Dawgfanforever88 said:

Yeah, but I remember Eric Wedge telling Lanigan that it didn't mean squat the Indians came out of spring training in last place, a number of months back. There wasn't nearly enough change; we didn't score a damn point. Not even a damn field goal. How long is it now since an offensive touchdown?

@dawgpound3 said:

Positives

We held the team to 17 points

You do know they took a knee at the 2 yard line to run out the clock. Right? Had they chose, they could have run three or four plays from there (although it would have only taken one).

The point is,Mngini is no coach.His off. co-ordinator is un-imaginative.too many mistakes by too many players.There was no coaching.No one on the Browns played with any desire or heart.It was awful.Jamal Lewis is done.

Finally,they need to quit wearing those seal Brown pantsThey look like Euclid Ave. hookers at 3AM.

@thebestplayersplay said:

J. Davis looked good

Veikune looked good, relentless

Alex Hall looked good, explosive

Bowens looked good

Rubin looked good

BQ looked good

Furrey looked very good, exactly what BQ needs to sustain drives

Francies looks like a keeper

Titus Brown also looking good

E Wright not bad

Cribbs looks like a threat, needs ball more

In summary, not all is doom and gloom. I personally am excited to see the team progress through the preseason ....and surprise everyone come the regular seaon. Scoreboard doesn't mean a lick in preseason imo.

@thebestplayersplay said:

J. Davis looked good

Veikune looked good, relentless

Alex Hall looked good, explosive

Bowens looked good

Rubin looked good

BQ looked good

Furrey looked very good, exactly what BQ needs to sustain drives

Francies looks like a keeper

Titus Brown also looking good

E Wright not bad Sucked, you cannot tackle from your knees or you loose all your strength to bring anyone down.

Cribbs looks like a threat, needs ball more Is only a threat if you line him up at HB, among KR

Dawson ? how do you miss on a 41 yard field goal attempt?

In summary, not all is doom and gloom. I personally am excited to see the team progress through the preseason ....and surprise everyone come the regular seaon. Scoreboard doesn't mean a lick in preseason imo. I agree

I added my thoughts in color

@thebestplayersplay said:

He got beat twice in blitz pickup, allowing Will Blackmon to strip the ball and Desmond Bishop to come in & sack Ratliff. He almost did something on that screen play, but he only ended up getting six yards.

Overall, it wasn't a great day for Davis.

Bowens looked good

I think you mean Mosley, who was phenomenal. Bowens didn't play.

Titus Brown also looking good

To be honest, I wasn't impressed with anything he did tonight. Marcus Benard had a much better game.

@gips said:

Hood didnt look so bad either...

On the play in which DB Brandon Anderson hit Matt Flynn, receiver Ruvell Martin beat Hood badly with a double move. Were it not for the QB hit, Martin would have scored a touchdown.

That, to me, was a sign that Hood shouldn't be playing outside. He's more a nickel corner, and I think that showed tonight.

DA threw only 2 passes. One probably should have been picked and the other was.

BQ played very well except for one pass that got picked in the endzone.

Either one of these guys would have higher QB ratings over a full game, unless you assume that DA is gonna throw a pick every pass attempt, or that BQ is gonna get picked on every trip in the red zone.

They each had only 2 series, so with such a limited sample size that makes the QBR statistic highly volatile as a gauge of actual performance.

The more telling thing is that the team drove the field with one QB, but couldn't even manage a flippin' 1st down with the other.

We traded a 1st round pick for 0 TD's?

Hell I'd rather go back in time for the 1st round pick we were offered and play the season with DA.

0 TD's and 4 INT's?

Yeah I am really happy we chose - AGAIN - a first time OC.

Dawgfanforever88 said:

he man has an excellent point.

neither one was smart tho, and BQ shoulda put it in, and would have if that wasn't edwards at WR. robo woulda caught that no problem.

@alendor said:

i would have to disagree with you on this and say that it was more costly than the da int because it did cost a td or even 3 points

Obviously BQ looked the best of the 3 QBs and I would say that DA must had looked the worst. I am just saying that no Qb with a 43 rating could have looked that good, except that you are comparing him to a QB with a 0.0 rating.

@cmac12 said:

Now 43 is allot better than 0.0. So I would not say BQ looked good, I would say he looked less terrible than DA.

for someone who admits to not seeing the game, I dunno if your qualified to say who looked good or bad. if you watched the game you would have known, regardless of numbers that BQ looked good, in command, and poised. where DA looked like a deer in the headlights.

@why-cant-we-win said:

did you even read what I said?

Dawgfanforever88 said:

so wat are we going to be the first team to go 0-20 haha hopefully not

Now 43 is allot better than 0.0. So I would not say BQ looked good, I would say he looked less terrible than DA.

@restinpeace said:

If Brady turns out better than I think, everything speeds up a year.

Dude seriously are you even a fan?