<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Going for 2]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	<a href="http://www.espn.com/blog/cleveland/post/_/id/5581/hue-jacksons-new-mantra-go-for-two" rel="external nofollow">http://www.espn.com/blog/cleveland/post/_/id/5581/hue-jacksons-new-mantra-go-for-two</a>
</p>

<p>
	I know this was noticed by many here, but this is the first significant pub l’ve seen On the Browns’ proclivity for 2 point conversion attempts. Apparently it’s a thing with this team. 
</p>

<p>
	I kinda dig it. It’s the sorta balls out stuff balls were made for, and it’s like touchdown practice. 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/51165/going-for-2</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 06:48:46 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/51165.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 06:10:38 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Going for 2 on Sun, 07 Oct 2018 14:08:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/orion" aria-label="Profile: orion">@<bdi>orion</bdi></a> <a href="/post/818420">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			You don't agree with a single thing I say....which is just the way I like it.  
		</p>

		<p>
			If you score a TD to go up 7, if you go for two and make it, you have a 2 score lead at 9 points.
		</p>

		<p>
			If you fail on the 2pnt conversion then you're still up 7.  The opponent will need to score a TD...and will kick the extra point to tie you.  He MOST PROBABLY will not go for 2 and potentially lose.
		</p>

		<p>
			If you score a TD to go up 7 and kick the extra point....then you're opponent will go for 2 to tie you. 
		</p>

		<p>
			--  So!  Whether you're up 7 or 8, the opponent will try to TIE your score.  Therefore, it's a no-brainer.  If you're up 7 in the 4th quarter...go for 2.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Absolutely no coach is going to have that mindset, I know I wouldn't.
</p>

<p>
	I knew what your reasoning was. But the likelihood of achieving the 2 pt conversion is less than 50%, which works both ways, for your team and the opponent
</p>

<p>
	Again, fan view vs coach view
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/818548</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/818548</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gunz41]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2018 14:08:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Going for 2 on Sun, 07 Oct 2018 01:49:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/gunz41" aria-label="Profile: gunz41">@<bdi>gunz41</bdi></a> <a href="/post/818406">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			You mean get the 2 pt conversation to go up 9?
		</p>

		<p>
			That is the worst time to go for 2. It looks good when you get it to have a 2 score lead, but when you dont get it you leave yourself with a 7 pt lead instead of 8
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	You don't agree with a single thing I say....which is just the way I like it.  
</p>

<p>
	If you score a TD to go up 7, if you go for two and make it, you have a 2 score lead at 9 points.
</p>

<p>
	If you fail on the 2pnt conversion then you're still up 7.  The opponent will need to score a TD...and will kick the extra point to tie you.  He MOST PROBABLY will not go for 2 and potentially lose.
</p>

<p>
	If you score a TD to go up 7 and kick the extra point....then you're opponent will go for 2 to tie you. 
</p>

<p>
	--  So!  Whether you're up 7 or 8, the opponent will try to TIE your score.  Therefore, it's a no-brainer.  If you're up 7 in the 4th quarter...go for 2.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/818420</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/818420</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Orion]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2018 01:49:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Going for 2 on Sat, 06 Oct 2018 23:31:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/orion" aria-label="Profile: orion">@<bdi>orion</bdi></a> <a href="/post/818224">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			I don't think you should start a game out going for 2pt conversions.
		</p>

		<p>
			I think you let them come to you.  When, in the course of the game, the #'s make sense...then you try it.  Like going up by 9.
		</p>

		<p>
			edit -  or if you have a God-Awful kicker.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	You mean get the 2 pt conversation to go up 9?
</p>

<p>
	That is the worst time to go for 2. It looks good when you get it to have a 2 score lead, but when you dont get it you leave yourself with a 7 pt lead instead of 8
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/818406</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/818406</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gunz41]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2018 23:31:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Going for 2 on Sat, 06 Oct 2018 17:42:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	How many positions in this thread would reflexively change if it was common knowledge that "going for 2" is purely an analytics conclusion?
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/818350</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/818350</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Unsympathetic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2018 17:42:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Going for 2 on Sat, 06 Oct 2018 15:32:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/texasag1969" aria-label="Profile: texasag1969">@<bdi>texasag1969</bdi></a> <a href="/post/818297">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Obviously the Big Island cal. I'm pretty sure that is Mauna Loa and Mauna Kea in the foreplayground.<span>?</span>
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	<img alt="250px-TwinPeaks_openingshotcredits.jpg" height="188" src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/e/ea/TwinPeaks_openingshotcredits.jpg/250px-TwinPeaks_openingshotcredits.jpg" width="250" /></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/818330</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/818330</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2018 15:32:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Going for 2 on Sat, 06 Oct 2018 14:25:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tour2ma" aria-label="Profile: tour2ma">@<bdi>tour2ma</bdi></a> <a href="/post/818287">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			I still think the best argument against going 2-crazy is that you show your best short yardage plays.
		</p>

		
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	i hated it before, but this a good point that makes the idea even worse
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/818315</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/818315</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clevfan4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2018 14:25:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Going for 2 on Sat, 06 Oct 2018 12:59:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Obviously the Big Island cal. I'm pretty sure that is Mauna Loa and Mauna Kea in the foreplayground.<span>?</span>
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/818297</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/818297</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[TexasAg1969]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2018 12:59:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Going for 2 on Sat, 06 Oct 2018 12:43:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I still think the best argument against going 2-crazy is that you show your best short yardage plays.
</p>

<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/ibleedbrown" aria-label="Profile: ibleedbrown">@<bdi>ibleedbrown</bdi></a> <a href="/post/818126">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			The article mentions it may be a Haley thing.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Makes a lot of sense given the Pittsburgh factor, but the call is still under the HC's control.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/818287</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/818287</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tour2ma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2018 12:43:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Going for 2 on Sat, 06 Oct 2018 08:19:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Sure, play aggressive and go for two early. Then when the game is on the line and you need a foot to win....meow!  Thanks coach!
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/818262</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/818262</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[flyingfooldoug]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2018 08:19:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Going for 2 on Sat, 06 Oct 2018 02:34:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/the-gipper" aria-label="Profile: the-gipper">@<bdi>the-gipper</bdi></a> <a href="/post/818133">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			<strong>I always like to go for 2 when it comes to erect nipples.</strong>
		</p>

		<p>
			<a href="https://i.pinimg.com/originals/d0/fd/3a/d0fd3a95e0b77a12e420206421130761.jpg" title="Enlarge image" rel="external nofollow"><img alt="d0fd3a95e0b77a12e420206421130761.jpg" height="750" src="https://i.pinimg.com/originals/d0/fd/3a/d0fd3a95e0b77a12e420206421130761.jpg" width="531" /></a>
		</p>

		<p>
			<a href="https://i.pinimg.com/originals/d0/fd/3a/d0fd3a95e0b77a12e420206421130761.jpg" title="Enlarge image" rel="external nofollow">Hawaii? Island of Kaui ?Napali Coastline?</a>
		</p>
	
</blockquote>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/818238</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/818238</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2018 02:34:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Going for 2 on Sat, 06 Oct 2018 01:46:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I don't think you should start a game out going for 2pt conversions.
</p>

<p>
	I think you let them come to you.  When, in the course of the game, the #'s make sense...then you try it.  Like going up by 9.
</p>

<p>
	edit -  or if you have a God-Awful kicker.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/818224</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/818224</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Orion]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2018 01:46:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Going for 2 on Fri, 05 Oct 2018 19:45:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/ibleedbrown" aria-label="Profile: ibleedbrown">@<bdi>ibleedbrown</bdi></a> <a href="/post/818126">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			The article mentions it may be a Haley thing. Maybe having 2 erect nipples all the time makes a guy prone to going for 2? I dunno. 2 points. 2 nipples. 
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	I will say I did really like the play design of all the 2pt conversions we ran. We were a Callaway drop away from getting all three actually. Getting Duke in on the runs and spreading them out really gives a lot of options.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/818135</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/818135</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jrb12711]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 19:45:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Going for 2 on Fri, 05 Oct 2018 19:37:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/ibleedbrown" aria-label="Profile: ibleedbrown">@<bdi>ibleedbrown</bdi></a> <a href="/post/818126">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			The article mentions it may be a Haley thing. Maybe having 2 erect nipples all the time makes a guy prone to going for 2? I dunno. 2 points. 2 nipples. 
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	<strong>I always like to go for 2 when it comes to erect nipples.</strong>
</p>

<p>
	<img alt="d0fd3a95e0b77a12e420206421130761.jpg" height="750" src="https://i.pinimg.com/originals/d0/fd/3a/d0fd3a95e0b77a12e420206421130761.jpg" width="531" /></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/818133</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/818133</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[The Gipper]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 19:37:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Going for 2 on Fri, 05 Oct 2018 18:46:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/comeonman" aria-label="Profile: comeonman">@<bdi>comeonman</bdi></a> <a href="/post/818124">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			It’s what the Steelers started doing last year. They veered away from it for some reason. 
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	The article mentions it may be a Haley thing. Maybe having 2 erect nipples all the time makes a guy prone to going for 2? I dunno. 2 points. 2 nipples. 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/818126</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/818126</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Ibleedbrown]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 18:46:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Going for 2 on Fri, 05 Oct 2018 18:38:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	It’s what the Steelers started doing last year. They veered away from it for some reason. 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/818124</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/818124</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Comeonman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 18:38:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Going for 2 on Fri, 05 Oct 2018 18:32:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Very good article about it too for my stats peeps:
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/nfl-coaches-are-going-for-two-more-than-ever-it-took-them-long-enough/" rel="external nofollow">https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/nfl-coaches-are-going-for-two-more-than-ever-it-took-them-long-enough/</a>
</p>

<p>
	I'm not fundamentally opposed to it. Pretty simple put, you just have to convert 50% of the time for it to be worth it. Simple math says the odds are in your favor.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/818122</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/818122</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jrb12711]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2018 18:32:01 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>