@lumbergh said:

my request to you was to google the words dink, dunk, and quinn

did you do it yet?

Ooh, I did!

The Google said:

No results found for "the words dink, dunk, and quinn".

@wpb-dawg-fan said:

I had no idea he was having that many injections ... I thought he developed normally.

@lumbergh said:

and like I pointed out in the other thread, he took 7 shots downfield in game 1....so much for that offering lummy

@wpb-dawg-fan said:

so Quinn's similar but without the downfield strikes. As I was saying...

@cmac12 said:

LOL....even when Quinn was at his absolute worst, he still had a better stat line then DA in that game. LMAO!

5-14 51yds 35.7% 1 INT, 1 Fumble, 17.3 QBR

Pathetic

@lumbergh said:

They sure the fook aren't reminiscing about 140 YPG. They don't miss 20 turnovers per season. And they certainly don't miss 17.3 QBR.

@vegasdogg said:

NFL.com offically lists his wins and losses for 2008 @ 3-7, so eat a dick.

L I N K

DA did not start this game though. He came in at halftime. And I know when I did his stats for last year I included it just like in 2007 I included stats from Pittsburgh but he did not start that game either.

BQs stats for that START

Brady Quinn CLE 8 18 94 0 2 42 with a rating of 21.3

And DA did only start 9 games, he played in 10.

@lumbergh said:

my request to you was to google the words dink, dunk, and quinn

did you do it yet?

And I challenge you to do the same with this

dink dunk 'tom brady'

you will see that Tom Brady is considered to be a dink n dunk QB by most, but that he is also opportunistic and goes downfield on occasion.

just sayin'

I just want to hear your submis... explanation

@inspecta said:

that's for vegas.

my request to you was to google the words dink, dunk, and quinn

did you do it yet?

@cmac12 said:

I have not seen anybody but lum that says bench BQ now.

No I don't think he should be benched yet. Let BQ Nation get the Bernie Kosar reminiscing out of their system. (however it may not take too long at the current pace)

Then when the real QB of this team comes in, BQ Nation will be over it so they won't boo and chant for their Brady-pie all game long.

@inspecta said:

Turned into?

I have not seen anybody but lum that says bench BQ now. I have seen several people (me included) that have said that BQ played a really bad game and have just refuted the notion that he played a C game and not a D game. I had said that he played horrible, but it was pointed out that he did not play Cutler horrible so I did change my mind to make my grade a D and not an F.

BQ's overall stat line was a D+ or C - (and if you want to know both BQ and DA got a D+ last year from me) but considering how bad it was before the Vikings started playing prevent defense I will stick with my D rating. I said on another post that it was one game, you can not judge anybody on one game. I do want to see if BQ can string together a few games together.

It seems to me that if a person says BQ played poorly and calls him dink and dunk (which he did do that one game) that you think they are calling for DA. At this time this is not about DA, because he is not the starter. It is all about BQs performance. And last game he played BAD, he did not help the team in anyway. That does not mean that is who he is, it just means he played a bad game.

He is hoping that BQ plays much better this week against Denver. Oh and on a side note if BQ does not play well then is it because of the vastly improved Denver defense? I for one will come in and say BQ had a good game if I think he did. It is on to start number 5 comparison.

@vegasdogg said:

yeah NFL.com doesn't do it by starts. They list all career games, and somehow you came up with 28?

FYI they also put the KC win in there in 2006 (yet you didn't???)

now go fetch me that coffee.

@lumbergh said:

Yeah, he was 5-14 for 51 yards, 1INT and 1 FUMBLE, with a 17.3 QBR vs HOU. I wouldn't want to count that game either.

NFL.com offically lists his wins and losses for 2008 @ 3-7, so eat a dick.

Splits By Wins/Losses G Att Comp Pct Yds Avg Lng TD Int 1st 1st% 20+ Sck SckY Rate

Losses 7 203 95 46.8 921 4.5 28 5 7 53 26.1 7 12 66 53.8

Wins 3 80 47 58.8 694 8.7 70 4 1 29 36.2 9 2 21 98.6

L I N K

@vegasdogg said:

I see where you F'd it up.

He was 3-6 in 2008, not 3-7.

now run along son. fetch me my morning coffee.

@lumbergh said:

did you make it up?

He was 0-3 in 2006, 10-5 in 2007, and 3-7 in 2008.

2006

13 12/03 KC W 31-28 1 0 12 21 57.1 171 8.1 2 1 1 5 95.5 2 44 22.0 0 -- -- 1-0

14 12/07 @ PIT L 7-27 1 1 21 37 56.8 276 7.5 1 1 0 0 78.2 1 4 4.0 0 1 1 1-1

15 12/17 @ BAL L 17-27 1 1 23 32 71.9 223 7.0 2 2 5 41 85.8 -- -- -- -- 1 0 1-2

16 12/24 TB L 7-22 1 1 10 27 37.0 123 4.6 0 4 2 20 12.3 1 -1 -1.0 0 -- -- 1-3

2007

1 09/09 PIT L 7-34 1 0 13 28 46.4 184 6.6 1 1 1 12 65.2 1 -1 -1.0 0 1 1

2 09/16 CIN W 51-45 1 1 20 33 60.6 328 9.9 5 1 0 0 121.0 1 -1 -1.0 0 1 0

3 09/23 @ OAK L 24-26 1 1 18 37 48.6 248 6.7 1 2 1 24 57.0 2 12 6.0 1 1 0

4 09/30 BAL W 27-13 1 1 10 18 55.6 204 11.3 2 1 0 0 109.5 3 0 0.0 0 -- --

5 10/07 @ NE L 17-34 1 1 22 43 51.2 287 6.7 2 3 3 26 59.0 3 7 2.3 0 -- --

6 10/14 MIA W 41-31 1 1 18 25 72.0 245 9.8 3 0 1 1 142.5 5 13 2.6 1 -- --

7 Bye -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- --

8 10/28 @ STL W 27-20 1 1 18 25 72.0 248 9.9 3 0 2 12 143.0 1 -1 -1.0 0 -- --

9 11/04 SEA W 33-30 1 1 29 48 60.4 364 7.6 0 1 0 0 75.3 2 21 10.5 0 -- --

10 11/11 @ PIT L 28-31 1 1 16 35 45.7 123 3.5 3 0 0 0 83.4 2 5 2.5 0 -- --

11 11/18 @ BAL W 33-30 1 1 24 38 63.2 274 7.2 0 1 1 5 73.8 4 -4 -1.0 1 -- --

12 11/25 HOU W 27-17 1 1 24 35 68.6 253 7.2 2 1 1 4 96.5 -- -- -- -- 1 0

13 12/02 @ ARI L 21-27 1 1 21 41 51.2 304 7.4 2 2 1 9 71.6 2 10 5.0 0 1 1

14 12/09 @ NYJ W 24-18 1 1 16 29 55.2 185 6.4 2 1 0 0 83.3 3 3 1.0 0 -- --

15 12/16 BUF W 8-0 1 1 9 24 37.5 137 5.7 0 0 1 7 57.1 1 0 0.0 0 -- --

16 12/23 @ CIN L 14-19 1 1 29 48 60.4 251 5.2 2 4 1 7 53.4 1 6 6.0 0 -- --

17 12/30 SF W 20-7 1 1 11 20 55.0 152 7.6 1 1 1 2 75.4 1 0 0.0 0 -- --

2008

1 09/07 DAL L 10-28 1 1 11 24 45.8 114 4.8 1 0 1 0 74.0 4 24 6.0 0 2 0

2 09/14 PIT L 6-10 1 1 18 32 56.3 166 5.2 0 2 2 11 44.5 3 6 2.0 0 -- --

3 09/21 @ BAL L 10-28 1 1 14 37 37.8 125 3.4 1 3 4 26 22.9 2 -1 -0.5 0 1 0

4 09/28 @ CIN W 20-12 1 1 15 24 62.5 138 5.8 1 1 1 11 74.7 4 11 2.8 0 1 0

5 Bye -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- --

6 10/13 NYG W 35-14 1 1 18 29 62.1 310 10.7 2 0 0 0 121.3 4 -2 -0.5 0 1 0

7 10/19 @ WAS L 11-14 1 1 14 37 37.8 136 3.7 1 0 1 2 57.9 3 4 1.3 0 1 0

8 10/26 @ JAC W 23-17 1 1 14 27 51.9 246 9.1 1 0 1 10 95.6 -- -- -- -- 1 0

9 11/02 BAL L 27-37 1 1 17 33 51.5 219 6.6 2 1 1 9 80.2 2 8 4.0 0 -- --

10 11/06 DEN L 30-34 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- --

11 11/17 @ BUF W 29-27 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 0.0 -- -- -- -- -- --

12 11/23 HOU L 6-16 1 0 5 14 35.7 51 3.6 0 1 0 0 17.3 1 0 0.0 0 1 1

13 11/30 IND L 6-10 1 1 16 26 61.5 110 4.2 0 0 3 18 71.0 2 5 2.5 0 1 1

Zombo said:

Zombo

Different schedule (on paper it is harder than the 2007 schedule, but really won't know until the games are played).

I would say the offensive weapons are not as good this year (2yr older Lewis, no Winslow, an no JJ). But again, that's just on paper today.

This coaching staff has a different offensive philosophy than the previous (ball/clock control offense vs. a spread score quick offense).

Quinn doesn't have the arm DA has to surprise teams the first time they see him w/ little film to go off of.

Asking why X player can't do what Y player did is always a slippery slope. Every season and every circumstance is different. There is a reason for the saying of "on any given Sunday"....

@lumbergh said:

The offense is run oriented and at the same time is balanced?

Nice analysis dipshit.

BTW Quinn threw it 35 times on Sunday.

21 of those were in the 4th Q....dipshit.

He had only 11 passes in the first half, and 14 by the end of the 3rd...that is balanced...but leaning towards the run....dipshit.

Oh well...there I go feeding the animals again.

@vegasdogg said:

he's an "it's a process" coach? And that means......?

The coach is methodical? As opposed to......?

The offense is run oriented and at the same time is balanced?

Nice analysis dipshit.

BTW Quinn threw it 35 times on Sunday. There were 20 runs.

Zombo said:

Zombo

Because Mangini is a more balanced, run oriented, methodical, "it's a process" type coach. He is not asking his QB to toss it up as much. Different offense, different TE, different players.

Zombo said:

Zombo

I'd say for starters the situation is not the same (different schedule, different roster, different coaching staff, etc.).

@shepwrite said:

Fair enough.

No, shep, it's not okay. He's too good looking. He might have me questioning my sexuality after 24 starts. No, shep, we need to nip this plague in the bud lest we revert to the evils of Sodom and Gomorrah.

But if he does continue starting, I can at least call his supporters gay. That makes me straight.