<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[OLine analysis: 49ers game]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	I’m attempting something Tour used to do, a comprehensive analysis of the OL in the  49ers game. I only got through the first 5 series, which is the first quarter and then some. I made notes. Many notes. There is a key and a half assed grading system. I worked right to left on all plays.
</p>

<p>
	The key is the key: H = Hubbard, K = Kush, T = Tretter, B = Bitonio, R = Robinson. Other players show up with numbers. 86 = Brown,   88 = Harris, 25 = Hilliard, 24 = Chubb, 67 = McCray (yes, he makes a cameo), 80 - Landry, OBJ = himself. 
</p>

<p>
	Grading system
</p>

<p>
	 - means l felt the player did ok that play. They did what they were asked to do on the play and were effective
</p>

<p>
	 + means l felt the player did above and beyond just good on the play. Maybe blocked a couple dudes, maybe laid an exceptional block. Maybe made an athletic move to pick up a delayed blitzer. Things like that. 
</p>

<p>
	£ means the player did a poor job at doing what was expected during the play and they were a weight on the team. Get it?
</p>

<p>
	Plays will be noted much like Tour used to. S = series, P = plays. So S1P3 is series one play 3. Notes and side bars are included.
</p>

<p>
	S1P1: OBJ to 80. All Olmen get a -, it was basically 3 rushers against 6 blockers. Baker picked up the 4th rusher the line chose to ignore. That was fun for a moment. Well designed play.
</p>

<p>
	S1P2: OBJ drop. H -, K + for a respectable crash chip and then being in position for a next level block, T -, B + for a nifty motion, kind of pausing and then doing a half pull, R -, 86 -, 88 -
</p>

<p>
	S1P3: False start 86. He puts his butt up and looks right. Is that really a false start?
</p>

<p>
	S1P4: Chubb run. H -, K -, T + started blocking one guy then transitioned to another, walled off his area, B -, R -, 88 -, 86 £ Pharoah fucked up. His man got past him for the tackle.
</p>

<p>
	S1P5: Incomplete to Seals kiss from a Rose. H + for a good sustained block in the vicinity of where Baker was, K - barely, gave up ground, T -, B + for the bail out block assist for..., R £ got pushed back like a bitch into Baker’s grill. Punt...
</p>

<p>
	S2P1: Int. H £ tough assignment to hold a block that long, but he got holdy, K -, T -, B -, R -, 88 £ got beat and pushed back into Baker.
</p>

<p>
	Note: I’m realizing the Browns ask a lot of their TEs in blocking schemes. 
</p>

<p>
	S3P1: Chubb run. 86 + for handling a firecracker of a pass rusher, H - I wavered on a lower grade because l thought he shoulda been the guy best suited to pick up a delayed blitzer instead of Landry, 80 - did his best with a terrible angle, K + for basically corralling 2 rushers at one point, heads up arm bar, T -, B -, R -.
</p>

<p>
	S3P2: Incomplete to OBJ. H - good fight Hubbard-,  K -, T + for awareness. Starts off tag teaming with Kush, checks left, blocks right, B -, R + for a nice chip and power shove that caused dominoes, 88 - roadblocked a couple rushers, 86 -.
</p>

<p>
	S3P3: Baker sack. H - barely, K - l woulda liked to have seen him pick up a delayed blitzer, but he probably thought the ball was already passed, T -, B -, R -, 25 £ blew it. Punt...
</p>

<p>
	S4P1: Chubb run. 86 - nicely done, H £ did a chip and next level move, but looked really shitty on the next level block attempt, K - his dude did make the tackle, but l thought Kush stood tall here, T + did a chip and respectable next level block, B -, R -, OBJ and Landry are the funnest part about this play, both sweeping outta the backfield to clear the right side like mighty twin fullbacks, but Chubb doesn’t follow them? Shame.
</p>

<p>
	S4P2: Chubb run. H £ he whiffed on 2 dudes, K £ got away with holding, + was a man among men this play, sealed off 2 dudes, key block to 1st down run, B + he manhandled some men here too, R -, 88 -, 86 -. 
</p>

<p>
	S4P3: Chubb run. TE (?) -, H -, K -, T - he ducks behind Bito and then picks up Bito’s guy so Bito can go next level, B -, R £ he whiffed on every blocking opportunity this play. Note: it looks like Landry is calling out blocking assignments before this play, but then whiffs on his own block. 80 £
</p>

<p>
	S4P4: Chubb run. 86 -, H -, K -, T -, R -, 88 - stout on Bosa.
</p>

<p>
	S4P5: Baker fumble. H + for fending off one guy and then fending off Kush’s guy, K - he did ok here but found himself sorta trap blocked, T - he got held here, 99 tugging the collar, B -, R £ basically sucked, Bito saved his ass. 
</p>

<p>
	Note: I think l am done with Greg Robinson. I grow weary of his lack of tenacity. I think we literally have TEs who block better than him.
</p>

<p>
	S5P1: Chubb run. H -, K -pulled then next level block, T -, B - tough play, got twisted around with Kush scooting behind him, R -, 86 - did ok on Bosa.
</p>

<p>
	S5P2: Landry reception. 67 - McCray sighting, H -, K £ got beat and tried to arm bar the defender, luckily Chubb there for the bail out block, T -, B -, R £ tried to hockey check Bosa, and it was not effective.
</p>

<p>
	S5P3: 88 - respectable block and release to catch a pass, H -, K -, T -, B -, R -,.
</p>

<p>
	S5P4: H -, K - Kush can lay a lick, did so here and then picked up a guy coming around that guy, T -, B - maybe held a guy, R - seemed to mostly be blocking a guy in the back, 88 - Bosa again, 80 - with a respectable block.
</p>

<p>
	S5P5: Jarvis reception. H - barely, K -, T -, B -, R -.
</p>

<p>
	S5P6: OBJ run. H - well played, ignores the de and turns in, and then turns out after the end around develops to wall off a defender, K -, T -, B -, R - best shove back block l’ve seen from him, 88 + it’s fun watching him on this play, he acts almost like a fullback sweeping behind the line and thinks about blocking 2 guys before he found a third guy to block. 
</p>

<p>
	S5P7: Chubb run. H -, K -, T -, R -, 80 £ was actually a key block in the play and didn’t quite get it, 86 £ kinda got beat too.
</p>

<p>
	Note: Calloway is an awkward blocker.
</p>

<p>
	S5P8: Incompletion. H -, K -, T -, B - barely, gave up a lil ground, R -.
</p>

<p>
	S5P9: Incompletion. H - sustained a decently long block but got bowled over, K -  if you’re gonna get knocked down, take ‘em with you, T -, B -, R -, 88 - good chuck on Bosa. FG...
</p>

<p>
	Notes: our TEs are decent blockers. I also like that the receivers are clearly involved in the blocking scheme. 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/54577/oline-analysis-49ers-game</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 06:06:53 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/54577.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 03:03:29 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to OLine analysis: 49ers game on Fri, 11 Oct 2019 16:00:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Their FB is out for 4-6 weeks, so I'm interested to see how that affects them.  He's the straw that stirs the drink, so I'm assuming they won't be near as good.  
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/893886</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/893886</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[jiggins7919]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 16:00:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to OLine analysis: 49ers game on Fri, 11 Oct 2019 13:31:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/texasag1969" aria-label="Profile: texasag1969">@<bdi>texasag1969</bdi></a> <a href="/post/893851">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			I'll bet the DL graded #32 for run stopping. Jesssssssssss over 10 ypc!
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	I think we need to give the niners OL some credit as well. <br />
	 
</p>

<p>
	Their OL ranked #1 in run blocking and #2 in pass protection.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/893861</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/893861</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Canton Dawg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 13:31:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to OLine analysis: 49ers game on Fri, 11 Oct 2019 12:23:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/canton-dawg" aria-label="Profile: canton-dawg">@<bdi>canton-dawg</bdi></a> <a href="/post/893830">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			From the O-line rankings I saw following the 49’ers game, the Browns graded out at #20 for run blocking, and #26 for pass protection. 
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	I'll bet the DL graded #32 for run stopping. Jesssssssssss over 10 ypc!
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/893851</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/893851</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[TexasAg1969]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 12:23:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to OLine analysis: 49ers game on Fri, 11 Oct 2019 10:15:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	From the O-line rankings I saw following the 49’ers game, the Browns graded out at #20 for run blocking, and #26 for pass protection. 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/893830</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/893830</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Canton Dawg]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 10:15:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to OLine analysis: 49ers game on Fri, 11 Oct 2019 04:25:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Not much to ANAL - Ise!
</p>



<p>
	They sucked!!
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/893824</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/893824</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[nickers]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2019 04:25:52 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>