<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The lefties with rotten egg on their faces - PEER REVIEWED STUDY -]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	too bad, Hoorta, his little woodpecker, and Tex won't like the truth, but it would set them free if
</p>

<p>
	they could just slow down with the contrariness and belligerent trolling crap.
</p>

<p>
	<a href="https://www.theblaze.com/news/peer-reviewed-hydroxychloroquine-study-hospitalizations" rel="external nofollow">https://www.theblaze.com/news/peer-reviewed-hydroxychloroquine-study-hospitalizations</a>
</p>

<div>
	<h1>
		Peer-reviewed hydroxychloroquine study finds 84% fewer hospitalizations among early treated outpatients
	</h1>
</div>

<div>
	<p>
		'What differentiates this study is that patients were diagnosed very early with COVID-19 in an outpatient setting, and only high-risk patients were treated early on
	</p>
</div>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/59251/the-lefties-with-rotten-egg-on-their-faces-peer-reviewed-study</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 05:52:37 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/59251.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 00:55:53 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to The lefties with rotten egg on their faces - PEER REVIEWED STUDY - on Wed, 25 Nov 2020 04:21:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>
	Dr Zelenko again?
</p>

<p>
	His stuff got shot down literally months ago.
</p>

<p>
	He also claimed, months ago, to have treated over 300 patients with hydroxy. This study only refers to 141 being treated. 
</p>







<p>
	<span style="color:#2e2e2e">Inherent to all retrospective analyses, our study has certain limitations, such as non-randomisation and blinding of treatment. Also, only the outcome data of the untreated control group based on the public reference were available; because no other data on patient characteristics or clinical symptoms were available, no risk adjustment was possible. Therefore, confounding factors and selection bias, among other issues, might exist. The demographic composition of the treatment group might also have had an influence on our findings. Because many physician appointments had to be managed by telehealth, vital parameters were not available for the majority of patients.</span>
</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/972034</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/972034</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[MLD Woody]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 04:21:05 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>