@logicisforsquares said:

They can carry on as they will. Just making comment. I am very pro gun but if I scream from the roof tops about how I need a bazooka, I might lose some of the fence sitters.

I can live with you owning a bazooka. ?

WSS

@westside-steve said:

Yeah, and?

WSS

They can carry on as they will. Just making comment. I am very pro gun but if I scream from the roof tops about how I need a bazooka, I might lose some of the fence sitters.

@logicisforsquares said:

That whole situation is absurd and only damages the case for women to get abortions. In Virginia, I think you can toss toddlers into a wood chipper.

Yeah, and?

WSS

@calfoxwc said:

well, that went out the window with pba, and ending life after babies are born because the mother decided it was inconvenient.

That whole situation is absurd and only damages the case for women to get abortions. In Virginia, I think you can toss toddlers into a wood chipper.

@gorka said:

"Reproductive rights"  LOL... like "pro choice" are  terms intended to humanize or mask an underlying agenda that is repulsive...the freedom for a woman to kill her baby.

Call it what it is man.

You can call it “ultra Slayer baby head mashing” but that won’t change that there are a good deal of people who see it as a reproductive issue and not baby murder.

@logicisforsquares said:

“Mission: The mission of Planned Parenthood is to provide comprehensive reproductive and complementary health care services in settings which preserve and protect the essential privacy and rights of each individual, to advocate public policies which guarantee these rights and ensure access to such services..”

If you wonder why Planned Parenthood are filing a law suit, you can look at their mission statement. If they didn’t file that law suit, they would be doing a shitty job of advocating for public policy that protects reproductive rights   the womans right to terminate the life of her baby.

"Reproductive rights"  LOL... like "pro choice" are  terms intended to humanize or mask an underlying agenda that is repulsive...the freedom for a woman to kill her baby.

Call it what it is man.

If you wonder why Planned Parenthood are filing a law suit, you can look at their mission statement. If they didn’t file that law suit, they would be doing a shitty job of advocating for public policy that protects reproductive rights. 

@oldbrownsfan said:

The difference is the NRA leaves no doubt they are pro second amendment and everyone knows where they stand. Planned Parenthood constantly tries to act like abortions play a minor role in their operations...Planned Parenthood is heavily invested in abortion no matter how much they try and minimize it to the public. The lawsuit only goes to illustrate it.

Is abortion considered a women’s health issue to a good bit of the public?

@clevfan4life said:

why does the NRA get involved everytime theres a "gun issue"? makes no sense, why would an organization cslled the national rifle associstion bother itself?

?

The difference is the NRA leaves no doubt they are pro second amendment and everyone knows where they stand. Planned Parenthood constantly tries to act like abortions play a minor role in their operations...Planned Parenthood is heavily invested in abortion no matter how much they try and minimize it to the public. The lawsuit only goes to illustrate it.

@westside-steve said:

Plus, morals be damned, it's costing them money. It's all about the do ray mi.

WSS

No doubt that is a perk.

@oldbrownsfan said:

so why are they even bothering to sue? 

why does the NRA get involved everytime theres a "gun issue"? makes no sense, why would an organization cslled the national rifle associstion bother itself?

?

@logicisforsquares said:

If Planned Parenthood is an org that does press for women's bodily autonomy and health, it makes sense that they would sue. Nothing nefarious, just makes sense.

Plus, morals be damned, it's costing them money. It's all about the do ray mi.

WSS

@oldbrownsfan said:

Yet Officials from Planned Parenthood constantly tell us that abortions are only a small part of their services so why are they even bothering to sue? 

Because no one else had to this point? It is still a women's health issue. 

@oldbrownsfan said:

Planned Parenthood always tries to minimize and distance themselves from the abortions they perform but this lawsuit calls them out for the very active and pro abortion organization  they really are.

If Planned Parenthood is an org that does press for women's bodily autonomy and health, it makes sense that they would sue. Nothing nefarious, just makes sense.

@vambo said:

https://www.lifenews.com/2019/04/12/planned-parenthood-sues-arizona-because-its-pro-life-laws-have-saved-too-many-babies-from-abortion/?fbclid=IwAR3AfmXEaQc2AotugnNqLnMSyq-DBcL2LkQhzGEeHRxE56f4N7P8NM5P3_o

The abortion giant Planned Parenthood just filed a massive new lawsuit against a series of pro-life Arizona laws that are saving unborn babies from abortion.

Planned Parenthood always tries to minimize and distance themselves from the abortions they perform but this lawsuit calls them out for the very active and pro abortion organization  they really are.