@cccjwh said:

So much effort to avoid taking any personal responsibility.

- Blame someone else

- Says other people did the same thing

- Misdirection with righty's second favorite boogieman. OBAMA!!!

Your trolling game needs work.

@canton-dawg said:

We could talk about Obama’s greatest economic contribution to America, during his 8 year tenure.

But there’s only so much we can discuss regarding “Cash for Clunkers”. 

So much effort to avoid taking any personal responsibility.

- Blame someone else

- Says other people did the same thing

- Misdirection with righty's second favorite boogieman. OBAMA!!!

@canton-dawg said:

We could talk about Obama’s greatest economic contribution to America, during his 8 year tenure.

But there’s only so much we can discuss regarding “Cash for Clunkers”. 

I did not care much for Obama as a president at all. He made one correct decision early on, to keep in place the drastic measures that had to be taken under Bush to recover from what was about to turn from a great recession into a Second Great Depression. Other than that he was pretty much a Chicago Alderman, particularly when it came to foreign affairs.

@texasag1969 said:

After the worst Dec. since the Great Depression. So much winning! @ real con man.

We could talk about Obama’s greatest economic contribution to America, during his 8 year tenure.

But there’s only so much we can discuss regarding “Cash for Clunkers”. 

@texasag1969 said:

After the worst Dec. since the Great Depression. So much winning! @ real con man.

Lols, perspective is a kunt isnt it?

@diehardbrownsfan said:

After the worst Dec. since the Great Depression. So much winning! @ real con man.

@canton-dawg said:

And you shit for brains start a thread “if there’s any truth to this” for a news item that was already being discussed in another thread.

Follow you own advice dumbass.

Ooo, i made a thread about a topic that was being discussed in another thread tgst was started about a different topic, and one that i hadnt read. U got me canton. 

Christ you'll grab at anything huh?

@clevfan4life said:

but you should take responsibility for dumbassery. Because you're a dumbass that didn't take less than 20 seconds to do a google run. #uradumbass

And you shit for brains start a thread “if there’s any truth to this” for a news item that was already being discussed in another thread.

Follow you own advice dumbass.

@canton-dawg said:

Sorry, I don't take the blame for shoddy journalism.

but you should take responsibility for dumbassery. Because you're a dumbass that didn't take less than 20 seconds to do a google run. #uradumbass

@canton-dawg said:

Like your BuzzFeed?

have I ever linked a buzzfeed article that wasn't replicated at every other major news outlet including FOX?

@canton-dawg said:

Sorry, I don't take the blame for shoddy journalism.

Yes shoddy journalism made you post an article and not read it. It also made you choose the sites you read. None of it is your fault of course. <-- this is sarcasm baby cow

@cccjwh said:

You didn't post a link to first article and apparently didn't read what you posted here. Thanks for taking responsibility posting poor/wrong information, oh wait you didn't take any responsibility for it. nm

Sorry, I don't take the blame for shoddy journalism.

"blabber blabber bs stupid ignorant and antagonistic empty threatening garbage.....whine/bitch/complain..."

am I correct? just a guess....

@canton-dawg said:

From what I read yesterday, there were some miscommunications between US & China regarding volumes, and some backtracking.

It was reported as "per day" according to the first website I read about it, and its still there (obviously wrong). . .

https://www.morningstar.com/news/dow-jones/TDJNDN_2019013113323/china-says-it-will-buy-5-million-tons-of-us-soybeans-a-day-trump-says-will-make-our-farmers-very-happy-4th-update.html

You didn't post a link to first article and apparently didn't read what you posted here. Thanks for taking responsibility posting poor/wrong information, oh wait you didn't take any responsibility for it. nm

@clevfan4life said:

Canton must think the story can't be mainstream until it's made the main page at Eonline or thumbsNass.com

Like your BuzzFeed?

@cccjwh said:

What is it with righty and not reading their own links?

How much will China buy?  That is still open to debate.  "The Wall Street Journal" reports China said it would buy 5 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans a day based on comments made by Chinese leaders, but a U.S. administration official told Reuters the exact amount was misinterpreted, and it is not a per day amount, but rather one purchase of 5 million metric tons. - From your high speed article.

MSM really missed out on reporting this. Oh wait this article got the information from the Wall Street Journal and Reuters. How can you not be embarrassed after posting this?

From what I read yesterday, there were some miscommunications between US & China regarding volumes, and some backtracking.

It was reported as "per day" according to the first website I read about it, and its still there (obviously wrong). . .

https://www.morningstar.com/news/dow-jones/TDJNDN_2019013113323/china-says-it-will-buy-5-million-tons-of-us-soybeans-a-day-trump-says-will-make-our-farmers-very-happy-4th-update.html

@cccjwh said:

 How can you not be embarrassed after posting this?

Because perennial ignorance is not the shameful thing it once was. Everyone screws up, posts something too quick or didnt read the whole thing.....but its relentless here. Its almost bordering on willful if i actually thought some of these guys were smart enough to be willfully ignirant.

@canton-dawg said:

Funny how the MSM overlooked this bit of news. . .

https://www.agweb.com/article/breaking-news-china-to-increase-soybean-purchases/

What is it with righty and not reading their own links?

How much will China buy?  That is still open to debate.  "The Wall Street Journal" reports China said it would buy 5 million metric tons of U.S. soybeans a day based on comments made by Chinese leaders, but a U.S. administration official told Reuters the exact amount was misinterpreted, and it is not a per day amount, but rather one purchase of 5 million metric tons. - From your high speed article.

MSM really missed out on reporting this. Oh wait this article got the information from the Wall Street Journal and Reuters. How can you not be embarrassed after posting this?