<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The last 3 drafts]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	<a href="https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/cle/draft.htm" rel="external nofollow">https://www.pro-football-reference.com/teams/cle/draft.htm</a>
</p>



<p>
	Some are griping that even the last 3 drafts weren't that great. I disagree. Compared to the 20 before it, I think they were mostly solid. 
</p>

<p>
	2019
</p>

<p>
	2.46 (but their 1st pick). Greedy. Jury is not out. Knock on him was he wasn't physical enough, but neither was Deion Sanders, and if he became 70% of DS, he'd be a great pick. I haven't seen enough to know yet if the kid is a player or not, but he could be.
</p>

<p>
	3.80 Takitaki, LB. Has 2 tackles for his career so far. Was hoping for more production, even as a rookie. Not looking bright.
</p>

<p>
	4.119 Sheldrick Redwine, S. Does he ever see the field? Liked his speed (4.44) and diversity (played CB some) but where's the beef?
</p>

<p>
	5.155 Mack Wilson, LB. Most had high hopes for him, and he's not been bad (about 5 tackles a game, about 2 less a game then Devin Bush, who is raved about). For a 5th rounder, pretty good.
</p>

<p>
	5.170 Kicker. Solid.
</p>

<p>
	2018
</p>

<p>
	1.1 Baker. By end season last year, everyone would say it was a genius pick, right now? Not so much. We just don't know yet. 
</p>

<p>
	1.4 D. Ward, CB. He sure looked like the real deal before he got hurt. He better be an annual pro bowler taken 4th pick over all. We'll see. He isn't there yet.
</p>

<p>
	2.33 Corbett, C/OG. Very bad bust. A SECOND round OG should dominate. He hasn't.
</p>

<p>
	2.35 Chubb, HB. Super pick. Just has to stop fumbling. 
</p>

<p>
	3.67 Chad Thomas, DE. Who? Does he play? Not a tackle never mind a sack.
</p>

<p>
	4.105 Calloway, WR. Has the skill set to make plays, some character issues hung around. Work in progress. 
</p>



<p>
	2017
</p>

<p>
	1.1 Garrett, DE. Talent is undeniable. 2nd in league in sacks (10). Now we need to see him make some "difference maker" type of plays. Not a disappointment yet. Could approach 20 sacks this season.
</p>

<p>
	1.25 Peppers, S. I felt he was overrated and drafted too high. Traded him away regardless, but he's still playing. I felt his athleticism didn't always translate in his play.  He has a total of 1 int this season but does average about 8 tackles a game. 
</p>

<p>
	1.29 Njoke, TE. I feel there were better players at this spot (TJ Watt), and all I ever hear about is how "talented" he is. Ummm, going on 3rd year, where is the production to go along with all that talent? (I know he has been hurt). 
</p>

<p>
	----------------You might better players with THREE 1st round picks-------------------------
</p>



<p>
	2.52 Kizer, QB. This is a high pick to waste. Has the NFL size and arm, just not the brain. I never thought he was gonna be any good.
</p>

<p>
	3.65 Ogunjobi, DT. Not bad at all. 
</p>

<p>
	No one else, really.
</p>



<p>
	All said and done, we don't know everything, but it appears the drafting has improved over the decade before these 3, I think. 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/54904/the-last-3-drafts</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 13:00:01 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/54904.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 22:49:56 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The last 3 drafts on Mon, 11 Nov 2019 01:29:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tour2ma" aria-label="Profile: tour2ma">@<bdi>tour2ma</bdi></a> <a href="/post/900601">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			If you look at your "analysis" of each individual pick, there's not a single one you either don't pick at (if not apart) or say is "too early to tell."
		</p>

		

		<p>
			Hard to see how that adds up to "disagreeing" and "mostly solid".
		</p>

		
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Maybe you're just too sensitive. 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/900649</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/900649</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Icecube]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2019 01:29:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The last 3 drafts on Sun, 10 Nov 2019 22:44:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/icecube" aria-label="Profile: icecube">@<bdi>icecube</bdi></a> <a href="/post/900331">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			No thoughts on this?
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/icecube" aria-label="Profile: icecube">@<bdi>icecube</bdi></a> <a href="/post/900202">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Some are griping that even the last 3 drafts weren't that great. I disagree. Compared to the 20 before it, I think they were mostly solid. 
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	If you look at your "analysis" of each individual pick, there's not a single one you either don't pick at (if not apart) or say is "too early to tell."
</p>



<p>
	Hard to see how that adds up to "disagreeing" and "mostly solid".
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/900601</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/900601</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tour2ma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2019 22:44:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The last 3 drafts on Sun, 10 Nov 2019 06:56:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/gumby73" aria-label="Profile: gumby73">@<bdi>gumby73</bdi></a> <a href="/post/900337">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Dorsey can draft good talent. <strong>But till we assemble a complete* working coaching staff..We will continue to see guys like Shelton/Erving/Duke/Fells/Peppers/Hyde/Rodrick Johnson/G.Avery/ect.ect..</strong>.get to better coaching staffs that simply coach these guys better at their positions including knowing what they can't do.. am keeping my eyes on Corbett at the Rams next <span>?</span> Bad coaching staffs don't slip into playoffs 
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	I'd love to know how the coaches' meetings are going. 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/900412</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/900412</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Icecube]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 10 Nov 2019 06:56:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The last 3 drafts on Sat, 09 Nov 2019 21:21:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/icecube" aria-label="Profile: icecube">@<bdi>icecube</bdi></a> <a href="/post/900331">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			No thoughts on this?
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Dorsey can draft good talent. But till we assemble a complete* working coaching staff..We will continue to see guys like Shelton/Erving/Duke/Fells/Peppers/Hyde/Rodrick Johnson/G.Avery/ect.ect...get to better coaching staffs that simply coach these guys better at their positions including knowing what they can't do.. am keeping my eyes on Corbett at the Rams next <span>?</span> Bad coaching staffs don't slip into playoffs 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/900337</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/900337</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[gumby73]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2019 21:21:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The last 3 drafts on Sat, 09 Nov 2019 20:38:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	No thoughts on this?
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/900331</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/900331</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Icecube]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2019 20:38:32 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>