@pumpkin-eater said:

And while we're being straight the boom years of his administration were with a more balanced government.

WSS

This thread had nothing to do with fishing.

***********************************

NO. YOU GOT TO BE KIDDING OLLIE !

***********************************

Your quip about fishing led to more quips about fishing. You made a statment with

a fishing quip, so did we.

Too bad, you don't like our quips because it's on our side of the political fence.

But referring to anybody's IQ is a slur against those who are learning disabled, and

I don't appreciate that. Surely somebody as smart as you can think of a more

appropriate and non-offensive way to criticize someone's opinions..

or I am wrong about that... eh? @@

*************************************

I posted a reply to T's attempt to try and drudge up anything he can find to slam the President and I simply stated that T was fishing for a story hence the joke.

**************************************

We were making silly political points by mocking your analogy. What goes around, comes around, Dan.

**************************************

You either dont bother to read threads or cant comprehend what your reading which is why I followed up with the IQ joke.

**************************************

I know you made the IQ joke BECAUSE I read it. I know why you did, and I

am offended by the personal IQ slurs, especially when there are a few others

who want to slap others in the face with their education as a cya.

**************************************

Im not slamming or making personal attacks but if you cant get up to speed on whats going on around here maybe it is a personal attack....

**************************************

It is a personal attack. Your assumptions are not valid. See? If I said "Your ASS-umptions are not valid" that

would be a personal attack.

If you can't get up to speed on discourse without personal attacks, maybe you should personally attack yourself

to get the point.

I have to stop being witty now, I think the fields are dry enough to plant more and rock pick.

BTW, I think there is a fish called a "Rockfish" But I'll stop being funny now so I don't give

you bluegills. I am just reacting to you getting shnarky with me.

Don't go away and pout like a trout, just take a hike like a pike.

Dammit, Dan, this is all YOUR fault. LOL

hook, line & sinker. just might have to rip the hook out of the gut!

It was a fishing joke.

Your IQ slur was not in keeping with the run of the thread, non-personal fishing jokes.

But you two had to stoop to personal attacks.

NOW you see what is ruining threads around here?

T is right - something stinks, and it's certain top Dems' $$$$$ relationship with China.

say, Obama got Chinese donations, too.

Corrupt, lying manipulators.

Clinton was not a socialist though, give him credit.

Article Here

While this proposal is controversial, it is not being presented to Congress, where it could meet with stern opposition. Instead, the State Department has been informed to assisted the Defense Department with the transfer of materials.

A little skeptical here as frankly $50 billion is less than a drop in the bucket of Chinese Treasury holdings which are easily well over $1 trillion. The economic impact of this transaction would be negligible to zero. On the other hand, if this ends up being true, it is quite frightening, as it merely demonstrates, aside from all the scary geo-political considerations, just how bad of a dealmaker our President is.

Look what China just bought from Obama, B-2 Spirit

'cause there must be a LOT of em, because Obama got elected.... @@

@danamal said:

I like to fish for catfish, so stink bait is my choice...and there is plenty of stink in Washington.

@danamal said:

I prefer the Gold ones. I have caught plenty of trout with them.