@mjp28 said:

Really ?  A better source ?  

Sure why not?

@vambo said:

But I heard from a better source they were 99.9999999999999999999999999% NOT Russian bots.

Really ?  A better source ?  

@mjp28 said:

But I heard from a good source they were 95% Russian bots.

But I heard from a better source they were 99.9999999999999999999999999% NOT Russian bots.

@mjp28 said:

But I heard from a good source they were 95% Russian bots.

 are you saying that Woody's experts who believe it's nearly 50% are wrong?

He's not going to like that...

WSS

@vambo said:

Then again they MAY NOT be bots...see how that works! ?

But I heard from a good source they were 95% Russian bots.

or, just hypnotized to be an ignorant asswhole birdbrain.

@axe said:

Careful Steve, he'll get all butthurt and try to organize another boycott

LOL

@axe said:

Careful Steve, he'll get all butthurt and try to organize another boycott

No shit. I don't think these guys even care about the Russians I think it's just a talking point that they're forced to Yap about.

@mld-woody said:

Alright Steve. Fine. You have no answer, you've been backed into a corner, and you're hoping your previous post is forgotten. I have no idea why it's so hard for you to either back up your claim or just admit you were wrong. 

We'll end it here then. No point in you continuing to not answer me while attempting to insult me. 

Get the last word if you'd like

There wasn't a question so blow me. Even if there was I don't care about the Bots.

WSS

@westside-steve said:

Now you're wasting my time. Put your tinfoil hat back on and get under the bed. Here come the Bots.

WSS

Alright Steve. Fine. You have no answer, you've been backed into a corner, and you're hoping your previous post is forgotten. I have no idea why it's so hard for you to either back up your claim or just admit you were wrong. 

We'll end it here then. No point in you continuing to not answer me while attempting to insult me. 

Get the last word if you'd like

@mld-woody said:

Alright Steve, you've now attempted to fully shift and deflect this back and forth. Congrats.

I'll try one more time. You claimed CMU's study was completely inaccurate. Why? What evidence do you have to think that's the case? Can you back that comment up at all?

Now you're wasting my time. Put your tinfoil hat back on and get under the bed. Here come the Bots.

WSS

@westside-steve said:

Just responding to your ridiculous whining. The only deflection is you bellyaching about Russians and Bots. Honest to God if you think we're committing suicide by going back to business as usual move to California or Pennsylvania. I don't know what else to tell you.

WSS

Alright Steve, you've now attempted to fully shift and deflect this back and forth. Congrats.

I'll try one more time. You claimed CMU's study was completely inaccurate. Why? What evidence do you have to think that's the case? Can you back that comment up at all?

@mld-woody said:

You don't need to get all pissy because you made a claim you couldn't back up. Just don't make the claim next time or follow up with saying you don't have any evidence to back up your claim. You don't need to try and deflect and then dig your hole deeper with "fake science" nonsense. 

Just responding to your ridiculous whining. The only deflection is you bellyaching about Russians and Bots. Honest to God if you think we're committing suicide by going back to business as usual move to California or Pennsylvania. I don't know what else to tell you.

WSS

@warriorsrpussies said:

Wouldn't surprise me the least bit. How may of those IPs you think originate from Russia or China? Add in the GOP paid shills it's a bunch for sure.

Who, exactly, is paying these shills? It never hurts to have a second income. 

Is it the joker? Do you suppose the joker is behind it?

@westside-steve said:

Don't care. Don't care at all. Don't give a shit about Twitter nor people who do. (or Q or 4Chan BTW) basis of the entire conversation is whining about who's making the Twitter posts about reopening the country which has been based on fake science. 

No more no less. You can cry about directions and the Bots as much as you want. Swamp draining thread would be a good place for you.

WSS

You don't need to get all pissy because you made a claim you couldn't back up. Just don't make the claim next time or follow up with saying you don't have any evidence to back up your claim. You don't need to try and deflect and then dig your hole deeper with "fake science" nonsense. 

WSS

@mld-woody said:

Yep, and here you go, steering the whole thing off course. How damn predictable...

If you want to tell me why the CMU study is l inaccurate, lmk. You've made a claim and have yet to back it up. I'll wait for that instead of following your deflection

Don't care. Don't care at all. Don't give a shit about Twitter nor people who do. (or Q or 4Chan BTW) basis of the entire conversation is whining about who's making the Twitter posts about reopening the country which has been based on fake science. 

No more no less. You can cry about directions and the Bots as much as you want. Swamp draining thread would be a good place for you.

WSS

@westside-steve said:

Yes ass wipe COVID models are way off there's only about a million hits when you do a Google search. The exact fucking models that people are using to determine the reopening of America. Those models.

What models are you talking about that have been so accurate?

Model cars? Supermodels? Model airplanes?

And they deserve to be discredited.

WSS

Yep, and here you go, steering the whole thing off course. How damn predictable...

If you want to tell me why the CMU study is l inaccurate, lmk. You've made a claim and have yet to back it up. I'll wait for that instead of following your deflection

@calfoxwc said:

Abortion isn't a political war, it's a personal decision and cultural issue.  An intensely personal conflict and/or decision.

bs. here is what you said above. you defended abortion as not being the murder of born and unborn children, you said it was personal decision/conflict. You brought it up as a "back at ya".

Here is what you said below:

@calfoxwc said:

 If a woman chooses to not reproduce, then that consequence is limited to the confines of her body and mind.   

no, Tiam, the consequences are murder of a born/unborn CHILD.

btw, do the forum a favor and don't bring up slavery to diss our country's Founding Fathers and our country's beginnings.

Slavery was very bad. Everybody gets it. It doesn't make your point at all.

@westside-steve said:

 Spare me. I know you're not stupid you just pretend to be so on the board.  here's just one, the first one that popped up

.

https://www.cato.org/blog/how-one-model-simulated-22-million-us-deaths-covid-19

WSS

Don't sell him short he's been working so hard at it.

@mld-woody said:

...so... Are you not going to answer the question?

I'll assume you read the link you posted. It doesn't support your claim at all, FYI. If you're trying to use this as a "see! we can't trust these stupid academics at all!" well that just doesn't work. Not only is the CMU study not a model, but even the model explained why their numbers were so high (in a continuingly evolving situation)

So, instead of you now attempting to change the subject to COVID models as I know you are attempting to do, please explain why the CMU study is inaccurate

Yes ass wipe COVID models are way off there's only about a million hits when you do a Google search. The exact fucking models that people are using to determine the reopening of America. Those models.

What models are you talking about that have been so accurate?

Model cars? Supermodels? Model airplanes?

And they deserve to be discredited.

WSS

@westside-steve said:

 Spare me. I know you're not stupid you just pretend to be so on the board.  here's just one, the first one that popped up

.

https://www.cato.org/blog/how-one-model-simulated-22-million-us-deaths-covid-19

WSS

...so... Are you not going to answer the question?

I'll assume you read the link you posted. It doesn't support your claim at all, FYI. If you're trying to use this as a "see! we can't trust these stupid academics at all!" well that just doesn't work. Not only is the CMU study not a model, but even the model explained why their numbers were so high (in a continuingly evolving situation)

So, instead of you now attempting to change the subject to COVID models as I know you are attempting to do, please explain why the CMU study is inaccurate

Not to mention you link is from the Cato Institute, a right wing think tank. Now, nothing seems obvious false in their report, you just have to get how models and the one in question work. Though they did refer to some studies that have since been questioned pretty heavily.