<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Joe on thin ice?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	For anyone who is considering voting against Trump and for the Democratic candidate do you think the Dems will actually scuttle the Biden nomination? Do you think it's wise? If I was a DNC advisor I might give that a 60/40 shot for success. A new candidate out of the blue would not have years of baggage and or the hint of dementia. Kind of like Obama.
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://nypost.com/2020/03/28/democrats-need-to-recruit-obama-to-bench-biden-find-another-candidate-goodwin/" rel="external nofollow">https://nypost.com/2020/03/28/democrats-need-to-recruit-obama-to-bench-biden-find-another-candidate-goodwin/</a>
</p>

<p>
	WSS
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/56053/joe-on-thin-ice</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 03:34:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/56053.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2020 10:42:00 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:40:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	"but then never remember where he hid them"
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/930717</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/930717</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 14:40:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Mon, 13 Apr 2020 03:47:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	<img src="https://scontent.ftpa1-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/93109783_10215866150223476_8474135083924586496_n.jpg?_nc_cat=111&amp;_nc_sid=8024bb&amp;_nc_oc=AQlFKvzNjGrPPD95mAFoYx2H-DF5y-_DrJRgsgggzNhtxvi2YnWUp-BrEb0r0AT85s4&amp;_nc_ht=scontent.ftpa1-2.fna&amp;oh=1176f683ed14ad04913ece8f73c05c8c&amp;oe=5EB81995" alt="93109783_10215866150223476_8474135083924" /></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/930670</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/930670</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Axe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 03:47:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Sun, 12 Apr 2020 05:06:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	well, woodpecker, just once, bird up and tell us how Pres Trump has failed and done bad things.
</p>

<p>
	Not that you would know bad things, you wouldn't admit any of them for eight years of your obaMao commie.
</p>

<p>
	A LOT of Real Americans LOVE the leadership that Pres Trump has shown.
</p>

<p>
	you just bitch at posters on the forum, otherwise, you can't muster much of any kind of legit opinion about anything.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/930512</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/930512</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2020 05:06:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Sun, 12 Apr 2020 03:30:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/gorka" aria-label="Profile: gorka">@<bdi>gorka</bdi></a> <a href="/post/930496">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		

		

		<p>
			Cal is right. Recall that those 2016 Trump campaign rallies were nothing like we've ever seen before. But if you weren't aware of that perhaps it was because CNN avoided coverage of those massive crowds at all costs.
		</p>

		<p>
			Those people that filled the arenas were not there because of "two terrible candidates".  Millions of former Obama voters from the rust belt states did not vote for Trump because they thought he was the better of two evils, I assure you.
		</p>

		<p>
			Anyone still touting that tired "both candidates were terrible" song and dance are simply in denial over the enthusiasm and excitement this guy generated.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	I disagree. Both candidates were terrible. And it's looking like we're headed for that again. Though the Dem candidate will have different baggage this time. Trump will just have more examples of the same baggage.
</p>















<p>
	Or maybe it's all a deep state conspiracy???? Maybe Clinton foundation uranium one Wuhan lab Coronavirus Benghazi? 
</p>

<p>
	Wake up sheeple
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/930497</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/930497</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MLD Woody]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2020 03:30:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Sun, 12 Apr 2020 03:21:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/calfoxwc" aria-label="Profile: calfoxwc">@<bdi>calfoxwc</bdi></a> <a href="/post/927710">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Woody - "two terrible candidates" isn't why Pres Trump won - it was time for the political pendulum to swing back.
		</p>

		
	
</blockquote>



<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tour2ma" aria-label="Profile: tour2ma">@<bdi>tour2ma</bdi></a> <a href="/post/928238">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			It was and yes, it is...
		</p>

		<p>
			Hope y'all keep underestimating, Joe as much as I did Trump... cost me a case of Christmas brew...
		</p>

		<p>
			Also never ceases to amaze me how a man of the people like cal fails to understand the role of unions.
		</p>

		

		
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Cal is right. Recall that those 2016 Trump campaign rallies were nothing like we've ever seen before. But if you weren't aware of that perhaps it was because CNN avoided coverage of those massive crowds at all costs.
</p>

<p>
	Those people that filled the arenas were not there because of "two terrible candidates".  Millions of former Obama voters from the rust belt states did not vote for Trump because they thought he was the better of two evils, I assure you.
</p>

<p>
	Anyone still touting that tired "both candidates were terrible" song and dance are simply in denial over the enthusiasm and excitement this guy generated.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/930496</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/930496</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Gorka]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2020 03:21:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Sun, 12 Apr 2020 02:50:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/diehardbrownsfan" aria-label="Profile: diehardbrownsfan">@<bdi>diehardbrownsfan</bdi></a> <a href="/post/930490">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Biden in a landslide.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Your wasted. Lol.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/930491</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/930491</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hammertime]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2020 02:50:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Sun, 12 Apr 2020 02:39:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Biden in a landslide.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/930490</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/930490</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[DieHardBrownsFan]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2020 02:39:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Sun, 12 Apr 2020 02:37:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Trump is a populist president..his america first agenda resonates with alot of americans.  He came along at the right time.  This whole crisis will only strengthen his position.  He wins again.  Dems just dont have a viable candidate.  
</p>

<p>
	When he starts bringing industry back from china especially big pharma...its a lock.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/930488</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/930488</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Kvoethe]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2020 02:37:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Fri, 10 Apr 2020 15:01:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<h2>
	<a href="https://www.conservapedia.com/Service_Employees_International_Union" rel="external nofollow">Service Employees International Union - Conservapedia</a>
</h2>

<div>
	<div>
		<cite>https://<strong>www.conservapedia.com</strong>/<strong>Service</strong>_Employees_<strong>International</strong>_<strong>Union</strong></cite>
	</div>

	<p>
		The <strong>Service</strong> Employees <strong>International Union</strong> (SEIU) is a <strong>socialist</strong>, politically powerful <strong>labor union</strong> with 2 million members in the <strong>United States</strong>, Canada, and Puerto Rico, and the largest <strong>union</strong> of <strong>property service</strong> workers in the United States.
	</p>

	<p>
		***************************************************
	</p>

	<p>
		Trump Cuts Off States From Skimming Medicaid Payments For ...
	</p>

	<p>
		<a href="https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/03/center-for-medicaid-services-seiu" rel="external nofollow">https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/03/center-for-medicaid-services-seiu</a>
	</p>

	<p>
		The new regulation will prevent states from skimming up to $150 million per year from Medicaid payments and diverting it to other causes. The Freedom Foundation found that in 2018 eight states – California, Connecticut, Illinois, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Oregon, Vermont and Washington – were skimming money off Medicaid payments to caretakers.
	</p>

	<p>
		Labor union unveils $150M campaign to help defeat Trump
	</p>

	<p>
		<a href="https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/feb/27/..." rel="external nofollow">https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/feb/27/...</a>
	</p>

	<p>
		Feb 27, 2020 · WASHINGTON (AP) — One of the nation’s largest labor unions is unveiling plans to invest $150 million in a nationwide campaign to help defeat President Donald Trump, a …
	</p>

	<p>
		*******************************************************
	</p>

	

	<p>
		<img alt="a4e5e13d1f2e56952d3468b7e1dd47905f37f639" height="350" src="http://www.quickmeme.com/img/a4/a4e5e13d1f2e56952d3468b7e1dd47905f37f6390e3fa68c4521d0ee491889e0.jpg" width="623" /></p>
</div>

<p>
	<a href="https://uploads.brownsboard.com/ips/monthly_2020_04/image.png.fa8c1c1a3ab32fb26da7ff6063ba0adf.png" data-fileid="16302"><img alt="image.png" data-fileid="16302" src="https://uploads.brownsboard.com/ips/monthly_2020_04/image.png.fa8c1c1a3ab32fb26da7ff6063ba0adf.png" /></a>
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/930138</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/930138</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2020 15:01:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Fri, 10 Apr 2020 14:49:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tour2ma" aria-label="Profile: tour2ma">@<bdi>tour2ma</bdi></a> <a href="/post/928261">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			The Corporate America you appear to want to save from unions is far more dangerous to the individual than any union will ever be. If Corporations are people (and they are not), then by and large they are soulless folk.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	True, but some corps are not soulless, they are just trying to stay in business. Greedy? some are. But some of the bigger unions are destructively corrupt. I'm not defending bad corps.
</p>

<p>
	  I'm talking about bad, powerful corrupt unions. Unions drove prices up, corps did not. Unions became far too powerful, the union brass got RICH, and eventually, the unions were not needed - they had terrific wages, safe working conditions, justified job security, etc etc.
</p>

<p>
	   But the union brass  didn't want to be not needed anymore - they picked battles that were not necessary, etc, and eventually went way leftwing socialist progressive democrat politically to continue to have a giant fight, albeit a fake one, to continue to focus members on a "struggle", instead of having members say - "well, why do we need a union anymore? why are we always paying union dues, and they back every democrat candidate no matter how corrupt etc" ???
</p>

<p>
	I'm not talking about good unions - this is not about firefighters, etc.
</p>

<p>
	***************************************************
</p>

<p>
	<span style="color:#c0392b">The <strong>AFL</strong>–<strong>CIO</strong> engages in substantial political spending and activism, typically in support of Democrats and liberal or progressive policies. The <strong>AFL</strong>–<strong>CIO</strong> was formed in 1955 when the <strong>AFL</strong> and the <strong>CIO</strong> merged after a long estrangement. Membership in the union peaked in 1979, when the <strong>AFL</strong>–<strong>CIO</strong> had nearly twenty million members. </span>
</p>

<p>
	*************************************************
</p>

<p>
	   That is the AFL-CIO, Their president? Richard Trumka.
</p>

<p>
	*************************************************
</p>

<p>
	<strong><span style="color:#c0392b">"AFL-CIO's Trumka: 'Socialism would be a step up for me ...</span></strong>
</p>

<p>
	<span><strong><span style="color:#c0392b"><a href="https://pjmedia.com/blog/afl-cios-trumka-socialism-would-be-a-step-up-for-me" rel="external nofollow">https://pjmedia.com/blog/afl-cios-trumka-socialism-would-be-a-step-up-for-me</a></span></strong></span>
</p>

<p>
	<strong><span style="color:#c0392b">AFL-CIO's Trumka: 'Socialism would be a step up for me' Everyone else is focusing fire on this article because, in it, AFL-CIO poobah Richard Trumka claims that unions just might withhold funds ...</span></strong>
</p>

<p>
	<strong><span style="color:#c0392b">Trumka Doesn't Know the Difference Between a Socialist and ...</span></strong>
</p>

<p>
	<span><strong><span style="color:#c0392b"><a href="https://www.independentsentinel.com/trumka-doesnt..." rel="external nofollow">https://www.independentsentinel.com/trumka-doesnt...</a></span></strong></span>
</p>

<p>
	<strong><span style="color:#c0392b">Sep 12, 2015 · Trumka was behind other acts of violence and the record proves it. He has had a long cozy relationship with socialists and communists. In 1994, Trumka proudly accepted the Eugene Debs Award named after the five-time presidential candidate and labor organizer who founded the Socialist Party of America.</span></strong>
</p>

<p>
	<strong><span style="color:#c0392b">Union Head Richard Trumka Sees AFL-CIO as Socialist Vehicle</span></strong>
</p>

<p>
	<strong><span style="color:#c0392b"><a href="https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/..." rel="external nofollow">https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/...</a></span></strong>
</p>

<p>
	<strong><span style="color:#c0392b">Jan 10, 2011 · Union Head Richard Trumka Sees AFL-CIO as Socialist Vehicle Though his manner of expression is reminiscent of Boston Mayor Thomas Menino's indefinite grammar, the stark meaning behind Trumka's...</span></strong>
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/930137</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/930137</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2020 14:49:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Fri, 10 Apr 2020 12:42:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	<a href="https://nypost.com/2020/04/10/democrats-want-to-drop-joe-biden-for-andrew-cuomo-poll-finds/" rel="external nofollow">https://nypost.com/2020/04/10/democrats-want-to-drop-joe-biden-for-andrew-cuomo-poll-finds/</a>
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/930129</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/930129</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Westside Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2020 12:42:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Thu, 02 Apr 2020 05:20:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/calfoxwc" aria-label="Profile: calfoxwc">@<bdi>calfoxwc</bdi></a> <a href="/post/928247">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			You fail to understand that I'm saying that some unions forgot their role, and became corrupt, greedy to the end, and self-justifying antagonistic towards Corp America in general. The AFL-CIO is a prime example. The Teamsters, at least back in the day, are another.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Yes, I did. Yes they did. Yes, they were. We're a lot more aligned than you might expect on Unions thru history.
</p>

<p>
	But you tend to talk like we are still is <span>"back in the day."... and we are not.</span>
</p>

<p>
	The Corporate America you appear to want to save from unions is far more dangerous to the individual than any union will ever be. If Corporations are people (and they are not), then by and large they are soulless folk.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/928261</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/928261</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tour2ma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2020 05:20:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Thu, 02 Apr 2020 02:56:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/tour2ma" aria-label="Profile: tour2ma">@<bdi>tour2ma</bdi></a> <a href="/post/928238">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			It was and yes, it is...
		</p>

		<p>
			Hope y'all keep underestimating, Joe as much as I did Trump... cost me a case of Christmas brew...
		</p>

		<p>
			Also never ceases to amaze me how a man of the people like cal fails to understand the role of unions.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	it wasn't, and no it isn't. I should bet everybody agin' Pres Trump winning again a six pack
</p>

<p>
	of Barq's root beer. I'll be happy happy happy. lol
</p>

<p>
	   You fail to understand that I'm saying that some unions forgot their role, and became corrupt, greedy to the end,
</p>

<p>
	and self-justifying antagonistic towards Corp America in general. The AFL-CIO is a prime example. The Teamsters, at least back in the day, are another.
</p>

<p>
	   Before you get all snidely whiplash, you should go read a book on the early coal miners plight. I explained that already.
</p>

<h2>
	<a href="https://www.amazon.com/Thunder-Mountains-West-Virginia-1920-21/dp/0822954265" rel="external nofollow">Thunder In the Mountains: The West Virginia <strong>Mine</strong> War, 1920 ...</a>
</h2>

<div>
	<div>
		<cite><a href="https://www" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www</a>.<strong>amazon</strong>.com/Thunder-Mountains-West...</cite>
	</div>

	<p>
		This book looks at the short conflict which took place in southwest West Virginia when violence escalated, first when private detectives in the pay of the coal companies got into a gunfight with locals in Matewan when the detectives came out to evict the families of miners trying to unionize. and then exploding when the local pro-labor constable, Sid Hatfield, was shot down on the steps of the courthouse in Welch by
	</p>
</div>

<h2>
	<a href="http://theconversation.com/the-rise-and-fall-of-us-labor-unions-and-why-they-still-matter-38263" rel="external nofollow">The rise and fall of US labor unions, and why they still ...</a>
</h2>

<div>
	<div>
		<cite>theconversation.com/...us-labor-<strong>unions</strong>-and-why-they...</cite>
	</div>

	<div>
		<div>
			<div>
				<div>
					<div>
						<ul><li>
								What Went Wrong?
							</li>
							<li>
								Why Does It Matter?
							</li>
							<li>
								What Now For Labor?
							</li>
						</ul></div>
				</div>

				<div>
					<div>
						<div>
							<div>
								<div>
									<span title="By the mid-1950s, unions in the US had successfully organized approximately one out of every three non-farm workers. This period represented the peak of labor’s power, as the ranks of unionized workers shrank in subsequent decades. The decline gained speed in the 1980s and 1990s, spurred by a combination of economic and political developments. The opening up of overseas markets increased competition in many highly organized industries. Outsourcing emerged as a popular practice among employers...">By the mid-1950s, <strong>unions in the US had successfully organized approximately one out of every three non-farm workers</strong>. This period <strong>represented the peak of labor’s power, as the ranks of unionized workers shrank in subsequent decades</strong>. The decline gained speed in the 1980s and 1990s, spurred by a combination of economic and political developments. The opening up of overseas markets increased competition in m…</span>
								</div>
							</div>
						</div>
					</div>
				</div>
			</div>
		</div>
	</div>
</div>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/928247</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/928247</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2020 02:56:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Thu, 02 Apr 2020 02:30:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/westside-steve" aria-label="Profile: westside-steve">@<bdi>westside-steve</bdi></a> <a href="/post/927469">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			For anyone who is considering voting against Trump and for the Democratic candidate do you think the Dems will actually scuttle the Biden nomination? Do you think it's wise? If I was a DNC advisor I might give that a 60/40 shot for success. A new candidate out of the blue would not have years of baggage and or the hint of dementia. Kind of like Obama.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	So Michelle? She's not interested.
</p>

<p>
	I'm not "considering", but I assumed a Bidden supporter qualifies... but seems the thread is over.
</p>

<p>
	Maybe next time...
</p>

<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/calfoxwc" aria-label="Profile: calfoxwc">@<bdi>calfoxwc</bdi></a> <a href="/post/927501">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			The real reasons why New Yorkers are fleeing the city
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Everyone knows that followed Mitch taking away the State tax deduction.
</p>

<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/calfoxwc" aria-label="Profile: calfoxwc">@<bdi>calfoxwc</bdi></a> <a href="/post/927710">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Woody - "two terrible candidates" isn't why Pres Trump won - it was time for the political pendulum to swing back.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	It was and yes, it is...
</p>

<p>
	Hope y'all keep underestimating, Joe as much as I did Trump... cost me a case of Christmas brew...
</p>

<p>
	Also never ceases to amaze me how a man of the people like cal fails to understand the role of unions.
</p>



<p>
	... but hey... at least it wasn't cal that brought up the "illegal iraq war."
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/928238</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/928238</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Tour2ma]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2020 02:30:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:39:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/westside-steve" aria-label="Profile: westside-steve">@<bdi>westside-steve</bdi></a> <a href="/post/927736">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			I understand that. Don't forget though but most of akron's Tire building facilities actually went to right to work states and not necessarily to China or Mexico. Plus I wonder how much the regulations have to do with the difference in cost to build something here or below the southern border? As opposed to actual hourly pay?
		</p>

		<p>
			WSS
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Rubber was already gone when Joe Biden gave his vote to end most of the rest of manufacturing in this country. We gave away national security so some CEOs could get out of paying fringe benefits and salary. Too bad we didn’t bring back some medical equipment manufacturing..... especially after the biological attacks(anthrax) shortly after 9/11.  Remember Joe and company’s idea to keep us safe? Duct tape and plastic.  Too bad we didn’t have a proper response plan then.  Nor do we now.  Thanks past elected leadership.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/927943</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/927943</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[flyingfooldoug]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2020 10:39:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Mon, 30 Mar 2020 13:28:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/westside-steve" aria-label="Profile: westside-steve">@<bdi>westside-steve</bdi></a> <a href="/post/927736">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			I understand that. Don't forget though but most of akron's Tire building facilities actually went to right to work states and not necessarily to China or Mexico. Plus I wonder how much the regulations have to do with the difference in cost to build something here or below the southern border? As opposed to actual hourly pay?
		</p>

		<p>
			WSS
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	part of what happened is unions with too much power, too much desire to go overboard, just because they could.
</p>

<p>
	In the early years of unions - it was an absolute desperate necessity. Fair, decent wages to live on, safe working conditions, fair labor practices... coal miners worked and died in dangerous conditions for pennies a day? Long hours, fired if the worker got sick for a while? etc etc.
</p>

<p>
	    But in later years, unions workers had really nice wages. And very safe working conditions, treated well, job security.
</p>

<p>
	But the unions kept getting more powerful, with more workers and more money from the required dues. In the later years, some unions were hell bent to demand raises for all that weren't fair, job security where a member could not be fired for anything... threats of a strike simply because they had pushed into arrogant and extreme greed levels. And some companies folded. Some moved plants away from the U.S.
</p>

<p>
	   Sure the companies that were crap hated the unions. Tennessee Ernie Ford even did the old famous song, "Sixteen Tons", about the pitiful existence working for the coal mines.
</p>

<p>
	  In the early days, I used to go on strike shifts with my Dad. Donuts, hamburgers, a bunch of really great guys with tremendous honor about themselves insisting a detrimental unfair change to their contract, not negotiating in good faith at all.
</p>

<p>
	  In later years, younger union members, and union leaders - would threaten a strike about the time a lot of them wanted to go on vacation without using their vacation time later. "haha". The big union leaders sometimes became very famous. and corrupt with power and wealth. And even when things were going awesome for the workers - leaving no legit demands unfulfilled ....
</p>

<p>
	unions kept coming up with hostile demands every so often. They had to justify their existence. Eventually, that started crashing plants' cost-effectiveness.
</p>

<p>
	   I saw this happen over the years. In the later years of my career, I subcontracted for the company my Dad retired from.
</p>

<p>
	My supervisor had been a staunch union guy for many years, until he saw the greed and the damage done. He told me a lot about it - admitted the union became a monster that destroyed the profit margins that started it's downfall.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/927741</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/927741</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2020 13:28:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:54:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/flyingfooldoug" aria-label="Profile: flyingfooldoug">@<bdi>flyingfooldoug</bdi></a> <a href="/post/927730">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Probably right but in Warren Ohio which saw 35,000 good paying jobs with good health care disappear in a few years, he’ll never be forgiven for his yes vote. FWIW, he voted for the illegal Iraq war too. Fuck him and his surrogate Timmy too
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	I understand that. Don't forget though but most of akron's Tire building facilities actually went to right to work states and not necessarily to China or Mexico. Plus I wonder how much the regulations have to do with the difference in cost to build something here or below the southern border? As opposed to actual hourly pay?
</p>

<p>
	WSS
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/927736</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/927736</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Westside Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:54:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:25:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/westside-steve" aria-label="Profile: westside-steve">@<bdi>westside-steve</bdi></a> <a href="/post/927718">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			I'm not sure that NAFTA will be a hot-button issue any more. I don't know if it's possible to bring back low income manufacturing jobs to the US anyway. At least free trade agreements to benefit the consumer even though it certainly doesn't make it easier to build things here.
		</p>

		<p>
			WSS
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Probably right but in Warren Ohio which saw 35,000 good paying jobs with good health care disappear in a few years, he’ll never be forgiven for his yes vote. FWIW, he voted for the illegal Iraq war too. Fuck him and his surrogate Timmy too
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/927730</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/927730</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[flyingfooldoug]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2020 12:25:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Mon, 30 Mar 2020 11:08:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	<a href="https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2020/03/29/joe_rogan_donald_trump_is_going_to_eat_joe_biden_alive.html" rel="external nofollow">https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2020/03/29/joe_rogan_donald_trump_is_going_to_eat_joe_biden_alive.html</a>
</p>

<p>
	Not that Rogan isn't an asshole but...
</p>

<p>
	WSS
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/927719</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/927719</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Westside Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2020 11:08:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:40:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/flyingfooldoug" aria-label="Profile: flyingfooldoug">@<bdi>flyingfooldoug</bdi></a> <a href="/post/927712">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Hi, I’m Joe Biden and I voted for NAFTA. 
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	I'm not sure that NAFTA will be a hot-button issue any more. I don't know if it's possible to bring back low income manufacturing jobs to the US anyway. At least free trade agreements to benefit the consumer even though it certainly doesn't make it easier to build things here.
</p>

<p>
	WSS
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/927718</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/927718</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Westside Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2020 10:40:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:27:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Hi, I’m Joe Biden and I voted for NAFTA. 
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/927712</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/927712</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[flyingfooldoug]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2020 09:27:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Mon, 30 Mar 2020 06:02:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/mld-woody" aria-label="Profile: mld-woody">@<bdi>mld-woody</bdi></a> <a href="/post/927548">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			I don't think anyone is confident behind Joe. Just making the point that, in national polls against Trump, he's still doing fine.
		</p>

		<p>
			and yes, right, any time there is any poll you don't like the answer will forever be "no that doesn't count because they said Trump would lose!"... 
		</p>

		<p>
			Trump, of course, was an incredibly unique situation at the time. Things that polling places weren't ready for
		</p>

		<p>
			When you have two terrible candidates going up against each other there is a lot of uncertainty. Though it is looking like we'll have two terrible candidates again
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Woody - "two terrible candidates" isn't why Pres Trump won - it was time for the political pendulum to swing back.
</p>

<p>
	Pres Trump came to the forefront because of that. It isn't that he is loved and admired and people think he's pretty.
</p>

<p>
	He isn't.
</p>

<p>
	What he is, is a man I didn't like earlier, who honestly said the things a lot of people believed about our government.
</p>

<p>
	Activist judges on the supreme court, all over the place. America first. Our Constitution. and he's kept so many promises already.
</p>

<p>
	Biden had eight years of being a no leader. he's a TERRIBLE candidate. Higgardly was completely corrupt and vicious  - a TERRIBLE candidate.
</p>

<p>
	  ObaMao was a terrific candidate - until it was clear he reversed who he was after getting elected - going way far left.
</p>

<p>
	Take George Washington - a terrific candidate - but most of his life he was not a man I would have admired at all. But there came a time later in his life, when he accrued great wisdom and strength - like Pres Trump. Not my cup of tea, I called him a circus barker earlier on.
</p>

<p>
	   Pres Trump is a badly needed candidate. Ben Franklin was an ornery but brilliant cad in his early years. But later in life, he became a great man, as did George Washington.
</p>

<p>
	   Pres Trump is not a great man - he's being a great president. Keeping his promises we need him to keep is part of the great job he has done. For all of his faults, he IS a leader.
</p>

<p>
	Pres Trump is hardly a terrible candidate, Woody. He won the first election. Biden won't win this one.
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/927710</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/927710</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[calfoxwc]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2020 06:02:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Sun, 29 Mar 2020 23:12:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/mld-woody" aria-label="Profile: mld-woody">@<bdi>mld-woody</bdi></a> <a href="/post/927548">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			I don't think anyone is confident behind Joe. Just making the point that, in national polls against Trump, he's still doing fine.
		</p>

		

		

		<p>
			and yes, right, any time there is any poll you don't like the answer will forever be "no that doesn't count because they said Trump would lose!"... 
		</p>

		<p>
			Trump, of course, was an incredibly unique situation at the time. Things that polling places weren't ready for
		</p>

		<p>
			When you have two terrible candidates going up against each other there is a lot of uncertainty. Though it is looking like we'll have two terrible candidates again
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	Fair enough. If you don't think the Democrats are disappointed in this clown then Rock on.
</p>

<p>
	WSS
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/927653</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/927653</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Westside Steve]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2020 23:12:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Joe on thin ice? on Sun, 29 Mar 2020 16:34:21 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/westside-steve" aria-label="Profile: westside-steve">@<bdi>westside-steve</bdi></a> <a href="/post/927518">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			Yes we know Woody. So you think the Democrats are pretty confident behind Joe?
		</p>

		<p>
			Two words: I'll give you a hint, the first one is Hillary.
		</p>

		<p>
			WSS
		</p>
	
</blockquote>

<p>
	I don't think anyone is confident behind Joe. Just making the point that, in national polls against Trump, he's still doing fine.
</p>



<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/calfoxwc" aria-label="Profile: calfoxwc">@<bdi>calfoxwc</bdi></a> <a href="/post/927517">said</a>:</p>
	

	
		<p>
			7 Reasons Why Hillary Clinton's Win Over Donald Trump Is a ...
		</p>

		<p>
			<a href="https://www.usnews.com/opinion/thomas-jefferson..." rel="external nofollow">https://www.usnews.com/opinion/thomas-jefferson...</a>
		</p>

		<p>
			Oct 28, 2016 · Done Deal Polls, early voting, money, ground game and more point to Hillary Clinton beating Donald Trump. By Robert Schlesinger Managing Editor for Opinion Oct. 28, 2016, at 1:15 p.m.
		</p>
	
</blockquote>



<p>
	and yes, right, any time there is any poll you don't like the answer will forever be "no that doesn't count because they said Trump would lose!"... 
</p>

<p>
	Trump, of course, was an incredibly unique situation at the time. Things that polling places weren't ready for
</p>

<p>
	When you have two terrible candidates going up against each other there is a lot of uncertainty. Though it is looking like we'll have two terrible candidates again
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/927548</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/927548</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MLD Woody]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2020 16:34:21 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>