<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Mike Clay's Post-Draft Posiitional/Unit/Overall Grades]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	More known as a Fantasy Analyst who really works the WR and CB positions.
</p>

<p>
	<img alt="DcYNku3XUAArcOK.jpg" height="735" src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DcYNku3XUAArcOK.jpg" width="699" /></p>

<div class="tbb-social-embed" data-provider="x"><div class="tbb-tweet"><a class="tbb-tweet__author" href="https://x.com/MikeClayNFL" target="_blank" rel="nofollow ugc noopener"><img class="tbb-tweet__avatar not-responsive" src="https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/2061276886341173251/PD_zTQTw_bigger.jpg" alt="" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer"><span class="tbb-tweet__names"><span class="tbb-tweet__name">Mike Clay<i class="fa fa-circle-check tbb-tweet__check"></i></span><span class="tbb-tweet__handle">@MikeClayNFL</span></span><i class="fa-brands fa-x-twitter tbb-tweet__logo"></i></a><div class="tbb-tweet__text">And for the grand finale -- Updated Post-NFL Draft Overall Unit Grades <a href="https://x.com/hashtag/ClayProjections" target="_blank" rel="nofollow ugc noopener">#ClayProjections</a></div><div class="tbb-tweet__photos tbb-tweet__photos--1"><a href="https://x.com/MikeClayNFL/status/992496159267721217" target="_blank" rel="nofollow ugc noopener"><img class="not-responsive" src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DcYNku3XUAArcOK.jpg?name=medium" alt="" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" style="aspect-ratio:699/735"></a></div><div class="tbb-tweet__meta"><a href="https://x.com/MikeClayNFL/status/992496159267721217" target="_blank" rel="nofollow ugc noopener">May 4, 2018</a><span><i class="fa fa-heart"></i> 70</span><span><i class="fa fa-comment"></i> 22</span><a class="tbb-tweet__open" href="https://x.com/MikeClayNFL/status/992496159267721217" target="_blank" rel="nofollow ugc noopener">View on X</a></div></div></div>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/50049/mike-clay-s-post-draft-posiitional-unit-overall-grades</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 09:58:05 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/50049.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 16:14:08 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mike Clay's Post-Draft Posiitional/Unit/Overall Grades on Sat, 19 May 2018 23:19:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/canton-mike" aria-label="Profile: canton-mike">@<bdi>canton-mike</bdi></a> <a href="/post/792858">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Due to off season acquisitions via free agency, trades, draft, &amp; waivers, we have far greater ability to play players according to THEIR strengths. This year is gonna be fun!!
		</p>

		<p>
			Mike
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	And I have high hopes for Wilson @ CB. If he's 100% then lookout!
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/792871</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/792871</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[TexasAg1969]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2018 23:19:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mike Clay's Post-Draft Posiitional/Unit/Overall Grades on Sat, 19 May 2018 19:04:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/flugel" aria-label="Profile: flugel">@<bdi>flugel</bdi></a> <a href="/post/792854">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			When did he play in an NFL secondary? 
		</p>

		<p>
			Do you really think Gregg Williams repeatedly lining Peppers up in another area code reflected disappointment in Peppers' ability or perhaps more so in the foot speed of Corners Jamar Taylor and Jason McCourty (whom we got after TN replaced him w/1st round speed just 1 year before we did the same thing)??? Didn't we also just trade Taylor for a 6th round pick in 2020?
		</p>

		<p>
			Aside from drafting a corner that runs in the 4.3s at #4 overall, we've also traded for/signed FA Corners up the wazoo this off season.  Many started or got a lot of reps on NFL teams that actually WON football games last year. One of those corners (Randall) is projected to return to his college comfort zone of FS.
		</p>

		<p>
			Most of Peppers' experience at Missedagain was up in the box playing like an extra LBer where he performed at an All Conference/All American level.  Returning him to this comfort zone where he plays faster and more instinctual doesn't have to be a negative. I thought he had his best game against Pittsburgh when he was used more like he was used in college from where he lined up to what Gregg Williams asked of him.  It's okay to take a talented college football player and play him at a different NFL position/role where his skill set offers him the best outcomes.  Cleveland did that with Ozzie Newsome when they drafted an All American WR from Alabama and transformed him into an NFL TE with a Hall of Fame career. More recently, we did it with Schobert going from OLB to MLB.  It sounds like our DC will be returning Randall and Peppers back to roles that got them regarded well enough to be drafted in round 1.  In order to do that, Williams has to be far more comfortable with the Corners he's putting on the perimeter.   Let's see what happens...
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Due to off season acquisitions via free agency, trades, draft, &amp; waivers, we have far greater ability to play players according to THEIR strengths. This year is gonna be fun!!
</p>

<p>
	Mike
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/792858</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/792858</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Canton Mike]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2018 19:04:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mike Clay's Post-Draft Posiitional/Unit/Overall Grades on Sat, 19 May 2018 18:44:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tacosman" aria-label="Profile: tacosman">@<bdi>tacosman</bdi></a> <a href="/post/792577">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			1) sure a lot of teams had peppers as a second round pick.....none of those same teams would take himin the second round now after seeing what he looks like in an nfl secondary
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	When did he play in an NFL secondary? 
</p>

<p>
	Do you really think Gregg Williams repeatedly lining Peppers up in another area code reflected disappointment in Peppers' ability or perhaps more so in the foot speed of Corners Jamar Taylor and Jason McCourty (whom we got after TN replaced him w/1st round speed just 1 year before we did the same thing)??? Didn't we also just trade Taylor for a 6th round pick in 2020?
</p>

<p>
	Aside from drafting a corner that runs in the 4.3s at #4 overall, we've also traded for/signed FA Corners up the wazoo this off season.  Many started or got a lot of reps on NFL teams that actually WON football games last year. One of those corners (Randall) is projected to return to his college comfort zone of FS.
</p>

<p>
	Most of Peppers' experience at Missedagain was up in the box playing like an extra LBer where he performed at an All Conference/All American level.  Returning him to this comfort zone where he plays faster and more instinctual doesn't have to be a negative. I thought he had his best game against Pittsburgh when he was used more like he was used in college from where he lined up to what Gregg Williams asked of him.  It's okay to take a talented college football player and play him at a different NFL position/role where his skill set offers him the best outcomes.  Cleveland did that with Ozzie Newsome when they drafted an All American WR from Alabama and transformed him into an NFL TE with a Hall of Fame career. More recently, we did it with Schobert going from OLB to MLB.  It sounds like our DC will be returning Randall and Peppers back to roles that got them regarded well enough to be drafted in round 1.  In order to do that, Williams has to be far more comfortable with the Corners he's putting on the perimeter.   Let's see what happens...
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/792854</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/792854</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Flugel]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2018 18:44:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mike Clay's Post-Draft Posiitional/Unit/Overall Grades on Thu, 17 May 2018 20:46:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Given the shifting and disguising that go on within both sides of the ball plus the switching that can happen on defense, I tend to think of 2 safeties rather than S or F
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/792675</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/792675</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Unsympathetic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 20:46:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mike Clay's Post-Draft Posiitional/Unit/Overall Grades on Thu, 17 May 2018 14:17:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tacosman" aria-label="Profile: tacosman">@<bdi>tacosman</bdi></a> <a href="/post/792577">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			3) peppers being demoted to SS(SS is a far less valuable position in he nfl than FS today....just look at the market) speaks to his lesser coverage skills, but strong safeties in the nfl still are expected to cover people in space.....something peppers cant do on an nfl level.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	No one can cover receivers in space from centerfield. Bringing in Randall to his natural position and moving Peppers to his while vastly improving the CBs so we can eliminate playing Randall in centerfield, will make all the difference in the world. Those moves will give our edge guys the time they need to be true QB killers. This team is going to be very different from last year's team. Very different! Speed kills and we have added a ton both sides of the ball.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/792611</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/792611</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[TexasAg1969]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 14:17:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mike Clay's Post-Draft Posiitional/Unit/Overall Grades on Thu, 17 May 2018 12:20:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/gumby73" aria-label="Profile: gumby73">@<bdi>gumby73</bdi></a> <a href="/post/792572">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Top NFL team talent evaluators would say differently. Even if a second round pick. None of them positioned Peppers as parking lot attendant either. G.Williams admits Peppers was used as a bandaid on a poor coverage,poor tackling secondary. Williams not getting home with blitz, did not help matters..Peppers can cover better than some of his tackling angles.What we can't do is play 10 on 11 personal with a 10 or 11 yard wide open TE/WR/RB standing wide open in middle of field. Williams blamed himself for now on use of Pep.Stay tuned..(or there are 31 other teams looking for your opinion<img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f62e.png?v=aee8435e68b" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--open_mouth" title=":open_mouth:" alt="😮" />)       
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	1) sure a lot of teams had peppers as a second round pick.....none of those same teams would take himin the second round now after seeing what he looks like in an nfl secondary
</p>

<p>
	2) peppers is/was *in* that poor tackling secondary, and he was one of the reasons it was so poor
</p>

<p>
	3) peppers being demoted to SS(SS is a far less valuable position in he nfl than FS today....just look at the market) speaks to his lesser coverage skills, but strong safeties in the nfl still are expected to cover people in space.....something peppers cant do on an nfl level.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/792577</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/792577</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tacosman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 12:20:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mike Clay's Post-Draft Posiitional/Unit/Overall Grades on Thu, 17 May 2018 10:44:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tacosman" aria-label="Profile: tacosman">@<bdi>tacosman</bdi></a> <a href="/post/792568">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			peppers cant be expected to cover anyone period....
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Top NFL team talent evaluators would say differently. Even if a second round pick. None of them positioned Peppers as parking lot attendant either. G.Williams admits Peppers was used as a bandaid on a poor coverage,poor tackling secondary. Williams not getting home with blitz, did not help matters..Peppers can cover better than some of his tackling angles.What we can't do is play 10 on 11 personal with a 10 or 11 yard wide open TE/WR/RB standing wide open in middle of field. Williams blamed himself for now on use of Pep.Stay tuned..(or there are 31 other teams looking for your opinion<img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f62e.png?v=aee8435e68b" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--open_mouth" title=":open_mouth:" alt="😮" />)       
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/792572</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/792572</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gumby73]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 10:44:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mike Clay's Post-Draft Posiitional/Unit/Overall Grades on Thu, 17 May 2018 03:30:40 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/gumby73" aria-label="Profile: gumby73">@<bdi>gumby73</bdi></a> <a href="/post/791485">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			 Solutions?..TE's cannot be left uncovered on Peppers playing centerfield.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	peppers cant be expected to cover anyone period....
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/792568</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/792568</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tacosman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 03:30:40 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mike Clay's Post-Draft Posiitional/Unit/Overall Grades on Tue, 08 May 2018 14:14:22 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tour2ma" aria-label="Profile: tour2ma">@<bdi>tour2ma</bdi></a> <a href="/post/791385">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			More known as a Fantasy Analyst who really works the WR and CB positions.
		</p>

		<p>
			<img alt="DcYNku3XUAArcOK.jpg" height="735" src="https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DcYNku3XUAArcOK.jpg" width="699" /></p>

		<p>
			<a href="https://twitter.com/MikeClayNFL/status/992496159267721217" rel="external nofollow" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/MikeClayNFL/status/992496159267721217</a>
		</p>

		
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	<span style="color:#d35400"><strong>The spots where we rated low, we have some up-and-coming young players who I think will improve and make us much better:</strong></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="color:#d35400"><strong>QB Mayfield</strong></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="color:#d35400"><strong>DT  Brantley, Ogun, Coley</strong></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="color:#d35400"><strong>S Randall, Peppers</strong></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="color:#d35400"><strong>I think acquiring Randall to play free safety is a very underrated move around the league and amongst Browns fans. He is a first round talent that is meant to be playing the position. Peppers is now at his proper position with a year experience under his belt. Another first round talent. </strong></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="color:#d35400"><strong>Randall is 25, Peppers is 22.</strong></span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="color:#d35400"><strong>Zombo</strong></span>
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/791510</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/791510</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zombo]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 14:14:22 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mike Clay's Post-Draft Posiitional/Unit/Overall Grades on Tue, 08 May 2018 11:34:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	 Solutions?..TE's cannot be left uncovered on Peppers playing centerfield.Did not realize Denver/Miami/Oak./NYG could not either. Mike Zimmer's Vikings were killer at this. Covering RB's out of the backfield would also help.Vikings D again took this away.  <a href="https://www.rotowire.com/football/team-vs-position.php?position=te&amp;site=standard" rel="external nofollow">https://www.rotowire.com/football/team-vs-position.php?position=te&amp;site=standard</a>  
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/791485</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/791485</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gumby73]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 11:34:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mike Clay's Post-Draft Posiitional/Unit/Overall Grades on Tue, 08 May 2018 03:27:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/orion" aria-label="Profile: orion">@<bdi>orion</bdi></a> <a href="/post/791468">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			It also shows that our EDGE could' used Chubb.  (But then our CB's woulda' probably been low
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Been doing a little catch up on this guy. I'm very impressed with his quickness to the QB. I think he's going to add a lot to the LDE spot. Take a look at how fast he gets after it.
</p>

<p></p><div class="embed-wrapper"><div class="embed-container"><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/jjj-EqHBFVg" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div></div><p></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/791475</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/791475</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[TexasAg1969]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 03:27:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mike Clay's Post-Draft Posiitional/Unit/Overall Grades on Tue, 08 May 2018 02:45:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	So this chart says that we have very good WR's &amp; CB's...but our CB's cannot catch the ball.
</p>

<p>
	It also shows that our EDGE could' used Chubb.  (But then our CB's woulda' probably been low)
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/791468</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/791468</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Orion]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 02:45:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mike Clay's Post-Draft Posiitional/Unit/Overall Grades on Tue, 08 May 2018 00:25:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Gip likes his info spoonfed... don't forget to burp him.
</p>

<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/mjp28" aria-label="Profile: mjp28">@<bdi>mjp28</bdi></a> <a href="/post/791391">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			So who got the best bang for their buck? Looks like in general the perennial winners are near the top and the perennial  cellar dwellers are.....well not.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Appears the positional grades are on a 0.0 to 4.0 scale in one-tenth increments. Sometimes he awards teams the extremes; sometimes he doesn't. Scanned a few columns and it does not appear that he reuses a value within a given position, so he has 41 grades to assign 32 teams. Likely he's ordering the talent as he sees it and determines whether any team's talent approaches perfection or the utter lack of it.
</p>



<p>
	What's not so clear is how he arrives at his grades for the Off and Def. Not really seeing a sum of the parts thing going on. He does reuse grades although not the ranking. The "total" is the sum of the "O"+"D". But the positional grades seem to be the meat here...
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/791450</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/791450</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tour2ma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 00:25:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mike Clay's Post-Draft Posiitional/Unit/Overall Grades on Mon, 07 May 2018 19:16:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/the-gipper" aria-label="Profile: the-gipper">@<bdi>the-gipper</bdi></a> <a href="/post/791390">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Are these numbers supposed to mean something to us?
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	I'm thinking it should be self explanatory Gipper. Like a traffic light. <span style="color:#c0392b"><strong>RED= </strong></span><span style="color:#000000">stop, below average. </span><span style="color:#009933"><strong>GREEN= </strong></span><span style="color:#000000">go, above average. <strong>White= </strong>average. Browns weak at QB, interior DL, S. Good at WR, OL, CB. If Gordon stays clean, remains to be seen about the corners. </span>
</p>

<p>
	<span style="color:#000000">Ha, if those rankings mean anything 8-8 here we come.  <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f601.png?v=aee8435e68b" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--grin" title=":grin:" alt="😁" /> </span>
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/791416</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/791416</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hoorta]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 19:16:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mike Clay's Post-Draft Posiitional/Unit/Overall Grades on Mon, 07 May 2018 19:16:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	TE, LB and CB seem high
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/791415</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/791415</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MLD Woody]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 19:16:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mike Clay's Post-Draft Posiitional/Unit/Overall Grades on Mon, 07 May 2018 17:48:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Well if that doesn't translate to at least near final finish order for the season, then we'll know it's the coaching.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/791407</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/791407</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[TexasAg1969]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 17:48:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mike Clay's Post-Draft Posiitional/Unit/Overall Grades on Mon, 07 May 2018 16:44:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	So who got the best bang for their buck? Looks like in general the perennial winners are near the top and the perennial  cellar dwellers are.....well not.
</p>

<p>
	BROWNS, eh not too bad.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/791391</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/791391</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mjp28]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 16:44:15 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mike Clay's Post-Draft Posiitional/Unit/Overall Grades on Mon, 07 May 2018 16:20:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Are these numbers supposed to mean something to us?
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/791390</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/791390</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 16:20:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Mike Clay's Post-Draft Posiitional/Unit/Overall Grades on Mon, 07 May 2018 16:19:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Poster over at reddit dug up last year's grades for contrast.
</p>

<div>
	<div>
		<p>
			2017 / 2018
		</p>

		<p>
			QB - 0.5 / 1.4 <em>(+0.9)</em><br />
			RB - 1.3 / 2.7 <em>(+1.4)</em><br />
			WR - 0.5 / 3.4 <em>(+2.9)</em><br />
			TE - 0.9 / 2.5 <em>(+1.4)</em><br />
			OL - 3.4 / 2.8 <em>(-0.6)</em>
		</p>

		<p>
			INT - 0.4 / 0.3 <em>(-0.1)</em><br />
			EDGE - 0.5 / 2.3 <em>(+1.8)</em><br />
			LB - 2.6 / 2.2 <em>(-0.4)</em><br />
			CB - 1.0 / 3.5 <em>(+2.5)</em><br />
			S - 0.1 / 0.3 <em>(+0.2)</em>
		</p>

		<p>
			OFF - 0.6 / 1.2 <em>(+0.6)</em><br />
			DEF - 0.4 / 0.9 <em>(+0.5)</em><br />
			Total - 1.1 / 2.1 <em>(+1.0)</em>
		</p>
	</div>
</div>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/791389</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/791389</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tour2ma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2018 16:19:15 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>