@dutch-oven said:

Yes. 

OK,  I appreciate the honesty.  

@the-gipper said:

Are you all too stupid to have an opinion on which QBs will dominate each conference in the next decade?   Evidence seems to confirm an affirmative answer to that question. 

Yes. 

@dutch-oven said:

You made your mom wish she would have just swallowed, instead. 

My my yet another "Your Mom blah blah" LOL

 Your comebacks are so fresh and cutting edge!

@gorka said:

I made Dutch Boy lose sleep. LOL

You made your mom wish she would have just swallowed, instead. 

@dutch-oven said:

I totally believe this, in fact, was thinking this last night. 

I made Dutch Boy lose sleep. LOL

@dutch-oven said:

Footballs are also known as "pigskins". 

Please....don't....don't overwhelm us with the extent of your knowledge!

@the-gipper said:

You dorks got anything to say about football?  Or do you just want to proliferate what it is that you are complaining about him for? 

Footballs are also known as "pigskins". 

@dutch-oven said:

I totally believe this, in fact, was thinking this last night. 

You dorks got anything to say about football?  Or do you just want to proliferate what it is that you are complaining about him for? 

@mld-woody said:

O believe some of them are alt accounts of previously banned users

I totally believe this, in fact, was thinking this last night. 

@dutch-oven said:

This clown had well over 1000 posts before I ever saw him post on the Browns forum... 

O believe some of them are alt accounts of previously banned users

@mld-woody said:

Every sane person left the poli board and now they're bored lol

This clown had well over 1000 posts before I ever saw him post on the Browns forum... 

As far as Baker, I agree with your assessment of the AFC QB situation, it's pretty slim on MLK day 2020, and would say that he has a wonderful opportunity to lead his team into the competitive company of the elite.

My goal for the Browns' 2020 postseason is to see Baker during the game and not during commercial breaks.

AFCE:   Every team has a candidate:    NYG, Daniel Jones,  Dallas, Prescott,  Wash....Haskins,   Philly....Wentz

AFCS: Brees is 41, Matt Ryan will be 35 in May.  Cam Newton is 30....he could be dominant if he can be healthy...and has a Brady/Brees/BR/Rivers type of the last half of his career.    Jameis Winston?   Nothing has shown me he is going to be a consistent winner

AFCN:  Rogers will be 37 during next season.    Matt Stafford is only 31....again, the comment above about Newton applies to him:  he would need to have a real productive last half of his career.     Kirk Cousins 31.....and the comments re  Stafford and Newton apply here to him.  Mitch Trubisky....seems a longshot, but the team is tough around him. 

AFCW.   You have Russell Wilson.   I fully expect him to have Brady/Brees longevity and production..and besides, he has already appeared in 2 NFC title games and 2 SBs.  I expect to see him in a couple more.   Garropolo is in the Super Bowl,  Goff was in the Super Bowl last year,...so those 2 have a chance.    and Kyler Murray was just a rookie. 

So, I don't think I can cut this down to 6 names.  Wilson and Ryan have already appeared in 2 each.  Certainly possible if not probable for them to reach 3.   Newton, Goff and now Garropolo are starters that each have one.  They could contend. 

I am stuck:  who do you think will be the dominant NFC QBs the next decade (from current players)

Brady vs. Peyton......4 times

Brady vs.  Ben R.....2 times 

This from the past 15 years, or so.

So, who are going to be the  Brady/Peyton/BR  of the next  10-15 years.   Lets stay in the AFC for now.

I am hearing jabber on the TV today that the talking heads think that the 3 dominant QBs in the AFC over the next decade that will lead their team to the AFC title game will be   Mahomes, Watson, and Jackson.

Do you think this is reality, or not?    

Mahomes looks clearly like one of them....he has already been there twice in his two full years of starting?  But so far I am NOT convinced about the other 2.  

Looke at each division: 

 Will either Darnold or Josh Allen  from the AFCE be multiple AFC title game QBs? (taking Brady out...no 10 years there)

Will Baker Mayfield break into this equation.......obviously we all hope so, but do you think so?  And if the Bitchy Pussies take Joe Burrow, will he be all that that people think, or not?  And there is Jackson in this division to deal with.  (take BR out, no 10 years there)

I also think that other than Watson, the QB situations in the AFCS are in flux.  Tannehill is a FA...but by no means do I think that he has the goods to be a decade long winner.  And do the Colts and Jags even have a starter?

In the AFCW....of course, you have Mahomes.  And Derek Carr has not established that he can be one of those guys. Drew Lock in Denver?  Clearly no data there.   And the Chargers look like they are definitely losing Rivers (who I would take out anyway). 

So, to me, that leaves us with these names for that AFC dominant QB label:

Darnold;   Allen;  Darnold; Jackson; Mayfield; Watson; Mahomes.......

Who you got to  make the original list I put on here as    3 time AFC title game starting QBs? 

@mjp28 said:

But where is the belly button?   

Leaving a little to the imagination.

@gorka said:

This is a wine glass.

But where is the belly button?   

@gorka said:

OK whatever.

Did you see Darryl Lamonica play? Super Bowl II vs. the Packers?

Yes 

@the-gipper said:

Didn’t see it

OK whatever.

Did you see Darryl Lamonica play? Super Bowl II vs. the Packers?

@gorka said:

That should have been obvious.

If I had just said that only one QB never made it to a Super Bowl and left it at that,  you would no doubt have come back with " Bernie did with the Cowboys"  just to prove how smart you think you are.

I was being proactive and shut that shit down.

I would not of said Bernie because Bernie did not start the Super Bowl game these are super bowl starting quarterbacks not back ups

@the-gipper said:

OK that was your surface point but what was your underlying implication

That should have been obvious.

If I had just said that only one QB never made it to a Super Bowl and left it at that,  you would no doubt have come back with " Bernie did with the Cowboys"  just to prove how smart you think you are.

I was being proactive and shut that shit down.

@gorka said:

Does this mean you didn't like my latest optical illusion?

Didn’t see it

@the-gipper said:

If you don’t like football and what are you doing on this board again this is just about football but very little of what you post on this board is about football. So why the fuck are you even on here.

Does this mean you didn't like my latest optical illusion?