@neo said:

Honest question. So you believe Rittenhouse was NOT GUILTY of killing Rosenbaum? I know the jury did, but do you think he was not guilty?

He obviously killed him. That's a dumb question.  Do I think it constituted murder? 

No. That was as clear a case of self defense as has ever been brought before the judicial system. 

@neo said:

Offened? I'm not offended. I'm just wondering why when I ask an innocent question to a specific person, I'm getting responses from people that it was not addressed to before I actually get a response from the person I asked the question.

What does it matter WHAT I have to say??‍️

 Doesn't really actually matter what anybody has to say does it? I guess I was mistaken and thinking you actually wanted to have a conversation about that; my bad.

WSS 

@westside-steve said:

 I'm not quite sure what offended you about my asking for a clarification.  Thought it was a reasonable question why didn't you?  Also you're whining about board policy and I don't see the point in that.

WSS 

Offened? I'm not offended. I'm just wondering why when I ask an innocent question to a specific person, I'm getting responses from people that it was not addressed to before I actually get a response from the person I asked the question.

@westside-steve said:

asking for a clarification.

What does it matter WHAT I have to say??‍️

@neo said:

All I did was ask a simple yes or no question to another member, why are you coming at me with questions?

And I got this in response ?

So what is asking questions against board policy now? In response to this ?

Just curious what the exact charge would be. Killing isn't really a charge.. Involuntary and manslaughter? Of course if it's self defense it wouldn't be that either.

WSS 

 I'm not quite sure what offended you about my asking for a clarification.  Thought it was a reasonable question why didn't you?  Also you're whining about board policy and I don't see the point in that.

WSS 

@neo said:

Honest question. So you believe Rittenhouse was NOT GUILTY of killing Rosenbaum? I know the jury did, but do you think he was not guilty?

All I did was ask a simple yes or no question to another member, why are you coming at me with questions?

And I got this in response ?

@axe said:

Thought you experienced an epiphany and stepped away from this cupcake?  ?

So what is asking questions against board policy now? In response to this ?

Just curious what the exact charge would be. Killing isn't really a charge.. Involuntary and manslaughter? Of course if it's self defense it wouldn't be that either.

WSS 

@neo said:

Honest question. So you believe Rittenhouse was NOT GUILTY of killing Rosenbaum? I know the jury did, but do you think he was not guilty?

 Just curious what the exact charge would be. Killing isn't really a charge.. Involuntary and manslaughter? Of course if it's self defense it wouldn't be that either.

WSS 

@axe said:

I'm sorry that your mom is also your sister and your dad is also your uncle.

Seriously, didn't you step away?

simple fucking question ?

You have no basic reading or comprehension skills. So who is the inbred one? Now fuck off you trailer trash piece of shit.

@neo said:

See, this is the problem. This place is overrun by inbred hillbillies that can't even answer a simple fucking question???? So fucking typical. 

I'm sorry that your mom is also your sister and your dad is also your uncle.

Seriously, didn't you step away?

simple fucking question ?

@axe said:

Thought you experienced an epiphany and stepped away from this cupcake?  ?

What he can't speak for himself? What, do you wipe his ass to? Go away softie.

@neo said:

Honest question. So you believe Rittenhouse was NOT GUILTY of killing Rosenbaum? I know the jury did, but do you think he was not guilty?

Thought you experienced an epiphany and stepped away from this cupcake?  ?

@the-cysko-kid said:

Here's a piece of information thats not common knowledge. Rosenbaum was released that morning from a mental hospital where he had been following his second suicide attempt in two months and an attack on his girlfriend. The bag he threw literally had the few items he was booted out of the mental hospital with. He wasn't there because he gave a fuck about BLM or anything like that. He was there because he had nowhere to go. 

Now back in the olden days before the left believed every police involved shooting was cold blooded murder there used to be something called suicide by cop and I believe that's what Rosenbaum did here: forced someone else to do what he wanted to do to himself. Rittenhouse was not the first armed person he attempted to bait that day. 

If not for his actions that Huber fellow would likely still be alive. 

Honest question. So you believe Rittenhouse was NOT GUILTY of killing Rosenbaum? I know the jury did, but do you think he was not guilty?

Now back in the olden days before the left believed every police involved shooting was cold blooded murder there used to be something called suicide by cop and I believe that's what Rosenbaum did here: forced someone else to do what he wanted to do to himself. Rittenhouse was not the first armed person he attempted to bait that day. 

If not for his actions that Huber fellow would likely still be alive. 

Babylonbee.com 

Haha...

@westside-steve said:

Woody  did I fuck up and edit rather  than quote again? I'm  sorry. 

WSS 

You gotta work on that haha

@mld-woody said:

And Hogg wasnt attacked? Hell, you went after him multiple times a day. 

When you put the word  "attacked" in its proper context, no he wasn't.

Who are we on this board other than common people who's opinion caries no weight?

The term "attack"  is associated with the actions of the mainstream media, academia, politicians, and celebrities toward Rittenhouse, and any other right winger in the public eye or in the news. Nick Sandman was another example.

Not a peep out of these elitists when it came to Hogg or that other little bitch.

I know Steve is a popular musician, but c'mon man. lol

WSS 

@mld-woody said:

Hell, a lot of places are moving away from standardized testing scores as it is. 

No wonder the Chinese are kicking our ass.

@westside-steve said:

 I just saw him as a smart  and self important kid who decided to latch onto a horrible situation for fun profit profit and fame. Looking for money money and maybe a foot in the door, an audition, for a national media media spot.  The MSM was literally fawning over the little bastard.  Did you buy a set of his pillows?  Did he get into Harvard with a 1270 SAT?

  https://www.apbspeakers.com/speaker/david-hogg/

 And you're right hogg was more prepared that's the whole reason for his activism.  It's surely not uncommon for someone to plan out a path to success glawning onto unfortunate situations. Rittenhouse, on the other hand was attacked regularly  and quite unfairlyby the MSM  and your presidential candidate.

WSS 

And Hogg wasnt attacked? Hell, you went after him multiple times a day. 

 Not as bad as some but sure I thought he was an asshole and I didn't like  his his left wing political crusades. We probably disagree on that .  Of course if you think the disrespect for the Hugg man was = the disrespect by  the mainstream media toward Rittenhouse you're nuts  or being purposely untruthful.  In many ways and many circumstances that's your Mo equating statements by the president of the United States and the liberal press to statements by Cal on the board.

The "whole reason for his activism" might have had something to do with, idk, that school shooting he survived...

 Was he there when it happened? I honestly forget. Not that it matters. Well much.

Applications aren't based solely on grades, FYI. I mean, it's kind of weird you brought it up and care, but considering everything else he did, I'm sure those positive portions of his resume outweighed the negatives. Hell, a lot of places are moving away from standardized testing scores as it is. 

Indeed there are. Achievement standards take a back seat to social engineering more and more. I would imagine soon enough U of M Harvard Juliard et cetera will be offering participation  degrees.

WSS

@vambo said:

this sentiment is simple so as not to have to explain these two when they were foisted into the spotlight by the same propaganda masters

@mld-woody said:

No, I found it very strange you held some vendetta against a high schooler and I was calling you out on it. 

Hogg sought out attention and utilized the "platform" he was given. Rittenhouse fell into his. It would make sense Hogg was more prepared. 

 I just saw him as a smart  and self important kid who decided to latch onto a horrible situation for fun profit profit and fame. Looking for money money and maybe a foot in the door, an audition, for a national media media spot.  The MSM was literally fawning over the little bastard.  Did you buy a set of his pillows?  Did he get into Harvard with a 1270 SAT?

  https://www.apbspeakers.com/speaker/david-hogg/

 And you're right hogg was more prepared that's the whole reason for his activism.  It's surely not uncommon for someone to plan out a path to success glawning onto unfortunate situations. Rittenhouse, on the other hand was attacked regularly  and quite unfairlyby the MSM  and your presidential candidate.

WSS 

@mld-woody said:

No, I found it very strange you held some vendetta against a high schooler and I was calling you out on it. 

Hogg sought out attention and utilized the "platform" he was given. Rittenhouse fell into his. It would make sense Hogg was more prepared.