@tour2ma said:

Gotta love a judge who won't give legal advice, but will post about what he wants from whores...

Well.....I get paid for one.....but don't for the other.  

You should be able to relate.  As a whore yourself, you wouldn't give it away for free.....but you give you often completely bogus opinions on matters you are not a professional at. 

In fact, with a whore, since you have to pay....you should get what you want.   Fair to say? 

@icecube said:

What are you talking about? He never did such before. The O is worse with him, the #s prove it. 

So you skipped Ibleedbrowns' post?

@nickers said:

 I want his talent with out the attention whore antics...

Definitely has been an issue in his past, but I must have blinked and missed them this season. So you will have to refresh my memory.

The guy just wants to be a part of a winning team. I can handle that.

@icecube said:

What are you talking about? He never did such before. The O is worse with him, the #s prove it. 

Exactly right...

@lbc-mike said:

having him in the field with the others makes hunt and chub lethal.

What are you talking about? He never did such before. The O is worse with him, the #s prove it. 

Of course you want OBJ on the Browns at the same time the Cavs feature a duo named Sexland.  Don't deny it.

@ibleedbrown said:

For shits and giggles l ran some numbers on Browns rushing stats this year with OBJ, and without OBJ. The theory here is that OBJ “stretches the field” and loosens up the run game.

I counted the second Bengals game in the “without OBJ” column since he went down really early. Here’s what l came up with.

With OBJ: 6 games/ 194 rushing attempts/ 1,017 yards/ 32.3 attempts per game/ 5.24 yards per carry

Without OBJ: 9 games/ 270 rushing attempts/ 1,165 yards/ 30 attempts per game/ 4.31 yards per carry

The most significant of those numbers is we were gaining almost and entire extra yard per carry with OBJ in there. In a game of inches, that’s like 33 of them. 

The attempts columns were similar. We tried carrying it a little over 2 more times on average per game with OBJ as opposed to without. 
 

I realize there’s other factors at play, but that’s at least some indication that having OBJ, or a guy like him, is good for the team.

Thanks for the research. I've been saying all along that the run game has suffered since OBJ went down without doing the research. People would tell me BS but its obvious to me. I believe the offense was still trying to find their way early on. It appears now they are finding their way and OBJ with compliment it when he returns. 

@texasag1969 said:

Did you hear about the Aggie who spent $200 to stay overnight in a Warehouse in La Grange? He had heard on the ZZ Top song of that title that "They gotta lotta nice girls down there".??

No.

@the-gipper said:

I can see that.  I want whores who give attention, not ones who demand it.  

Did you hear about the Aggie who spent $200 to stay overnight in a Warehouse in La Grange? He had heard on the ZZ Top song of that title that "They gotta lotta nice girls down there".??

@the-gipper said:

I can see that.  I want whores who give attention, not ones who demand it.  

Amen to that...

@nickers said:

 I want his talent with out the attention whore antics...

I can see that.  I want whores who give attention, not ones who demand it.  

@nickers said:

Now now , RuPaul... Don't over exert yourself LOL

I never do Beevis. 

@ibleedbrown said:

For shits and giggles l ran some numbers on Browns rushing stats this year with OBJ, and without OBJ. The theory here is that OBJ “stretches the field” and loosens up the run game.

I counted the second Bengals game in the “without OBJ” column since he went down really early. Here’s what l came up with.

With OBJ: 6 games/ 194 rushing attempts/ 1,017 yards/ 32.3 attempts per game/ 5.24 yards per carry

Without OBJ: 9 games/ 270 rushing attempts/ 1,165 yards/ 30 attempts per game/ 4.31 yards per carry

The most significant of those numbers is we were gaining almost and entire extra yard per carry with OBJ in there. In a game of inches, that’s like 33 of them. 

The attempts columns were similar. We tried carrying it a little over 2 more times on average per game with OBJ as opposed to without. 
 

I realize there’s other factors at play, but that’s at least some indication that having OBJ, or a guy like him, is good for the team.

 I want his talent with out the attention whore antics...

@the-gipper said:

I always am, Gomer.

Now now , RuPaul... Don't over exert yourself LOL

I counted the second Bengals game in the “without OBJ” column since he went down really early. Here’s what l came up with.

With OBJ: 6 games/ 194 rushing attempts/ 1,017 yards/ 32.3 attempts per game/ 5.24 yards per carry

Without OBJ: 9 games/ 270 rushing attempts/ 1,165 yards/ 30 attempts per game/ 4.31 yards per carry

The most significant of those numbers is we were gaining almost and entire extra yard per carry with OBJ in there. In a game of inches, that’s like 33 of them. 

The attempts columns were similar. We tried carrying it a little over 2 more times on average per game with OBJ as opposed to without. 
 

I realize there’s other factors at play, but that’s at least some indication that having OBJ, or a guy like him, is good for the team.

@nickers said:

Relax , Karen!

I always am, Gomer.

@the-gipper said:

Or not,  Alicia. 

Relax , Karen!

@nickers said:

Having him on the field will force Baker BACK into bad habits...

FIFY?

@nickers said:

Having him on the field will force Baker into bad habits...

Or not,  Alicia. 

@lbc-mike said:

having him in the field with the others makes hunt and chub lethal.

Having him on the field will force Baker into bad habits...

@nickers said:

Fuck Odell.. We don't need him...

having him in the field with the others makes hunt and chub lethal.