<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[WAT!!!!!]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>now i love victor but we do have shopach but i was just watching fox 8 news and just found out that we passed on trading victor for clay bucholtz from boston that would have been a great trade for us but we passed wow</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/5561/wat</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 01:58:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/5561.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:02:40 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to WAT!!!!! on Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:22:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Peter Gammons said it was Boston who turned it down. </p>

<p>
If it was a straight up Victor-Buchholz trade, that's pretty terrible to me. Sure, we need pitching badly. But a switch hitting, above .300 average catcher with power...who's also an incredible clubhouse guy with a very reasonable contract should draw much more.</p>

<p>
Buchholz was pretty amazing his rookie year, but last year went 2-9 with a 6.75 ERA and a 1.77 WHIP. He's having a much better year in AAA this year, but it should say something that he still hasn't become a fixture the Red Sox rotation (as he goes 4 innings, throws 90 pitches, 6 hits, 2 walks, 3 ER for the loss tonight). Can't say I'm a big fan.</p>


<p>
If it was a package deal with Buchholz as the centerpiece...I can understand it I suppose. But all things considered, and factoring in the Red Sox' win now position and their dire need for a catcher...we should be able to do much better.</p>



<p>
And I can guarantee you Kelly Shoppach doesn't factor into any of the decision making regarding trading Victor. He has no business as a starting catcher.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/86038</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/86038</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[CIMO.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 03:22:49 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>