@cccjwh said:

It's in the link.

Global Warming (nasa.gov)

Keep in mind any global data over 150 years ago is an estimate, a reconstruction of 2nd hand evidence.

@canton-dawg said:

Cool story….now compare those temperatures to the temps from the 1500’s.

It's in the link.

Global Warming (nasa.gov)

@canton-dawg said:

Or Dr Dre.

Him and his heffa be gettin jiggy wit it on da sofa... y don't U ax'em

@nickers said:

Don't forget Dr.Doo-Little either!

Or Dr Dre.

@canton-dawg said:

Doctors and scientists…like Dr Fauci? 

Don't forget Dr.Doo-Little either!

@mld-woody said:

See, but they don't trust scientists, experts, academics, book learnin, etc

Doctors and scientists…like Dr Fauci? 

@cccjwh said:

Climate Cartoon Goes Viral, But Scientists Have One Concern : Goats and Soda : NPR

There you go.

Here's How Scientists Reconstruct Earth's Past Climates | Smithsonian Voices | National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Magazine

See, but they don't trust scientists, experts, academics, book learnin, etc

It's a great out to just shout "liberal bias!" whenever they see scientific info they disagree with (from very reputable sources). It allows them to not actually have to think at all. 

how about this: ....it's just another ploy to emotionally manipulate a lot of people towards their ulterior motives.

notice the period.

@cccjwh said:

Climate Cartoon Goes Viral, But Scientists Have One Concern : Goats and Soda : NPR

There you go.

Here's How Scientists Reconstruct Earth's Past Climates | Smithsonian Voices | National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Magazine

Cool story….now compare those temperatures to the temps from the 1500’s.

@canton-dawg said:

Great!

We have satellite estimated temperature readings!

Now do the 1500’s and let’s compare.

Climate Cartoon Goes Viral, But Scientists Have One Concern : Goats and Soda : NPR

There you go.

Here's How Scientists Reconstruct Earth's Past Climates | Smithsonian Voices | National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Magazine

@jax said:

But it's ok for you reality deniers to say things like it's so hot and there's so many storms these days as if it's some great proof.

..... Yes.

Because there's data that shows trends over the relevant time period (since the industrial revolution...). 

@cccjwh said:

Plenty of proof posted, you just ignore it. Oh wait or is it the Derp state changing the numbers?

Climate Change Indicators: U.S. and Global Temperature | US EPA

Great!

We have satellite estimated temperature readings!

Now do the 1500’s and let’s compare.

@mld-woody said:

It's hilarious when you and other climate change deniers say this like you're making some great point... 

And you act like you’re making some great point! ?

@jax said:

But it's ok for you reality deniers to say things like it's so hot and there's so many storms these days as if it's some great proof.

Plenty of proof posted, you just ignore it. Oh wait or is it the Derp state changing the numbers? The Derp state, righty's tool for all topics.

Climate Change Indicators: U.S. and Global Temperature | US EPA

@mld-woody said:

It's hilarious when you and other climate change deniers say this like you're making some great point... 

But it's ok for you reality deniers to say things like it's so hot and there's so many storms these days as if it's some great proof.

@canton-dawg said:

Because the earth has never been this warm before. ?

Mercury is the closest planet to the sun, yet Venus is the hottest planet in our solar system. Let me know when you figure out why.

@canton-dawg said:

Because the earth has never been this warm before. ?

It's hilarious when you and other climate change deniers say this like you're making some great point... 

@cccjwh said:

Come on, the janitor's opinion is worth just as much as a rocket scientist. ?

Because the earth has never been this warm before. ?

@mld-woody said:

- 11 years old

- 49 former NASA employees, no climatologists

- over 18,000 people work for NASA just right now, let alone former employees

- again, feel free to read up https://climate.nasa.gov/

You have a very simple brain that has a knack for making false equivalencies. 100k experts could be telling you one thing, but if 2 "experts" disagree (and agree with you) then you'll immediately equate the two positions 

Come on, the janitor's opinion is worth just as much as a rocket scientist. ?

@ibleedbrown said:

I was surprised at the results. I don’t think it truly benefits either party in the long run. 

I think the most memorable thing about this vote was that there was literally one thing on the ballot. Anyone ever participate in any other election where there’s literally only one thing to vote for? That was a first for me. In and out on my lunch break, and still had time to check the mail.

I think you are correct.

WSS

I think the most memorable thing about this vote was that there was literally one thing on the ballot. Anyone ever participate in any other election where there’s literally only one thing to vote for? That was a first for me. In and out on my lunch break, and still had time to check the mail.

@hoorta said:

LOL, you want to get real Steve? "The Cult is strong here".   

I guess Trump bashing isn't allowed here. Pound salt. 

It most certainly is.

It's just a stupid was to discuss unrelated topics.

???

WSS

@hoorta said:

LOL, you want to get real Steve? "The Cult is strong here".   

I guess Trump bashing isn't allowed here. Pound salt. 

sober up.

@westside-steve said:

Yes idiots and drunks if you guys can't discuss any bill or  issue without ridiculous and irrelevant Trump bashishing. I understand why you voted the way you did. Because you hate Republicans. That's an idiotic / drunken reason.

To paraphrase Golds Meir "They hate us more than they love their children."

WSS

LOL, you want to get real Steve? "The Cult is strong here".   

I guess Trump bashing isn't allowed here. Pound salt.