https://spectator.org/did-peter-strzok-present-the-steele-dossier-to-the-fisa-court/

NOTE:

dirty corrupt strzok had a friendly judge on the FISA court.

approach papadolpolis and try to GET him in a "sting" operation.

All based on higgardly campaign's dirty soviet-based misinformation bought and paid for - the steele

dossier, with a critical lack of information sent to the FISA court.

and they were in a hurry to affect the upcoming elections something awful.

https://thehill.com/hilltv/rising/395776-memos-detail-fbis-hurry-the-f-up-pressure-to-probe-trump-campaign

    obaMao'd dirty comey had an ...agent? female...find Papadopolos and try to seduce him and prod

information from him.

  And the other guy who insisted on meeting with him....

and...

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/us-informant-reportedly-tried-to-probe-papadopoulos-on-trump-russia-ties-seduce-him-during-campaign

The Times reported that the FBI sent a woman using the alias Azra Turk to meet Papadopoulos at a London bar, where she asked, conspicuously and directly, whether the Trump team was working with Russia.

Papadopoulos told Fox News on Thursday that he "immediately thought she was an agent, but a Turkish agent, or working with the CIA," and "that's why I never accepted her overtures and met her again after London. ...  London became a very bizarre hangout spot for me that year."

Papadopoulos told Fox News that he saw Turk three times in London: once over drinks, another over dinner, and then once with Stefan Halper, the Cambridge professor who has been a longtime FBI informant. The Times noted that Turk had apparently been sent to oversee Halper, and possibly to provide cover for Halper in the event Turk needed to testify.

In House testimony, Papadopoulos previously said Turk "didn't strike me as a Cambridge associate at all" and noted that "her English was very bad." According to Papadopoulos, "the professors liked to introduce me to young beautiful women."

On Twitter Thursday, Papadopoulos emphasized that Turk's English was poor, and disputed the Times' reporting that Turk was sent by the FBI. "She was CIA and affiliated with Turkish intel," he wrote.

"As someone who has worked a lot in the Middle East and Southern Europe on policy issues and energy issues, as I was heavily involved in from 2011-2017, I would notice odd behavior of people I later learned were agents," Papadopoulos told Fox News.

When asked when he learned Turk was an agent, Papadopoulos replied: "I always had suspicions but the moment Halper was outed a year ago, I knew she was, too."

69% want the origins of the investigation investigated.

https://pjmedia.com/trending/cnn-poll-overwhelming-majority-want-investigation-into-obama-doj-spying-of-trump/

obstruction of justice to a sham charge of collusion?

is a contradiction on its face alone. 

William Barr's best conclusion to how the DOJ interprets criminality in anything Muellers report tries to conclude 

is simply the one is presumed innocent and must be proven guilty

do the democrats really believe themselves as being  "smart" to concoct such BULLSHIT 

and keep this alive to their own collective demise come election time in 2020? 

@clevfan4life said:

god......i love that guy. See we love that guy no matter who he's trolling....u guys only love him when he's trolling liberals. 

That's wonderful Cleve but that wouldn't have anything to do with double standards. Horrible example.

That's like sayin I have double standards because I love the Browns but hate the stealers. That said, I laughed at nearly every scene in that movie and cared nothing about who he was trolling. I'm sure the majority fell into that category.

Only two scenes in that move were rehearsed, the rest was all ad lib.

"May George Bush drink the blood of every man woman and child in Afghanistan!lol

There was never any collusion between Trump and Russia, and these officials likely knew that all along. That their coup attempt failed makes it no less of an attempt.

https://humanevents.com/2019/05/01/yes-there-was-an-attempted-coup-against-trump/

@texasag1969 said:

Actually you are wrong about that. I've had no problem whatsoever saying I hated voting for hillarity. But I damn sure wasn't voting for the liar king either. And I already proved that I could not even write in McCain in my state, which is what I wanted to do.

But here's the thing. Had positions been reversed and the Russian had done what they did for Trump for hillarity instead and won the important swing state electoral votes, you, cal and all the rest would be leading the charge to get the Clinton administration to be doing something to stop that from happening again. And you'd all be claiming "rigged" just like your dear leader would be doing had he lost. And Trump still has not filled the cybersecurity position which would be in charge of fixing this so the Russians can't repeat 2016. He wants their help again in 2020 (though I think the dems are doing a fine job of insuring his reelection with all their way too far out there BS).

That is just stupid. Why didn't your obaMao jump all over the russian hacking? because he didn't want to taint your higgardly's "impending victory".

remember higgardly calling on Trump to respect the results of the election?

yeah, your russians created a fake dossier that ridiculed Trump. You think that was to help HIM get elected?

You proud of being totally out to lunch over all your slurs that have NO basis at all? All emoting, no thinking = Texsag. LOL

@diehardbrownsfan said:

You're just unwilling to admit you voted for a piece of shit.

Actually you are wrong about that. I've had no problem whatsoever saying I hated voting for hillarity. But I damn sure wasn't voting for the liar king either. And I already proved that I could not even write in McCain in my state, which is what I wanted to do.

But here's the thing. Had positions been reversed and the Russian had done what they did for Trump for hillarity instead and won the important swing state electoral votes, you, cal and all the rest would be leading the charge to get the Clinton administration to be doing something to stop that from happening again. And you'd all be claiming "rigged" just like your dear leader would be doing had he lost. And Trump still has not filled the cybersecurity position which would be in charge of fixing this so the Russians can't repeat 2016. He wants their help again in 2020 (though I think the dems are doing a fine job of insuring his reelection with all their way too far out there BS).

@texasag1969 said:

Like I said, unwilling to entertain the potential of creating a 70,000 vote difference via Russian operations directed at propagandizing in far more effective ways than Trumpettes are willing to admit.

You're just unwilling to admit you voted for a piece of shit.