<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Offensive Output]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>After 2 pre-season games, I have to say that the first team offense is looking pretty darn good, no matter who is at QB.  Just look at the drives early in both games for examples:</p>

<p>
Game 1:</p>
<p>
BQ drives the offense 66 yards for a missed FG</p>
<p>
BQ drives the offense 49 yards and is a dropped pass away from a TD</p>

<p>
Game 2: </p>
<p>
DA drives the offense 74 yards for a TD</p>
<p>
DA drives the offense 56 yards for a FG</p>

<p>
Although the Browns missed the FG and BE dropped that pass in the endzone, the offense had at least 2 good drives in the half that they played.  It also seems that whichever QB was prepared to start is the one that is moving the team.</p>

<p>
At this point, I can't say I can see an edge for either QB....but I can definitely see a HUGE difference in the way the offense is moving the ball this year.</p>

<p>
(one thing to remember, the Browns were playing with a 3rd or 4th string QB during all but one of our TD-less games last year...how man teams do you know that would do much better with a 3rd or 4th stringer in there?  We were 4-6 when we lost our top 2 QB's...so we weren't as bad as we looked then either.)</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/6133/offensive-output</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 18:36:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/6133.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:49:23 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>