" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">June 1988 testimony</span></u></a> before Congress, see <a href="http://butnowyouknow.net/those-who-fail-to-learn-from-history/climate-change-timeline/#hype" rel="external nofollow" title="2003 - Emphasis on extreme scenarios may have been appropriate at one time, when the public and decision-makers were relatively unaware of the global warming issue, and energy sources such as 'synfuels,' shale oil and tar sands were receiving strong consi"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">His later quote</span></u></a> and<a href="http://butnowyouknow.net/those-who-fail-to-learn-from-history/climate-change-timeline/#horror" rel="external nofollow" title="2008 – Hansen was never muzzled even though he violated NASA’s official agency position on climate forecasting (i.e., we did not know enough to forecast climate change or mankind’s effect on it). Hansen thus embarrassed NASA by coming out with his claims"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">His superior’s objection</span></u></a> for context</span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1989</strong> -“On the one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method, in effect promising to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but – which means that we must include all doubts, the caveats, the ifs, ands and buts. On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well. And like most people we’d like to see the world a better place, which in this context translates into our working to reduce the risk of potentially disastrous climate change. To do that we need to get some broad based support, to capture the public’s imagination. That, of course, means getting loads of media coverage. <strong>So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have.</strong> This “double ethical bind” we frequently find ourselves in cannot be solved by any formula. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest. I hope that means being both.” – <strong>Stephen Schneider</strong>, lead author of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,<strong>Discover</strong> magazine, October 1989</span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1990</strong> - “We’ve got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing – in terms of economic policy and environmental policy” – <strong>Senator Timothy Wirth</strong></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1993</strong> - “Global climate change may alter temperature and rainfall patterns, many scientists fear, with uncertain consequences for agriculture.” – <strong>U.S. News and World Report</strong></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>1998</strong> - No matter if the science [of global warming] is all phony . . . climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.” —Christine Stewart, Canadian Minister of the Environment, <strong>Calgary Herald</strong>, 1998</span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>2001</strong> - “Scientists no longer doubt that global warming is happening, and almost nobody questions the fact that humans are at least partly responsible.” – <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,999630,00.html" rel="external nofollow" title="Life In The Greenhouse"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">Time Magazine, Monday, Apr. 09, 2001</span></u></a></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>2003</strong> - Emphasis on extreme scenarios may have been appropriate at one time, when the public and decision-makers were relatively unaware of the global warming issue, and energy sources such as “synfuels,” shale oil and tar sands were receiving strong consideration” – <strong>Jim Hansen</strong>, NASA Global Warming activist, <a href="http://naturalscience.com/ns/articles/01-16/ns_jeh6.html" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">Can we defuse The Global Warming Time Bomb?</span></u></a>, 2003</span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>2006</strong> - “I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the audience to listen to what the solutions are, and how hopeful it is that we are going to solve this crisis.” — Al Gore, <a href="http://www.grist.org/news/maindish/2006/05/09/roberts/index.html" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">Grist magazine, May 2006</span></u></a></span></span>
							</li>
						</ul><ul><li>
								<span><span><strong>2006</strong> – “It is not a debate over whether the earth has been warming over the past century. The earth is always warming or cooling, at least a few tenths of a degree…” —<strong>Richard S. Lindzen</strong>, the Alfred P. Sloan <strong>professor of meteorology</strong> at <strong>MIT</strong></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>2006</strong> – “What we have fundamentally forgotten is simple primary school science. Climate always changes. It is always…warming or cooling, it’s never stable. And if it were stable, it would actually be interesting scientifically because it would be the first time for four and a half billion years.” —<strong>Philip Stott</strong>, emeritus professor of bio-geography at the <strong>University of London</strong></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>2006</strong> - “Since 1895, the media has alternated between global cooling and warming scares during four separate and sometimes overlapping time periods. From 1895 until the 1930’s the media peddled a coming ice age. From the late 1920’s until the 1960’s they warned of global warming. From the 1950’s until the 1970’s they warned us again of a coming ice age. This makes modern global warming the fourth estate’s fourth attempt to promote opposing climate change fears during the last 100 years.” –<a href="http://epw.senate.gov/speechitem.cfm?party=rep&amp;id=263759" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">Senator James Inhofe</span></u></a>, Monday, September 25, 2006</span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>2007</strong>- “I gave a talk recently (on fallacies of global warming) and three members of the Canadian government, the environmental cabinet, came up afterwards and said, ‘We agree with you, but it’s not worth our jobs to say anything.’ So what’s being created is a huge industry with billions of dollars of government money and people’s jobs dependent on it.” – <strong>Dr. Tim Ball</strong>, Coast-to-Coast, Feb 6, 2007</span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>2008</strong> – “Hansen was never muzzled even though he violated NASA’s official agency position on climate forecasting (i.e., we did not know enough to forecast climate change or mankind’s effect on it). Hansen thus embarrassed NASA by coming out with his claims of global warming in 1988 in his testimony before Congress” – <strong>Dr. John S. Theon</strong>, retired <strong>Chief of the Climate Processes Research Program</strong> at<strong>NASA</strong>, see above for Hansen quotes</span></span>
							</li>
						</ul>

						<hr /></blockquote>

					
				</div>

				<div>
					

					<blockquote>
						<div>
							 
						</div>

						<p>
							<span><span>Section updated by Anthony:</span></span>
						</p>

						<ul><li>
								<span><span><strong>2009</strong> – <em>Climate change: melting ice will trigger wave of natural disasters.</em> Scientists at a London conference next week will warn of earthquakes, avalanches and volcanic eruptions as the atmosphere heats up and geology is altered. Even Britain could face being struck by tsunamis – “Not only are the oceans and atmosphere conspiring against us, bringing baking temperatures, more powerful storms and floods, but the crust beneath our feet seems likely to join in too,” – <strong>Professor Bill McGuire</strong>, director of the Benfield Hazard Research Centre, at University College London, – <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/sep/06/global-warming-natural-disasters-conference" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">The Guardian, Sep 2009</span></u></a>.</span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>2010</strong> – <em>What Global Warming Looks Like.</em> It was more than 5°C (about 10°F) warmer than climatology in the eastern European region including Moscow. There was an area in eastern Asia that was similarly unusually hot. The eastern part of the United States was unusually warm, although not to the degree of the hot spots in Eurasia. <strong>James Hansen</strong> – <a href="http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2010july/" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">NASA GISS, August 11, 2010</span></u></a>.</span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>2011</strong> – <em>Where Did Global Warming Go?</em> “In Washington, ‘climate change’ has become a lightning rod, it’s a four-letter word,” said <strong>Andrew J. Hoffman</strong>, director of the University of Michigan’s Erb Institute for Sustainable Development.   – <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/16/sunday-review/whatever-happened-to-global-warming.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">New York Times, Oct 15, 2011.</span></u></a></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>2012</strong> – <em>Global warming close to becoming irreversible-scientists.</em> “This is the critical decade. If we don’t get the curves turned around this decade we will cross those lines,” said <strong>Will Steffen</strong>, executive director of the Australian National University’s climate change institute, speaking at a conference in London. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/26/us-climate-thresholds-idUSBRE82P0UJ20120326" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">Reuters, Mar 26, 2012</span></u></a></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>2013</strong> – <em>Global-warming ‘proof’ is evaporating.</em>  The 2013 hurricane season just ended as one of the five quietest years since 1960. But don’t expect anyone who pointed to last year’s hurricanes as “proof” of the need to act against global warming to apologize; the warmists don’t work that way. <a href="http://nypost.com/2013/12/05/global-warming-proof-is-evaporating/" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">New York Post, Dec 5, 2013</span></u></a></span></span>
							</li>
							<li>
								<span><span><strong>2014</strong>  – <em>Climate change: It’s even worse than we thought. </em> Five years ago, the last report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change painted a gloomy picture of our planet’s future. As climate scientists gather evidence for the next report, due in 2014, Michael Le Page gives seven reasons why things are looking even grimmer. –<a href="http://www.newscientist.com/special/worse-climate" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">New Scientist</span></u></a> (undated in 2014)</span></span>
							</li>
						</ul></blockquote>

					<div>
						<hr /></div>

					
				</div>

				<div>
					
				</div>

				<div>
					 
				</div>
			</div>

			<div>
				<div>
					<div>
						<div>
							
						</div>
					</div>

					<div>
						 
					</div>
				</div>
			</div>

			<div>
				<div>
					<div>
						
					</div>
				</div>
			</div>
		</div>

		

		<div>
			
		</div>

		<div>
			 
		</div>

		
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Those 2 don't realize this is the same group of guys that proclaimed the coming of another ice age back in the 1970's.
</p>

<p>
	They were wrong then...and they are wrong now. 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/761191</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/761191</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Canton Dawg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 16:59:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Wed, 03 Jan 2018 11:11:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/clevfan4life" aria-label="Profile: clevfan4life">@<bdi>clevfan4life</bdi></a> <a href="/post/760594">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			The election happened a year ago,<strong> gw research goes back to the 70's and early 80's when i was a kid. So this is why i dont read ur mountain of useless copy/paste</strong>. Back when there was no lib money behind anything, people were sounding the warning bells and these arctic cold blasts i read about as a child in the 80's that would be the predicted outcome of the jetstream loss. All of this is settled science. The nonsense fake blurbs you post from fake nonsensical blurbing people is irrelevant to me
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Stuart
</p>

<p>
	Not quite. It goes back much farther than that you simpleton.
</p>

<p>
	I find it utterly astonishing that even half wits like you and Woodley cant make the connection between "mmgw" alarmism and the redistribution of wealth.
</p>

<p>
	This is a progressive scheme to re-distribute the worlds wealth by riding on the back of meaningless 120ppm of Co2 emitted by humans since the industrial revolution, then feeding to the gullible populous that this elevated Co2 will bring about a doomsday if we don't do anything.
</p>

<p>
	The fact remains that if all emissions would cease, nothing would change.
</p>

<p>
	Thank God for Trump in recognizing this scam pulling us out while saving  $3 Trillion in taxpayer dollars...or whatever the amount was to be distributed.
</p>



<p>
	<span><span>That’s the gist of an amazing chronology of the last 120 years of scare-mongering on climate, assembled by <a href="http://butnowyouknow.net/those-who-fail-to-learn-from-history/climate-change-timeline/" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">butnowyouknow.net</span></u></a> and reprinted by the estimable Anthony Watts in <a href="http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/07/29/a-brief-history-of-climate-panic-and-crisis-both-warming-and-cooling/" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">Wattsupwiththat</span></u></a>, who updates it to the present. It is truly mind-boggling:</span></span>
</p>

<div>
	<div>
		<div>
			<blockquote>
				<ul><li>
						<span><span><strong>1895</strong> - <em>Geologists Think the</em> <em>World May Be Frozen Up Again</em> – <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9F02E1D8163CE433A25757C2A9649C94649ED7CF" rel="external nofollow" title="PROSPECTS OF ANOTHER GLACIAL PERIOD; Geologists Think the World May Be Frozen Up Again."><u><span style="color:#0066cc">New York Times, February 1895</span></u></a></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1902</strong> - “Disappearing Glaciers…deteriorating slowly, with a persistency that means their final annihilation…scientific fact…surely disappearing.” – <strong>Los Angeles Times</strong></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1912</strong> - <em>Prof. Schmidt Warns Us of an Encroaching Ice Age</em> – <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9A04EED7113AE633A25754C0A9669D946396D6CF" rel="external nofollow" title="SEES GLACIAL ERA COMING.; Prof. Schmidt Warns Us of an Encroaching Ice Age."><u><span style="color:#0066cc">New York Times, October 1912</span></u></a></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1923</strong> - “Scientist says Arctic ice will wipe out Canada” – Professor Gregory of Yale University, American representative to the Pan-Pacific Science Congress, – <strong>Chicago Tribune</strong></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1923</strong> - “The discoveries of changes in the sun’s heat and the southward advance of glaciers in recent years have given rise to conjectures of the possible advent of a new ice age” – <strong>Washington Post</strong></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1924</strong> - <em>MacMillan Reports Signs of New Ice Age</em> – <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FA0C14FB3C5B12738DDDA10A94D1405B848EF1D3&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=%93MacMillan+Reports+Signs%22&amp;st=p" rel="external nofollow" title="MACMILLAN REPORTS SIGNS OF NEW ICE AGE; Explorer Brings Word of Unusual Movements of Greenland Glaciers -- Coal Deposits Show Polar Climate Was Once Tropical"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">New York Times, Sept 18, 1924</span></u></a></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1929</strong> - “Most geologists think the world is growing warmer, and that it will continue to get warmer” – <strong>Los Angeles Times</strong>, in <em>Is another ice age coming?</em></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1932</strong> - “If these things be true, it is evident, therefore that we must be just teetering on an ice age” – <strong>The Atlantic</strong> magazine, <em>This Cold, Cold World</em></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1933</strong> - <em>America in Longest Warm Spell Since 1776; Temperature Line Records a 25-Year Rise</em> – <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F00617FF3D5E1A7A93C5AB1788D85F478385F9&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=%22America+in+Longest+Warm+Spell+Since+1776%22&amp;st=p" rel="external nofollow" title="America in Longest Warm Spell Since 1776; Temperature Line Records a 25-Year Rise"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">New York Times, March 27th, 1933</span></u></a></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1933</strong> – “…wide-spread and persistent tendency toward warmer weather…Is our climate changing?” – <strong>Federal Weather Bureau</strong> “Monthly Weather Review.”</span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1938</strong> - Global warming, caused by man heating the planet with carbon dioxide, “is likely to prove beneficial to mankind in several ways, besides the provision of heat and power.”– Quarterly Journal of the <strong>Royal Meteorological Society</strong></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1938</strong> - “Experts puzzle over 20 year mercury rise…Chicago is in the front rank of thousands of cities thuout the world which have been affected by a mysterious trend toward warmer climate in the last two decades” – <strong>Chicago Tribune</strong></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1939</strong> - “Gaffers who claim that winters were harder when they were boys are quite right… weather men have no doubt that the world at least for the time being is growing warmer” – <strong>Washington Post</strong></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1952</strong> - “…we have learned that the world has been getting warmer in the last half century” – <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F20E1EF6345A107B93C2A81783D85F468585F9&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=%22has+been+getting+warmer+in+the+last+half+century%22&amp;st=p" rel="external nofollow" title="OUR CHANGING CLIMATE"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">New York Times, August 10th, 1962</span></u></a></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1954</strong> - “…winters are getting milder, summers drier. Glaciers are receding, deserts growing” – <strong>U.S. News and World Report</strong></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1954</strong> - <em>Climate – the Heat May Be Off</em> – <strong>Fortune Magazine</strong></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1959</strong> - “Arctic Findings in Particular Support Theory of Rising Global Temperatures” – <strong>New York Times</strong></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1969</strong> - “…the Arctic pack ice is thinning and that the ocean at the North Pole may become an open sea within a decade or two” – <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F40A11FC3959147493C2AB1789D85F4D8685F9&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=%22Arctic+pack+ice+is+thinning+and+that+the+ocean+at+the%22&amp;st=p" rel="external nofollow" title="Expert Says Arctic Ocean Will Soon Be an Open Sea; Catastrophic Shifts in Climate Feared if Change Occurs Other Specialists See No Thinning of Polar Ice Cap"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">New York Times, February 20th, 1969</span></u></a></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1969</strong> – “If I were a gambler, I would take even money that England will not exist in the year 2000″ — <strong>Paul Ehrlich</strong> (while he now predicts doom from global warming, this quote only gets honorable mention, as he was talking about his crazy fear of overpopulation)</span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1970</strong> - “…get a good grip on your long johns, cold weather haters – the worst may be yet to come…there’s no relief in sight” – <strong>Washington Post</strong></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1974</strong> - Global cooling for the past forty years – <strong>Time Magazine</strong></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1974</strong> - “Climatological Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age” –<strong>Washington Post</strong></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1974</strong> - “As for the present cooling trend a number of leading climatologists have concluded that it is very bad news indeed” – <strong>Fortune</strong> magazine, who won a Science Writing Award from the American Institute of Physics for its analysis of the danger</span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1974</strong> - “…the facts of the present climate change are such that the most optimistic experts would assign near certainty to major crop failure…mass deaths by starvation, and probably anarchy and violence” – <strong>New York Times</strong></span></span>
					</li>
				</ul><p>
					<span><span>Cassandras are becoming increasingly apprehensive, for the weather aberrations they are studying may be the harbinger of another ice age</span></span>
				</p>

				<ul><li>
						<span><span><strong>1975</strong> - <em>Scientists Ponder Why World’s Climate is Changing; A Major Cooling Widely Considered to Be Inevitable</em> – <a href="http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=F50B1FFD395D137B93C3AB178ED85F418785F9&amp;scp=1&amp;sq=%22Scientists+Ponder+Why+World%92s+Climate+is+Changing%22&amp;st=p" rel="external nofollow" title="Scientists Ask Why World Climate Is Changing; Major Cooling May Be Ahead; Scientists Ponder Why World's Climate Is Changing; a Major Cooling Widely Considered to Be Inevitable"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">New York Times, May 21st, 1975</span></u></a></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1975</strong> - “The threat of a new ice age must now stand alongside nuclear war as a likely source of wholesale death and misery for mankind” Nigel Calder, editor, <strong>New Scientist</strong> magazine, in an article in International Wildlife Magazine</span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1976</strong> - “Even U.S. farms may be hit by cooling trend” – <strong>U.S. News and World Report</strong></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1981</strong> - Global Warming – “of an almost unprecedented magnitude” – New York Times</span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1988</strong> - I would like to draw three main conclusions. Number one, the earth is warmer in 1988 than at any time in the history of instrumental measurements. Number two, the global warming is now large enough that we can ascribe with a high degree of confidence a cause and effect relationship to the greenhouse effect. And number three, our computer climate simulations indicate that thegreenhouse effect is already large enough to begin to effect the probability of extreme events such as summer heat waves. – <strong>Jim Hansen</strong>, <a href="http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Environment/documents/2008/06/23/ClimateChangeHearing1988.pdf" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">June 1988 testimony</span></u></a> before Congress, see <a href="http://butnowyouknow.net/those-who-fail-to-learn-from-history/climate-change-timeline/#hype" rel="external nofollow" title="2003 - Emphasis on extreme scenarios may have been appropriate at one time, when the public and decision-makers were relatively unaware of the global warming issue, and energy sources such as 'synfuels,' shale oil and tar sands were receiving strong consi"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">His later quote</span></u></a> and<a href="http://butnowyouknow.net/those-who-fail-to-learn-from-history/climate-change-timeline/#horror" rel="external nofollow" title="2008 – Hansen was never muzzled even though he violated NASA’s official agency position on climate forecasting (i.e., we did not know enough to forecast climate change or mankind’s effect on it). Hansen thus embarrassed NASA by coming out with his claims"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">His superior’s objection</span></u></a> for context</span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1989</strong> -“On the one hand, as scientists we are ethically bound to the scientific method, in effect promising to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but – which means that we must include all doubts, the caveats, the ifs, ands and buts. On the other hand, we are not just scientists but human beings as well. And like most people we’d like to see the world a better place, which in this context translates into our working to reduce the risk of potentially disastrous climate change. To do that we need to get some broad based support, to capture the public’s imagination. That, of course, means getting loads of media coverage. <strong>So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have.</strong> This “double ethical bind” we frequently find ourselves in cannot be solved by any formula. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is between being effective and being honest. I hope that means being both.” – <strong>Stephen Schneider</strong>, lead author of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change,<strong>Discover</strong> magazine, October 1989</span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1990</strong> - “We’ve got to ride the global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing – in terms of economic policy and environmental policy” – <strong>Senator Timothy Wirth</strong></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1993</strong> - “Global climate change may alter temperature and rainfall patterns, many scientists fear, with uncertain consequences for agriculture.” – <strong>U.S. News and World Report</strong></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>1998</strong> - No matter if the science [of global warming] is all phony . . . climate change [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and equality in the world.” —Christine Stewart, Canadian Minister of the Environment, <strong>Calgary Herald</strong>, 1998</span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>2001</strong> - “Scientists no longer doubt that global warming is happening, and almost nobody questions the fact that humans are at least partly responsible.” – <a href="http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,999630,00.html" rel="external nofollow" title="Life In The Greenhouse"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">Time Magazine, Monday, Apr. 09, 2001</span></u></a></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>2003</strong> - Emphasis on extreme scenarios may have been appropriate at one time, when the public and decision-makers were relatively unaware of the global warming issue, and energy sources such as “synfuels,” shale oil and tar sands were receiving strong consideration” – <strong>Jim Hansen</strong>, NASA Global Warming activist, <a href="http://naturalscience.com/ns/articles/01-16/ns_jeh6.html" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">Can we defuse The Global Warming Time Bomb?</span></u></a>, 2003</span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>2006</strong> - “I believe it is appropriate to have an over-representation of factual presentations on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the audience to listen to what the solutions are, and how hopeful it is that we are going to solve this crisis.” — Al Gore, <a href="http://www.grist.org/news/maindish/2006/05/09/roberts/index.html" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">Grist magazine, May 2006</span></u></a></span></span>
					</li>
				</ul><ul><li>
						<span><span><strong>2006</strong> – “It is not a debate over whether the earth has been warming over the past century. The earth is always warming or cooling, at least a few tenths of a degree…” —<strong>Richard S. Lindzen</strong>, the Alfred P. Sloan <strong>professor of meteorology</strong> at <strong>MIT</strong></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>2006</strong> – “What we have fundamentally forgotten is simple primary school science. Climate always changes. It is always…warming or cooling, it’s never stable. And if it were stable, it would actually be interesting scientifically because it would be the first time for four and a half billion years.” —<strong>Philip Stott</strong>, emeritus professor of bio-geography at the <strong>University of London</strong></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>2006</strong> - “Since 1895, the media has alternated between global cooling and warming scares during four separate and sometimes overlapping time periods. From 1895 until the 1930’s the media peddled a coming ice age. From the late 1920’s until the 1960’s they warned of global warming. From the 1950’s until the 1970’s they warned us again of a coming ice age. This makes modern global warming the fourth estate’s fourth attempt to promote opposing climate change fears during the last 100 years.” –<a href="http://epw.senate.gov/speechitem.cfm?party=rep&amp;id=263759" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">Senator James Inhofe</span></u></a>, Monday, September 25, 2006</span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>2007</strong>- “I gave a talk recently (on fallacies of global warming) and three members of the Canadian government, the environmental cabinet, came up afterwards and said, ‘We agree with you, but it’s not worth our jobs to say anything.’ So what’s being created is a huge industry with billions of dollars of government money and people’s jobs dependent on it.” – <strong>Dr. Tim Ball</strong>, Coast-to-Coast, Feb 6, 2007</span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>2008</strong> – “Hansen was never muzzled even though he violated NASA’s official agency position on climate forecasting (i.e., we did not know enough to forecast climate change or mankind’s effect on it). Hansen thus embarrassed NASA by coming out with his claims of global warming in 1988 in his testimony before Congress” – <strong>Dr. John S. Theon</strong>, retired <strong>Chief of the Climate Processes Research Program</strong> at<strong>NASA</strong>, see above for Hansen quotes</span></span>
					</li>
				</ul>

				<hr /></blockquote>

			
		</div>

		<div>
			

			<blockquote>
				<div>
					 
				</div>

				<p>
					<span><span>Section updated by Anthony:</span></span>
				</p>

				<ul><li>
						<span><span><strong>2009</strong> – <em>Climate change: melting ice will trigger wave of natural disasters.</em> Scientists at a London conference next week will warn of earthquakes, avalanches and volcanic eruptions as the atmosphere heats up and geology is altered. Even Britain could face being struck by tsunamis – “Not only are the oceans and atmosphere conspiring against us, bringing baking temperatures, more powerful storms and floods, but the crust beneath our feet seems likely to join in too,” – <strong>Professor Bill McGuire</strong>, director of the Benfield Hazard Research Centre, at University College London, – <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2009/sep/06/global-warming-natural-disasters-conference" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">The Guardian, Sep 2009</span></u></a>.</span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>2010</strong> – <em>What Global Warming Looks Like.</em> It was more than 5°C (about 10°F) warmer than climatology in the eastern European region including Moscow. There was an area in eastern Asia that was similarly unusually hot. The eastern part of the United States was unusually warm, although not to the degree of the hot spots in Eurasia. <strong>James Hansen</strong> – <a href="http://data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/2010july/" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">NASA GISS, August 11, 2010</span></u></a>.</span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>2011</strong> – <em>Where Did Global Warming Go?</em> “In Washington, ‘climate change’ has become a lightning rod, it’s a four-letter word,” said <strong>Andrew J. Hoffman</strong>, director of the University of Michigan’s Erb Institute for Sustainable Development.   – <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/16/sunday-review/whatever-happened-to-global-warming.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">New York Times, Oct 15, 2011.</span></u></a></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>2012</strong> – <em>Global warming close to becoming irreversible-scientists.</em> “This is the critical decade. If we don’t get the curves turned around this decade we will cross those lines,” said <strong>Will Steffen</strong>, executive director of the Australian National University’s climate change institute, speaking at a conference in London. <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/26/us-climate-thresholds-idUSBRE82P0UJ20120326" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">Reuters, Mar 26, 2012</span></u></a></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>2013</strong> – <em>Global-warming ‘proof’ is evaporating.</em>  The 2013 hurricane season just ended as one of the five quietest years since 1960. But don’t expect anyone who pointed to last year’s hurricanes as “proof” of the need to act against global warming to apologize; the warmists don’t work that way. <a href="http://nypost.com/2013/12/05/global-warming-proof-is-evaporating/" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">New York Post, Dec 5, 2013</span></u></a></span></span>
					</li>
					<li>
						<span><span><strong>2014</strong>  – <em>Climate change: It’s even worse than we thought. </em> Five years ago, the last report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change painted a gloomy picture of our planet’s future. As climate scientists gather evidence for the next report, due in 2014, Michael Le Page gives seven reasons why things are looking even grimmer. –<a href="http://www.newscientist.com/special/worse-climate" rel="external nofollow"><u><span style="color:#0066cc">New Scientist</span></u></a> (undated in 2014)</span></span>
					</li>
				</ul></blockquote>

			<div>
				<hr /></div>

			
		</div>

		<div>
			
		</div>

		<div>
			 
		</div>
	</div>

	<div>
		<div>
			<div>
				<div>
					
				</div>
			</div>

			<div>
				 
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>

	<div>
		<div>
			<div>
				
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>



<div>
	
</div>

<div>
	 
</div>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/761113</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/761113</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[StinkHole]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 11:11:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Wed, 03 Jan 2018 05:39:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	in years past, the liberal evidence was from salon, move on, obamao, al gore, and
</p>

<p>
	scientists, some of whom admit they were wrong. Flawed "studies". Blackballed counter scientific studies
</p>

<p>
	that threatened the redistribution of wealth goals by the UN.... tree ring scandal, emails scandal...
</p>

<p>
	all the quotes... the fake movie by al gore, who finally had to admit the "melting iceberg" was styrofoam...
</p>

<p>
	the list goes on. It was never refuted, just assumptions made and demanded to be "true".
</p>

<p>
	they were wrong. oops.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/761101</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/761101</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 05:39:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Wed, 03 Jan 2018 04:48:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/canton-dawg" aria-label="Profile: canton-dawg">@<bdi>canton-dawg</bdi></a> <a href="/post/761007">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			In the mean time, you have yet to show one iota of evidence to support your claim...carry on.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Oh we've been showing plenty of iota's. Research that dated back decades when al gore was still playing beer pong in some frat house. You dont get to act now like we havent been over this for years
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/761090</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/761090</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clevfan4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 04:48:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Wed, 03 Jan 2018 02:08:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/mld-woody" aria-label="Profile: mld-woody">@<bdi>mld-woody</bdi></a> <a href="/post/760983">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			It's funny because they think they're really driving their point home. Little do they know, it's just driving home the point we're making about them...
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	^^^^^^
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/761058</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/761058</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clevfan4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2018 02:08:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Tue, 02 Jan 2018 23:39:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/mld-woody" aria-label="Profile: mld-woody">@<bdi>mld-woody</bdi></a> <a href="/post/760983">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			It's funny because they think they're really driving their point home. Little do they know, it's just driving home the point we're making about them...
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	In the mean time, you have yet to show one iota of evidence to support your claim...carry on.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/761007</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/761007</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Canton Dawg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 23:39:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Tue, 02 Jan 2018 22:33:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	yep. can't refute the quotes. They prove that so many are absolutely willing to use mmgw as a tool,
</p>

<p>
	for redistribution of wealth, and political sway on elections.
</p>

<p>
	which lends itself to falsehood right there. And the scientists who emphatically state that nothing
</p>

<p>
	has been proven that mankind is causing anything like mmgw is also a serious blow to mmgw blowhards.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/760997</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/760997</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 22:33:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Tue, 02 Jan 2018 20:37:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	It's funny because they think they're really driving their point home. Little do they know, it's just driving home the point we're making about them...
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/760983</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/760983</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MLD Woody]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 20:37:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Tue, 02 Jan 2018 18:39:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/calfoxwc" aria-label="Profile: calfoxwc">@<bdi>calfoxwc</bdi></a> <a href="/post/760826">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			and not one word about all those glaring, serious quotes that show what mmgw really is.
		</p>

		<p>
			hardy har har har har.
		</p>

		<p>
			what a cult.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	First off a "quote" doest refute anything. But if ud like to pull obe out of that crap slap andpost it fine, but im not reading ur board polluting sht. U make threads imposdible to scroll through, i dont know why u feel the need to constantly do thay
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/760958</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/760958</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clevfan4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 18:39:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Tue, 02 Jan 2018 18:37:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Yeah bill nye is some recent opportunist, this goes back tomthe 70's and 80's before al gore gave a fuk. Thats why its real. People were studying it before there was a dime of spec interest money on either side
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/760957</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/760957</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clevfan4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 18:37:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Tue, 02 Jan 2018 17:05:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/clevfan4life" aria-label="Profile: clevfan4life">@<bdi>clevfan4life</bdi></a> <a href="/post/760805">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			no he has a degree in engineering....so it totally qualifies his opinion on climate change to be documented in these papers that conservatives pass around. They literally walk up to people with science degrees, even psychologists.....and ask them what they think of GW. If they give the correct response their names go "on the list"......Chris Jericho literally pops out from around a corner and tells em "you just made the list" if they give the right answer. 
		</p>

		<p></p><div class="embed-wrapper"><div class="embed-container"><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/x5lB-ROwpO8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div></div><p></p>

		
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	You mean like Bill Nye...the self proclaimed science guy?
</p>

<p>
	I have a degree that I acquired long before Woody was "the wet spot" on his parent's mattress, and I don't qualify?
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/760942</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/760942</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Canton Dawg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 17:05:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Tue, 02 Jan 2018 14:28:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	<a href="https://www.ammoland.com/2018/01/global-w-w-warming/?utm_source=Ammoland+Subscribers&amp;utm_campaign=afb656069a-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_term=0_6f6fac3eaa-afb656069a-20770865#axzz52wVR0RlL" rel="external nofollow">https://www.ammoland.com/2018/01/global-w-w-warming/?utm_source=Ammoland+Subscribers&amp;utm_campaign=afb656069a-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_term=0_6f6fac3eaa-afb656069a-20770865#axzz52wVR0RlL</a>
</p>

<p>
	<img alt="Ramirez-Global-W-W-Warming.jpg" height="436" src="https://www.ammoland.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Ramirez-Global-W-W-Warming.jpg" width="600" /></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/760901</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/760901</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 14:28:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Tue, 02 Jan 2018 05:59:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	and not one word about all those glaring, serious quotes that show what mmgw really is.
</p>

<p>
	hardy har har har har.
</p>

<p>
	what a cult.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/760826</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/760826</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 05:59:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Tue, 02 Jan 2018 04:14:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/canton-dawg" aria-label="Profile: canton-dawg">@<bdi>canton-dawg</bdi></a> <a href="/post/760615">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			I think you’re on a totally different list.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	no he has a degree in engineering....so it totally qualifies his opinion on climate change to be documented in these papers that conservatives pass around. They literally walk up to people with science degrees, even psychologists.....and ask them what they think of GW. If they give the correct response their names go "on the list"......Chris Jericho literally pops out from around a corner and tells em "you just made the list" if they give the right answer. 
</p>

<p></p><div class="embed-wrapper"><div class="embed-container"><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/x5lB-ROwpO8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div></div><p></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/760805</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/760805</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clevfan4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2018 04:14:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Mon, 01 Jan 2018 20:50:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Over the past century, atmospheric CO2 has increased by one part per ten thousand. That is equivalent to packing an extra ten people into the Rose Bowl.
</p>

<p>
	@l_lucullus calls this a "huge addition of CO2"<br />
	realclimatescience.com/2018/01/visual…
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/760620</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/760620</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Canton Dawg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 20:50:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Mon, 01 Jan 2018 20:40:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/mld-woody" aria-label="Profile: mld-woody">@<bdi>mld-woody</bdi></a> <a href="/post/760604">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Is that the list that's been passed around on here a dozen times? The list that means nothing? The list that I can be on?
		</p>

		

		<p>
			Lol
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	I think you’re on a totally different list.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/760615</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/760615</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Canton Dawg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 20:40:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Mon, 01 Jan 2018 20:23:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Cal, admit the NAS is a conservative bias group and then we can move forward.
</p>



<p>
	Passing of groups as fact because they sound scientific doesn't make them a good source. That's like 4th grade English
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/760605</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/760605</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MLD Woody]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 20:23:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Mon, 01 Jan 2018 20:21:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Is that the list that's been passed around on here a dozen times? The list that means nothing? The list that I can be on?
</p>



<p>
	Lol
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/760604</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/760604</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MLD Woody]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 20:21:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Mon, 01 Jan 2018 20:19:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/clevfan4life" aria-label="Profile: clevfan4life">@<bdi>clevfan4life</bdi></a> <a href="/post/760594">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			The election happened a year ago, gw research goes back to the 70's and early 80's when i was a kid. So this is why i dont read ur mountain of useless copy/paste. Back when there was no lib money behind anything, people were sounding the warning bells and these arctic cold blasts i read about as a child in the 80's that would be the predicted outcome of the jetstream loss. All of this is settled science. The nonsense fake blurbs you post from fake nonsensical blurbing people is irrelevant to me
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	   Cleve translation:
</p>

<p>
	   "WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA ! I can't refute those damaging to our mmgw cult cause, so I will ignore them and change the subject again !"
</p>

<p>
	The quotes are not fake. You are just running scared from scary reality.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/760602</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/760602</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 20:19:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to BIG NEWS - despite fake mmgw, LOL, NIAGRA FALLS FREEZES on Mon, 01 Jan 2018 20:16:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	There are over 31,000 doctors and scientists that have signed a petition to say that they disagree with the global warming nonsense.
</p>

<p>
	Watch as the founder of the Weather Channel schools the CNN anchor.
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://mobile.twitter.com/angeloraygomez/status/947101944308424704?ref_src=twcamp%5Eshare%7Ctwsrc%5Eios%7Ctwgr%5Eother" rel="external nofollow">https://mobile.twitter.com/angeloraygomez/status/947101944308424704?ref_src=twcamp^share|twsrc^ios|twgr^other</a>
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/760596</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/760596</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Canton Dawg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 2018 20:16:12 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>