<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[TEAMS SLOW TO RE-SIGN 2005 DRAFT PICS]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>interesting article regarding the 2005 draft class and the possiblity of an uncapped year.</p>
<p>
<a href="http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=AgfwDiqr8m87P19h.XfconAdsLYF?slug=jc-05draftclasscontracts070709&amp;prov=yhoo&amp;type=lgns" rel="external nofollow">http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=Agfw...o&amp;type=lgns</a></p>

<p>
Braylon may not be a free agent after this year after all. I agree with the article that teams will try to leverage the possibility of an uncapped year to hold onto players longer. Players will have to wait another year to become free agents. I hope they get a deal done as we certainly don't want a  strike year when the league is going so well. It explains why the Browns have done nothing to re-sign Braylon. They may have 2 years instead of 1 to work something out.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/5411/teams-slow-to-re-sign-2005-draft-pics</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 09:55:53 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/5411.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 03:48:09 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>