<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that BE and DA have something in the go deep department(pun intented), and that BQ was really matched well with K2. Looking back, if we knew the Qb, I think we should have traded BE instead of K2. Quinn was always k2's choice(imo), those two had synchonicity(sp). The draft would make a helluva lot more sense, if we kept k2.</p>

<p>
<span style="color:#A0522D">Pat Mcmanhan, whom i don't like, wrote my exact thoughts on the viks game in regard to BQ:</span></p>

<p>
"  He threw short here, short there and short everywhere.</p>

<p>
When he did throw downfield, it was a fade or a deep go down the sideline. There were very few over-the-middle 20-yard ins or slants or posts when the game was ''competitive.''</p>

<p>
Quinn has his strengths, but taking chances down the field does not seem to be one of them at this point in his career. He'll do it occasionally, but more often than not, he'll take the checkdown.</p>

<p>
Which led to him having 72 yards passing early in the fourth quarter."</p>

<p>
Quinn will get better, but when i see him play, i don't see the long td pass and quick strike capability. I see a 5-15 yard qb and hope for a broken tackle and yac.</p>

<p>
 P.s.  Does anyone else think he looks like bilbo baggins out there...i thought he was like 6'3?</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/topic/6812/with-bq-we-should-have-traded-be-instead-of-k2</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 12:59:57 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://brownsboard.com/topic/6812.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:05:28 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Sat, 19 Sep 2009 03:04:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/alendor" aria-label="Profile: alendor">@<bdi>alendor</bdi></a> <a href="/post/107999">said</a>:</p>the more i watch BE the more i agree.  he can't run routes worth crap really.  bad deep ball route that last game, and he always lets the defender get in front of him on those slants.</blockquote>


<p>
I have to dissagree with you Alendor. Braylon's biggest strength is the hardest part of being a WR, he gets open A LOT! And then he drops it. He does let corners get in front of him on slants which should never happen when you have that large of a size advantage but those balls are also supposed to be thrown in the WR's gut, not his hands. Which I thought DA did a pretty good job with. Probably because that route also requires the QB to throw it hard and fast.  Anyways, when they are thrown too far in front of the WR, the DB has a much easier time getting his hands in there to make a play because the path of the ball becomes seperation between the WR and the ball and that does half of the DB's job for him right there. But he does get open a whole lot. Finishing the play has been his biggest issue.</p>

<p>
And that deep route last game I thought was fine. If I were him I would have went inside with it also because there was WAAAY more space inside to make a play on the ball. The sideline is just one more defender. One of DA's "inaccurate" throws would have been inside where Braylon could have made a play on it or most likely drop it. But any reciever  has a better chance against a DB than he does against a sideline.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/109515</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/109515</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mopaji]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 03:04:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:40:19 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/lumbergh" aria-label="Profile: lumbergh">@<bdi>lumbergh</bdi></a> <a href="/post/109189">said</a>:</p>while we're at it, let's give Anderson the TD to Winslow at Arizona in 2007 because he was pushed out.
<p>
That gives the Browns the W, so he really went 11-4.</p>

<p>
That also puts CLE in the playoffs that year, so he is a playoff QB.</p>

<p>
Also that is his 30th TD for the year, so he is actually the franchise record holder for TDs in a season.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
Wow, thats close. A whatever hair away from being the franchise leader for td's.  That would totally suck with DA's name in our record books. Wonder what kind of hair it was in that Cincy game?</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/109472</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/109472</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[hammertime]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 00:40:19 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:10:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>we have three 2nd rounders on the bench....which to me... SUX ass. Kokinis you are on notice!</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/109370</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/109370</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Solon16]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:10:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:09:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/brownindian" aria-label="Profile: brownindian">@<bdi>brownindian</bdi></a> <a href="/post/109360">said</a>:</p>just cos we have MoMass and Robiskie does not mean we should trade away BE. We dont know if they have even half the talent level of BE. If they were that good wont they see some playing time atleast ? The only reason i think we got 2 receivers is insurance, in case we get a big trade offer for BE after the draft. From what i have seem both of them are as inconsistent as BE and anyone who assumes that they both are currently as good as BE or better are wrong. 
<p>
Keeping K2 would have made sense but the bucks did not come for BE. We got a trade offer which we felt was good and traded ..</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
BS...2nd rounders as expected to start...not as "Insurance"...p.s <span style="color:#FF0000">"just cos we have MoMass and Robiskie does not mean we should trade away BE." </span>  we did try to trade BE!</p>

<p>
<span style="color:#FF8C00">"We dont know if they have even half the talent level of BE.</span> Don't draft them in the second round! Second rounders are expected to start!</p>

<p>
<span style="color:#A0522D">"From what i have seem both of them are as inconsistent as BE" </span> I haven't seen the on the field yet, but for a play here and there....again questionable draft picks</p>

<p>
<span style="color:#FFA500">"anyone who assumes that they both are currently as good as BE or better are wrong." </span> Again to my point....Questionable strategy in the draft room...</p>

<p>
FINALLY...THREE SECOND ROUND DRAFT PICKS NOT IMPACTING GAME....YET! I HOPE THEY DO!</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/109369</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/109369</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Solon16]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:09:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:34:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/solon16" aria-label="Profile: solon16">@<bdi>solon16</bdi></a> <a href="/post/109355">said</a>:</p>The point is....BQ is a better Qb with K2 than with BE...IMO.  Lost in this hijacked thread is the draft doesn't make sense to me by keeping BE...we brought it patten(for the he's a Mentor crowd), furrey is seasoned as well. Keeping K2 and adding royal made alot more sense than keeping BE when you take two 2nd round wr's. Second rounders are suppossed to contribute right away...we have three riding pine for the most part. It wont be to long before Edwards starts his me first,(i'm in a contract year)throw me the ball crap. Heated words on sideline ala TO. I mean ....we have three 2nd rounders on the bench....which to me... SUX ass.  Kokinis you are on notice!</blockquote>

<p>
just cos we have MoMass and Robiskie does not mean we should trade away BE. We dont know if they have even half the talent level of BE. If they were that good wont they see some playing time atleast ? The only reason i think we got 2 receivers is insurance, in case we get a big trade offer for BE after the draft. From what i have seem both of them are as inconsistent as BE and anyone who assumes that they both are currently as good as BE or better are wrong. </p>

<p>
Keeping K2 would have made sense but the bucks did not come for BE. We got a trade offer which we felt was good and traded ..</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/109360</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/109360</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[BrownIndian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:34:29 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:28:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>The point is....BQ is a better Qb with K2 than with BE...IMO.  Lost in this hijacked thread is the draft doesn't make sense to me by keeping BE...we brought it patten(for the he's a Mentor crowd), furrey is seasoned as well. Keeping K2 and adding royal made alot more sense than keeping BE when you take two 2nd round wr's. Second rounders are suppossed to contribute right away...we have three riding pine for the most part. It wont be to long before Edwards starts his me first,(i'm in a contract year)throw me the ball crap. Heated words on sideline ala TO. I mean ....we have three 2nd rounders on the bench....which to me... SUX ass.  Kokinis you are on notice!</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/109355</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/109355</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Solon16]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 20:28:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:53:36 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/choco" aria-label="Profile: choco">@<bdi>choco</bdi></a> <a href="/post/109236">said</a>:</p>now who's missing the point.....tubes101.....lol</blockquote>

<p>
Still you chief, still you.  Deciding you want to change the point doesn't actually change the point of what you responded to.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/109283</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/109283</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Masters]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:53:36 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:13:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>now who's missing the point.....tubes101.....lol</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/109236</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/109236</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[choco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:13:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:00:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/choco" aria-label="Profile: choco">@<bdi>choco</bdi></a> <a href="/post/109193">said</a>:</p>no...its a stupid point.  <b>at this rate, queen will have 30TD's by the end of the season, while still being outscored by dawson.</b>
</blockquote>

<p>
Because you say so?  If you understood the point you wouldn't even say what I bolded above.  No one is saying it actually is a TD or counts as one.  Scoring a TD in the air was never the point.  The point was even specifically stated in Riffers post you responded to: <span>"but the point was it was a deep ball with isolated coverage"</span></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/109228</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/109228</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Masters]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 18:00:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:59:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Masters <a href="/post/109185">said</a>:</p>Missing the point.</blockquote>
<p>
no...its a stupid point.  at this rate, queen will have 30TD's by the end of the season, while still being outscored by dawson.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/109193</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/109193</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[choco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:59:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:57:24 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/lumbergh" aria-label="Profile: lumbergh">@<bdi>lumbergh</bdi></a> <a href="/post/109189">said</a>:</p>while we're at it, let's give Anderson the TD to Winslow at Arizona in 2007 because he was pushed out.
<p>
That gives the Browns the W, so he really went 11-4.</p>

<p>
That also puts CLE in the playoffs that year, so he is a playoff QB.</p>

<p>
Also that is his 30th TD for the year, so he is actually the franchise record holder for TDs in a season.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
 <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f644.png?v=aee8435e68b" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--face_with_rolling_eyes" title=":face_with_rolling_eyes:" alt="🙄" /><img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f606.png?v=aee8435e68b" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--laughing" title=":laughing:" alt="😆" /></p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/109191</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/109191</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Masters]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:57:24 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:55:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/riffer-x" aria-label="Profile: riffer-x">@<bdi>riffer-x</bdi></a> <a href="/post/108967">said</a>:</p>only to have it taken away by a xxxx hair review yeah, it was a TD.</blockquote>

<p>
while we're at it, let's give Anderson the TD to Winslow at Arizona in 2007 because he was pushed out.</p>

<p>
That gives the Browns the W, so he really went 11-4.</p>

<p>
That also puts CLE in the playoffs that year, so he is a playoff QB.</p>

<p>
Also that is his 30th TD for the year, so he is actually the franchise record holder for TDs in a season.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/109189</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/109189</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Lumbergh]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:55:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:48:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/choco" aria-label="Profile: choco">@<bdi>choco</bdi></a> <a href="/post/109182">said</a>:</p>rules are rules....every team abides by them.  hence...not a TD.
<p>
did we get 6 points?  no?  ok then</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
Missing the point.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/109185</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/109185</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Masters]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:48:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:45:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/riffer-x" aria-label="Profile: riffer-x">@<bdi>riffer-x</bdi></a> <a href="/post/108967">said</a>:</p>Well considering the DB had to ride Braylons out of bounds and he still came back in and caught it for a TD only to have it taken away by a xxxx hair review yeah, it was a TD. It doesn't go into the stat books as one, but the point was it was a deep ball with isolated coverage. 
<p>
Carry on choco ono</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
rules are rules....every team abides by them.  hence...not a TD.</p>

<p>
did we get 6 points?  no?  ok then</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/109182</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/109182</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[choco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:45:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:16:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/daddybull1" aria-label="Profile: daddybull1">@<bdi>daddybull1</bdi></a> <a href="/post/108956">said</a>:</p>We traded the right player in that KWII is on the downside of his career physically.... I'm amazed that he stilllays at a high level...
<p>
BE can be a beast if he's focused.. I hate to say it but we don't have any burners in our receiving corps which would take pressure off of BE...</p>

<p>
<b>I agree with ya Riffer, you have to take what the defense gives you and play to your strengths....</b></p>

<p>
Unlike you however I still haven't made up my mind about Brady.... I question his arm strength, in that, you need to throw ropes on those 25 - 30 yard passes.... Your D backs have so much speed that the window of opportunity closes so quickly....</p>

<p>
Brady had a bad game against the Vikings but the good thing is, theres another game this week and we'll see if he grows and learns from his mistakes....</p>

<p>
Peace</p>

<p>
T.Dawg</p>
</blockquote>

<p>
Not sure where I ever said I was convinced about anything regarding Quinn, I just want to see him for a year. I think he has plenty of arm though, that has been discussed ad nauseum here with quite a bit of proof that he has plenty of arm needed.</p>

<p>
Nobody is saying he has DA's arm, but he has an NFL arm.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/108970</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/108970</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Riffer X]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:16:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:08:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/choco" aria-label="Profile: choco">@<bdi>choco</bdi></a> <a href="/post/108959">said</a>:</p>
<img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f633.png?v=aee8435e68b" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--flushed" title=":flushed:" alt="😳" />  huh?</blockquote>

<p>
Well considering the DB had to ride Braylons out of bounds and he still came back in and caught it for a TD only to have it taken away by a cunt hair review yeah, it was a TD. It doesn't go into the stat books as one, but the point was it was a deep ball with isolated coverage. </p>

<p>
Carry on choco ono</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/108967</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/108967</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Riffer X]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:08:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:52:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/daddybull1" aria-label="Profile: daddybull1">@<bdi>daddybull1</bdi></a> <a href="/post/108956">said</a>:</p>I hate to say it but we don't have any burners in our receiving corps which would take pressure off of BE...</blockquote>

<p>
This is what Stallworth was ostensibly signed for.  In theory it should have worked waaaaaay better than it did in practice.</p>

<p>
Where are James Jett, Willie Gault and, I dunno, Usain Bolt when you need them.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/108962</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/108962</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[mz.]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:52:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:03:11 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/riffer-x" aria-label="Profile: riffer-x">@<bdi>riffer-x</bdi></a> <a href="/post/108943">said</a>:</p>
<b>On the one it was a TD</b> and the other it was a miscommunication for a pick.</blockquote>
<p>
 <img src="https://brownsboard.com/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f633.png?v=aee8435e68b" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--flushed" title=":flushed:" alt="😳" />  huh?</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/108959</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/108959</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[choco]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:03:11 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:02:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/daddybull1" aria-label="Profile: daddybull1">@<bdi>daddybull1</bdi></a> <a href="/post/108956">said</a>:</p>We traded the right player in that KWII is on the downside of his career physically.... I'm amazed that he stilllays at a high level...
<p>
BE can be a beast if he's focused.. I hate to say it but we don't have any burners in our receiving corps which would take pressure off of BE...</p>

<p>
I agree with ya Riffer, you have to take what the defense gives you and play to your strengths....</p>

<p>
Unlike you however I still haven't made up my mind about Brady.... I question his arm strength, in that, you need to throw ropes on those 25 - 30 yard passes.... Your D backs have so much speed that the window of opportunity closes so quickly....</p>

<p>
Brady had a bad game against the Vikings but the good thing is, theres another game this week and we'll see if he grows and learns from his mistakes....</p>

<p>
Peace</p>

<p>
T.Dawg</p>
</blockquote>


<p>
The question will be though, will it be a better game because he learned/gets more practice time in with the #1's or will it be a better game because hes playing against a less tenacious defense?  I agree though that you don't force the long ball just to keep the "arm strength" question at bay, you read the coverage and take what the d gives you.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/108958</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/108958</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[RPrepublic]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:02:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:53:37 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>We traded the right player in that KWII is on the downside of his career physically.... I'm amazed that he stilllays at a high level...</p>

<p>
BE can be a beast if he's focused.. I hate to say it but we don't have any burners in our receiving corps which would take pressure off of BE...</p>

<p>
I agree with ya Riffer, you have to take what the defense gives you and play to your strengths....</p>

<p>
Unlike you however I still haven't made up my mind about Brady.... I question his arm strength, in that, you need to throw ropes on those 25 - 30 yard passes.... Your D backs have so much speed that the window of opportunity closes so quickly....</p>

<p>
Brady had a bad game against the Vikings but the good thing is, theres another game this week and we'll see if he grows and learns from his mistakes....</p>

<p>
Peace</p>

<p>
T.Dawg</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/108956</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/108956</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[daddybull1]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 04:53:37 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:12:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Chickenwang <a href="/post/108926">said</a>:</p>I'm still trying to figure out how Quinn threw deep multiple times all 4 years in college.  The guy was always throwing bombs for completions to people.   But now he can't throw deep?  Do the big guns get in the way?</blockquote>

<p>
People misconstrue the arm strength with going deep. Young QB's generally go against 2 and 3 deep coverages or at times with 8 in the box. It basically takes away the deep threat while putting the strong safety up tight. They have to show a propensity to beat that coverage with underneath stuff that beats the blitz and moves the chains. It also helps to have a running game of substance. Once defenses are forced to adjust then they can start taking shots downfield. </p>

<p>
While I agree you have to take some shots in the middle of the field I would rather my guy not force it. I would rather the offense dictate to the defense what they're going to do. You get dinked and dunked on enough with the chains moving you'll change things up.</p>

<p>
Quinn took some shots last week with Braylon when there was no safety help. On the one it was a TD and the other it was a miscommunication for a pick.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/108943</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/108943</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Riffer X]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:12:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:00:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>I'm still trying to figure out how Quinn threw deep multiple times all 4 years in college.  The guy was always throwing bombs for completions to people.   But now he can't throw deep?  Do the big guns get in the way?</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/108926</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/108926</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[Rooster Dick]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 02:00:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:25:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/the-gipper" aria-label="Profile: the-gipper">@<bdi>the-gipper</bdi></a> <a href="/post/108032">said</a>:</p><b>No, I definitely think they will go for Defensive line help.  Whatever the hell they do they need to start stopping the run.</b></blockquote>


<p>
They stopped the run just fine in the first half, they need endurance.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/108400</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/108400</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[AdaM]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:25:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to With BQ, we should have traded BE instead of K2 on Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:06:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><a class="plugin-mentions-user plugin-mentions-a" href="/user/vegasdogg" aria-label="Profile: vegasdogg">@<bdi>vegasdogg</bdi></a> <a href="/post/108199">said</a>:</p>Although I liked him as a player, we got rid of the right guy at the right time, IMO.</blockquote>

<p>
spot on. while BE has scopes of improving and hey if his voided TD catch was something to go by, we will still have a legit threat for years to come. K2 was like our Wall street going down down down,  with no bailout.</p>]]></description><link>https://brownsboard.com/post/108398</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://brownsboard.com/post/108398</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[BrownIndian]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:06:09 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>