<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[One Ventilator for 9 Patients]]></title><description><![CDATA[<h1 style="background-color:#ffffff;color:#333333">
	Canadian Doctor Rigs Ventilator to Treat Nine Patients Instead of Just One
</h1>

<p>
	<span><a href="https://interestingengineering.com/canadian-doctor-rigs-ventilator-to-treat-nine-patients-instead-of-just-one" rel="external nofollow">https://interestingengineering.com/canadian-doctor-rigs-ventilator-to-treat-nine-patients-instead-of-just-one</a></span>
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/55992/one-ventilator-for-9-patients</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 05:58:18 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/55992.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2020 11:23:04 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to One Ventilator for 9 Patients on Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:08:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tour2ma" aria-label="Profile: tour2ma">@<bdi>tour2ma</bdi></a> <a href="/post/926341">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Bennett?
		</p>

		

		<p>
			So nine hoses on one machine... why not 12? or 15?
		</p>

		<p>
			Cross contamination... differing lung capacities... differing lung elasticities... differing degrees of lungs being compromised by pneumonia...
		</p>

		<p>
			Probably the reason the innovator himself said...
		</p>

		<p>
			In other words the modification is in the same category as drug trails on the critically ill.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	I am really frugal. I was thinking about one deluxe ventilator and just running hoses everywhere...<span>?</span>
</p>

<p>
	Expanding the capacity of one ventilator though is something I think to consider in an emergency where there are no other good options,
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/926345</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/926345</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[OldBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:08:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to One Ventilator for 9 Patients on Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:02:20 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Bennett?
</p>



<p>
	So nine hoses on one machine... why not 12? or 15?
</p>

<p>
	Cross contamination... differing lung capacities... differing lung elasticities... differing degrees of lungs being compromised by pneumonia...
</p>

<p>
	Probably the reason the innovator himself said...
</p>

<blockquote>
	

	
		<p>
			"At one point we may not have other options," Gauthier told <em>CBC News</em>. "The option could be well, we let people die or we <em>give that a chance</em>."
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	In other words the modification is in the same category as drug trails on the critically ill.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/926341</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/926341</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tour2ma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:02:20 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to One Ventilator for 9 Patients on Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:59:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Not good for Puritan Bennett.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/926051</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/926051</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gorka]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2020 13:59:53 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>