<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Interesting Team Rankings]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/11812689" rel="external nofollow">http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/11812689</a></p>

<p>
I like the idea, but I see a lot of problems with his player rankings.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/5377/interesting-team-rankings</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 11:00:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/5377.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 19:56:50 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Interesting Team Rankings on Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:24:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/shepwrite" aria-label="Profile: shepwrite">@<bdi>shepwrite</bdi></a> said:</p>Interesting, but they should probably confine it to teams with established players at all four key spots. It's tough to say that Mark Sanchez is one of the worst quarterbacks in the league before he takes a snap, or that Quinn ranks 27th with one healthy start under his belt and a 104 passer rating.</blockquote>
<p>
Yes, thats one of the many problems ran into when trying to rank the players. From the looks of this, the Eagles and Pats have just average pass rushes. It doesn't take into account some teams get heavy pass rushes through a team effort. Not just a single top rusher.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/82617</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/82617</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Spunkonmyback DPOY]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 20:24:30 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>