@westside-steve said:

Better job than Walmart greeter I guess.

?

WSS

"How lovely to see you all today miss." ?

@texasag1969 said:

I'm not so sure about that. I may need to volunteer as a balance "holder".??

Better job than Walmart greeter I guess.

?

WSS

@westside-steve said:

Looks balanced to me

WSS

I'm not so sure about that. I may need to volunteer as a balance "holder".??

@texasag1969 said:

I'm very disappointed. I could have swore the  topic said "Slanted Cleavage". ??

Looks balanced to me

WSS

@westside-steve said:

Regardless of your love for Michael Bloomberg who didn't write the story this is a CNBC piece which only referenced the Bloomberg News. Bloomberg did not write the inflammatory headline did they? No.

WSS

my love? what?

if you're  going down the Typical Steve rabbit hole I'll just hop out now

@westside-steve said:

Regardless of your love for Michael Bloomberg who didn't write the story this is a CNBC piece which only referenced the Bloomberg News. Bloomberg did not write the inflammatory headline did they? No.

WSS

Bloomberg originally wrote the article, CNBC felt it was worth...umm repeating.

@canton-dawg said:

Michael Bloomberg is another democratic billionaire that despises Trump...that’s another angle.

Regardless of your love for Michael Bloomberg who didn't write the story this is a CNBC piece which only referenced the Bloomberg News. Bloomberg did not write the inflammatory headline did they? No.

WSS

@mld-woody said:

You aren't a respected, actual news organization. Bloomberg didn't write that article based off of the word from some bum on the street. They have financial reasons not to do so.

Michael Bloomberg is another democratic billionaire that despises Trump...that’s another angle.

@westside-steve said:

Based on absolutely nothing Woody. And that's the point. But it's cool isn't it? I never really said that you were going to post child porn did I? I never said who reported it did I? Could have been a bum off the street, who knows? I have some bum off the street reported that to me or one of the administrators sure we would probably consider it for a second even if we thought it was bullshit. Right?

WSS

You aren't a respected, actual news organization. Bloomberg didn't write that article based off of the word from some bum on the street. They have financial reasons not to do so.

@mld-woody said:

Based on what? Is there a reputable news source reporting it? 

If they are, without any sources, and it is an actual hit piece, I'll sue them for $250 million

Based on absolutely nothing Woody. And that's the point. But it's cool isn't it? I never really said that you were going to post child porn did I? I never said who reported it did I? Could have been a bum off the street, who knows? I have some bum off the street reported that to me or one of the administrators sure we would probably consider it for a second even if we thought it was bullshit. Right?

WSS

@westside-steve said:

Browns board is reportedly considering suspending Woody's membership do to fear that he might post child pronography.

Woody Jr says that report is "complete nonsense."

Sound like an honest news story to you?

WSS

Based on what? Is there a reputable news source reporting it? 

If they are, without any sources, and it is an actual hit piece, I'll sue them for $250 million

Woody Jr says that report is "complete nonsense."

Sound like an honest news story to you?

WSS

@westside-steve said:

I don't suppose you would.

WSS

It also isn't a hit piece...

And if you're actually calling this a hit piece, I'd want to know what you'd call the articles that are posted on here regularly...

https://www.lifenews.com/2019/02/19/new-york-times-whines-republicans-are-demonizing-democrats-as-socialists-and-baby-killers/

This so called journalist for the NYT should be getting paid not only by the NY Times but should be on the payroll of the Democrat National Committee as well for whom she is carrying water for. 

@mld-woody said:

I just don't see it as a "hit piece" 

I don't suppose you would.

WSS

@westside-steve said:

Absolutely no doubt Woodrow. But that's what you expect from websites like the blaze or ammoland. Animal Land, would you assume that CNBC didn't hold itself to any higher standard than that? Seriously?

WSS

I just don't see it as a "hit piece" 

@mld-woody said:

Compared to the articles that get posted on here regularly, that seems pretty neutral

Absolutely no doubt Woodrow. But that's what you expect from websites like the blaze or ammoland. Animal Land, would you assume that CNBC didn't hold itself to any higher standard than that? Seriously?

WSS