@typicalbrowns50 said:

LOL

scheming to protect Burrow isn’t good coaching your right.

Maybe not be so damn opened ended with your posts while leading off with how the praise on Burrow isn't warranted and you wouldn't be so misunderstood.  

@typicalbrowns50 said:

Tiamat is a badass look out.

THAT'S Mister Badass to you...

scheming to protect Burrow isn’t good coaching your right.

@typicalbrowns50 said:

LOL Tiamat is a badass look out.

Of course it’s good coaching like I said in my post. Jeeeez ppl are all Lombardi on here.

Only, that's isn't what you said in your post.   You said "they're scheming to protect Burrow".  

Which would probably make his night a bit more impressive given the lack of vertical options he had to deal with.

@tiamat63 said:

Brilliant analysis.   So an offense that has issues struggling to pass block is highlighting their rookie QB's strength, his short and intermediate accuracy, by trying to get the ball out quick.  Plus side, saving the wear and tear on his body so he doesn't end up like Couch.

That's called good coaching.  

LOL Tiamat is a badass look out.

Of course it’s good coaching like I said in my post. Jeeeez ppl are all Lombardi on here.

@tiamat63 said:

Getting Mixon going might be difficult with that Oline.

Ding Ding Ding...

The "fat-asses" have to perform... and Cinci is just not good there. I'd be surprised if anyone outside of a 150 mile radius from Cinci came name a starter.

Meanwhile Andrew Whitworth just keeps rolling along at a high level for LAR.

@sdbacker80 said:

I think there is a little more coming.  

They need get Mixon going doesn’t have to necessarily be conventional runs either and slowly work on loosening up Def going downfield.  I think they will and they are going to be a tougher out next time.

But we better lineup and just run over them (40-45 carries) keep Burrow on the sideline next game 

Getting Mixon going might be difficult with that Oline.  You can scheme up whatever, but if you don't have the talent to execute those designs then it becomes a moot point. 

Agreed on the next meeting.  They have some boys up front though - Reader especially.  But without Geno and now a little older Dunlap, they don't have as much bite up front.

@tiamat63 said:

He's 0-2, the first loss being a heartbreak missed FG and the other watching his defense unable to stop a 2 back rotation all while seeing Myles align across from him.  

Aside from being blasted into a concussion, pretty sure the kid has already had his "welcome" moment.

I think there is a little more coming.  

They need get Mixon going doesn’t have to necessarily be conventional runs either and slowly work on loosening up Def going downfield.  I think they will and they are going to be a tougher out next time.

But we better lineup and just run over them (40-45 carries) keep Burrow on the sideline next game 

@sdbacker80 said:

Ravens and Steelers come to mind.  Joe will have his welcome to League moment soon. 

He's 0-2, the first loss being a heartbreak missed FG and the other watching his defense unable to stop a 2 back rotation all while seeing Myles align across from him.  

Aside from being blasted into a concussion, pretty sure the kid has already had his "welcome" moment.

If they can’t complete passes downfield Def. Coordinators are going to play press and send the blitz and the Bengals haven’t shown much of run game either. He looked a look skittish a times (feet were off) when we sent extra men 

Ravens and Steelers come to mind. They will come after Joe hard and sit on those short And intermediate routes  Joe will have his welcome to League moment soon. 

@tiamat63 said:

Brilliant analysis.   So an offense that has issues struggling to pass block is highlighting their rookie QB's strength, his short and intermediate accuracy, by trying to get the ball out quick.  Plus side, saving the wear and tear on his body so he doesn't end up like Couch.

That's called good coaching.  

yep.

@tiamat63 said:

Brilliant analysis.   So an offense that has issues struggling to pass block is highlighting their rookie QB's strength, his short and intermediate accuracy, by trying to get the ball out quick.  Plus side, saving the wear and tear on his body so he doesn't end up like Couch.

That's called good coaching.  

That is the Cincinnati franchise out there they better do whatever it takes to protect him.

Same with Mayfield and now they have the 1-2 punch at running back to do just that.  Look for Baker to have the pass option less passes and more ypc to help him out.

GO BROWNS, high power offence and pray for the defence.......baby !

@typicalbrowns50 said:

So we’re all clear here, the dick sucking of Burrow I think is a little much. 
 

be threw 61 times, and only had 80 more yards than Baker, who threw 23 times...

bengals are obviously scheming to protect Burrow. 

Brilliant analysis.   So an offense that has issues struggling to pass block is highlighting their rookie QB's strength, his short and intermediate accuracy, by trying to get the ball out quick.  Plus side, saving the wear and tear on his body so he doesn't end up like Couch.

That's called good coaching.  

be threw 61 times, and only had 80 more yards than Baker, who threw 23 times...

bengals are obviously scheming to protect Burrow. 

@texasag1969 said:

I thought offence was Gipper's specialty under the law.??

If by that you mean that I put people in jail for or hand out fines for committing offences then yes it is. 

@texasag1969 said:

I thought offence was Gipper's specialty under the law.??

LOL LOL

@texasag1969 said:

I thought offence was Gipper's specialty under the law.??

You mean Your Honor Gipper ?   

@mjp28 said:

Im thinking that the offence may improve as the season goes on

I thought offence was Gipper's specialty under the law.??

@texasag1969 said:

I'm going to rewatch the game and concentrate on his play every offensive down just to see what we have now.

Im thinking that the offence may improve as the season goes on and run game might get more in the groove.  Remember too they played woeful Cincinnati in the last game and gave up 30+ points and went 0-5 in forth down stops, a few more stops they could have had had the run game on the field more and probably scored more points.

Same somewhat with the defense as it goes on.

@sdbacker80 said:

We ran behind Jed Wills ALOT and he looked good and I can’t remember him giving up a sack/pressure etc

I'm going to rewatch the game and concentrate on his play every offensive down just to see what we have now.

@gumby73 said:

I get your frustrations ?..I seriously do..I find myself continually bitching at Sendejo/T.Thomas/M.Smith/Goodson & T.Mitch sometimes....But! Sendejo lead us in tackles last night.. Well..and,  I keep telling 'self.. I'd rather see Malcolm Smith than TikiTaki"... Joseph is really peeking a nerve also.. am headed over to our ST issues?, but heck, at least Phefer is trying EVERY-body in the pool! 

Sendejo led the team in tackles because the Bengals threw the ball 60 times down field. Who the hell else was going to do the tackling? The middle guard?

I would have listed Harrison Bryant as a stock up - one play, he showed what he is capable of - just wait til he gets some more experience under his belt and gets a few more chances.

STOCK UP - Hooper, Ward, Stefanski, Baker, Richardson.

STOCK DOWN - those who covet drama from Baker and OBJ....special teams....and good ole #23, Sendejo.

https://brownswire.usatoday.com/lists/browns-stock-report-who-rose-up-and-who-fell-down-in-clevelands-week-2-win-over-the-bengals/

@tour2ma said:

Our "Defense" or our defensive personnel?

That's a good question and I'm not sure I actually know the answer. Let's see how we look with Johnson, Greedy, and Mack back.