<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Liberal sanctuary "nazis" - THEY are allowed "sanctuary cities", only when THEY want to.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	The rest of America isn't allowed to disobey their stupid anti-gun laws.
</p>

<p>
	Sheriffs all over the state have openly refused to enforce their unConstitutional laws.
</p>

<p>
	But their defiance of the law over illegals, well, they want the vote for the dem socialists.
</p>

<p>
	So , THAT is ok. But they dream of total control over our entire country, and that can't happen
</p>

<p>
	until they get major defeats of our Constitution.
</p>

<p>
	bizarre. It's what democratic fascism/socialism does.
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.ammoland.com/2019/03/washington-state-governor-presidential-candidate-threatens-gun-dealers/?utm_source=Ammoland+Subscribers&amp;utm_campaign=982c951558-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&amp;utm_medium=email&amp;utm_term=0_6f6fac3eaa-982c951558-20770865#axzz5hrVrklTK" rel="external nofollow">https://www.ammoland.com/2019/03/washington-state-governor-presidential-candidate-threatens-gun-dealers/?utm_source=Ammoland+Subscribers&amp;amp;utm_campaign=982c951558-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&amp;amp;utm_medium=email&amp;amp;utm_term=0_6f6fac3eaa-982c951558-20770865#axzz5hrVrklTK</a>
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/52625/liberal-sanctuary-nazis-they-are-allowed-sanctuary-cities-only-when-they-want-to.</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 02:54:25 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/52625.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:40:44 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Liberal sanctuary "nazis" - THEY are allowed "sanctuary cities", only when THEY want to. on Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:24:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/mld-woody" aria-label="Profile: mld-woody">@<bdi>mld-woody</bdi></a> <a href="/post/855306">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			So a vote you disagree with is "voting wrong"?
		</p>

		

		<p>
			I'm still in favor of a merit based system where votes are weighted based on your performance on a test covering history, current politics, basic scientific literacy, etc . 
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	But ur talking to people that feel they should be allowed to conceal carry freely without 1/10000000000^11 of the training and qualifications even a reserve police officer has to go through.
</p>













<p>
	But.............. I reckon a bright young feller like u probably realized what he was dealing with here within a week or two of signing up.
</p>



<p>
	<span><img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/2615.png?v=00a0b17bbb1" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--coffee" title="☕" alt="☕" /></span><span><img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/2615.png?v=00a0b17bbb1" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--coffee" title="☕" alt="☕" /></span>
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/855354</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/855354</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clevfan4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:24:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Liberal sanctuary "nazis" - THEY are allowed "sanctuary cities", only when THEY want to. on Mon, 11 Mar 2019 20:31:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/oldbrownsfan" aria-label="Profile: oldbrownsfan">@<bdi>oldbrownsfan</bdi></a> <a href="/post/855272">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			I am well read on American history and our political system. It is even more awesome that ignorant younger people who seem to know so little about this country are still able to vote (and mostly voting wrong for liberal democrats):
		</p>

		<p></p><div class="embed-wrapper"><div class="embed-container"><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/I-t2TwLRdgk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div></div><p></p>

		<p>
			Note: This video was made in 2016 when Joe Biden (whom these college students didn't recognize) was actually the current vice president. 
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	So a vote you disagree with is "voting wrong"?
</p>



<p>
	I'm still in favor of a merit based system where votes are weighted based on your performance on a test covering history, current politics, basic scientific literacy, etc . 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/855306</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/855306</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MLD Woody]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 20:31:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Liberal sanctuary "nazis" - THEY are allowed "sanctuary cities", only when THEY want to. on Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:34:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Although I have to say, I am fucking dying at that little snowflake mistaking Ronald Reagan for bill Clinton. Its only mon but I can already tell that its all down hill from here. Dear God I would love that clip be shown at cpac.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/855296</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/855296</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clevfan4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:34:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Liberal sanctuary "nazis" - THEY are allowed "sanctuary cities", only when THEY want to. on Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:30:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/oldbrownsfan" aria-label="Profile: oldbrownsfan">@<bdi>oldbrownsfan</bdi></a> <a href="/post/855272">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			and our political system. 
		</p>

		
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Ur aactually not, like at all. U know what the 2 parties have parsed for u old and feeble folk who don't feel like thinking anymore
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/855293</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/855293</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clevfan4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 19:30:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Liberal sanctuary "nazis" - THEY are allowed "sanctuary cities", only when THEY want to. on Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:39:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/clevfan4life" aria-label="Profile: clevfan4life">@<bdi>clevfan4life</bdi></a> <a href="/post/855262">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			That's awesome u can vote too. That's so awesome. 
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	I am well read on American history and our political system. It is even more awesome that ignorant younger people who seem to know so little about this country are still able to vote (and mostly voting wrong for liberal democrats):
</p>

<p></p><div class="embed-wrapper"><div class="embed-container"><iframe src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/I-t2TwLRdgk" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></div></div><p></p>

<p>
	Note: This video was made in 2016 when Joe Biden (whom these college students didn't recognize) was actually the current vice president. 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/855272</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/855272</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OldBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 18:39:32 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Liberal sanctuary "nazis" - THEY are allowed "sanctuary cities", only when THEY want to. on Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:54:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/oldbrownsfan" aria-label="Profile: oldbrownsfan">@<bdi>oldbrownsfan</bdi></a> <a href="/post/855245">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			and at my age I usually have trouble remembering things that happened yesterday).
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	That's awesome u can vote too. That's so awesome. 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/855262</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/855262</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Clevfan4life]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:54:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Liberal sanctuary "nazis" - THEY are allowed "sanctuary cities", only when THEY want to. on Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:01:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/gorka" aria-label="Profile: gorka">@<bdi>gorka</bdi></a> <a href="/post/855231">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Just wondering how many actually remember the Woody Woodpecker cartoons. If you do you're pretty old. lol 
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	When I was 4 years old I got a big Woody Woodpecker stuffed animal for Christmas (1959) which was the coolest thing I could have gotten. Almost 60 years later I still remember it (and at my age I usually have trouble remembering things that happened yesterday).
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/855245</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/855245</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OldBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:01:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Liberal sanctuary "nazis" - THEY are allowed "sanctuary cities", only when THEY want to. on Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:48:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/calfoxwc" aria-label="Profile: calfoxwc">@<bdi>calfoxwc</bdi></a> <a href="/post/855216">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			well, that is a COWARDLY thing to say.
		</p>

		<p>
			too bad texsag "claims" he has me ignore - he won't see this:
		</p>

		<p>
			(he doesn't get definitions anyways)
		</p>

		<p>
			<a href="https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/44469/usage-of-cowardly-and-coward" rel="external nofollow">https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/44469/usage-of-cowardly-and-coward</a>
		</p>

		<p>
			"The difference is that <em>cowardly</em> is usually an adjective, while <em>coward</em> is almost always a noun. Hence:
		</p>

		<div>
			<div>
				<blockquote>
					<p>
						That woodpecker is a <em>coward</em>.<br />
						That <em>cowardly</em> woodpecker pecks and runs at the sound of hooves.
					</p>
				</blockquote>

				
				As to meaning differences (I've been dealing with usage), you would use <em>cowardly</em> if you weren't necessarily name-calling or venting; the term sounds more objective. You could quietly use it, without strong feelings. <em>Coward</em>, on the other hand, always connotes strong feelings. If you use <em>coward</em> as an adjective, I'm more likely to think you are name-calling or venting."<img alt="giphy.gif" height="375" src="https://media.giphy.com/media/cRHU6RK4PhS48/giphy.gif" width="500" /></div>
		</div>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Just wondering how many actually remember the Woody Woodpecker cartoons. If you do you're pretty old. lol 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/855231</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/855231</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gorka]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:48:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Liberal sanctuary "nazis" - THEY are allowed "sanctuary cities", only when THEY want to. on Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:03:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/gorka" aria-label="Profile: gorka">@<bdi>gorka</bdi></a> <a href="/post/855193">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			?
		</p>

		<p>
			Cals posts that cannot be argued or debunked?
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	That 36 number would be much, much higher
</p>



<p>
	Plus I have him on ignore. Too bad it can't ignore whole threads
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/855224</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/855224</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MLD Woody]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:03:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Liberal sanctuary "nazis" - THEY are allowed "sanctuary cities", only when THEY want to. on Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:37:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/texasag1969" aria-label="Profile: texasag1969">@<bdi>texasag1969</bdi></a> <a href="/post/855209">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Nope. The number originally sourcing out of St. Petersburg of the last 36.<span>?</span>
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	well, that is a COWARDLY thing to say.
</p>

<p>
	too bad texsag "claims" he has me ignore - he won't see this:
</p>

<p>
	(he doesn't get definitions anyways)
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/44469/usage-of-cowardly-and-coward" rel="external nofollow">https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/44469/usage-of-cowardly-and-coward</a>
</p>

<p>
	"The difference is that <em>cowardly</em> is usually an adjective, while <em>coward</em> is almost always a noun. Hence:
</p>

<div>
	<div>
		<blockquote>
			<p>
				That woodpecker is a <em>coward</em>.<br />
				That <em>cowardly</em> woodpecker pecks and runs at the sound of hooves.
			</p>
		</blockquote>

		
		As to meaning differences (I've been dealing with usage), you would use <em>cowardly</em> if you weren't necessarily name-calling or venting; the term sounds more objective. You could quietly use it, without strong feelings. <em>Coward</em>, on the other hand, always connotes strong feelings. If you use <em>coward</em> as an adjective, I'm more likely to think you are name-calling or venting."<img alt="giphy.gif" height="375" src="https://media.giphy.com/media/cRHU6RK4PhS48/giphy.gif" width="500" /></div>
</div>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/855216</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/855216</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:37:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Liberal sanctuary "nazis" - THEY are allowed "sanctuary cities", only when THEY want to. on Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:07:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/mld-woody" aria-label="Profile: mld-woody">@<bdi>mld-woody</bdi></a> <a href="/post/855183">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			I think that's 22 of 36 or so now
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	<img alt="giphy.gif?cid=3640f6095c866b846c4b435267" height="173" src="https://media2.giphy.com/media/4vm0DPQ1qWu5y/giphy.gif?cid=3640f6095c866b846c4b4352674bf198" width="230" /></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/855212</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/855212</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 14:07:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Liberal sanctuary "nazis" - THEY are allowed "sanctuary cities", only when THEY want to. on Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:51:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/gorka" aria-label="Profile: gorka">@<bdi>gorka</bdi></a> <a href="/post/855193">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			?
		</p>

		<p>
			Cals posts that cannot be argued or debunked?
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Nope. The number originally sourcing out of St. Petersburg of the last 36.<span>?</span>
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/855209</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/855209</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[TexasAg1969]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:51:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Liberal sanctuary "nazis" - THEY are allowed "sanctuary cities", only when THEY want to. on Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:19:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/mld-woody" aria-label="Profile: mld-woody">@<bdi>mld-woody</bdi></a> <a href="/post/855183">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			I think that's 22 of 36 or so now
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	?
</p>

<p>
	Cals posts that cannot be argued or debunked?
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/855193</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/855193</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gorka]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 12:19:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Liberal sanctuary "nazis" - THEY are allowed "sanctuary cities", only when THEY want to. on Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:44:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I think that's 22 of 36 or so now
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/855183</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/855183</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MLD Woody]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:44:48 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>