<![CDATA[Our schedule isn't helping]]> Minnesota is 3 and 0

Denver is 3 and 0

Baltimore is 3 and 0

2 of the above teams I think have a shot at the superbowl this year.......

All of this season is dead talkl is bullshit. Lets wait and see how we play against the rest of the teams.......enough of the gibberish.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/7213/our-schedule-isn-t-helpingRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 06:03:16 GMTMon, 28 Sep 2009 13:45:07 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Our schedule isn't helping on Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:52:44 GMT]]>i have noticed that but the reason all those teams are unbeaten is partly because theyve played us.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/114782https://brownsboard.com/post/114782Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:52:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Our schedule isn't helping on Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:20:10 GMT]]>Who knows...the season is young.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/114750https://brownsboard.com/post/114750Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:20:10 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Our schedule isn't helping on Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:19:06 GMT]]>Maybe for Denver........but not Minnesota or Baltimore.......

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/114749https://brownsboard.com/post/114749Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:19:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Our schedule isn't helping on Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:17:59 GMT]]>Football doesn't exist in a vacuum. Each of those teams have had free and easy wins vs us. So their records are less a function of how good they are but more related to how fortunate they've been to have played vs us.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/114747https://brownsboard.com/post/114747Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:17:59 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Our schedule isn't helping on Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:01:44 GMT]]>

@nigeltufnel said:

It's not that we lost, it's how we lost. Sodomy comes to mind when I think about the last 3 games.

Losing is one thing. Looking limp and impotent is another.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/114731https://brownsboard.com/post/114731Mon, 28 Sep 2009 16:01:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Our schedule isn't helping on Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:57:48 GMT]]>

@buster said:

I'd like to see how any other team would fair against playing these 3 teams for their first 3 games. My bet would be that not many would be above .500

It's not that we lost, it's how we lost. Sodomy comes to mind when I think about the last 3 games.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/114724https://brownsboard.com/post/114724Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:57:48 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Our schedule isn't helping on Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:55:36 GMT]]>

@clevelandfanforlife said:

yeah, i have never seen a team give up this early in the year.

I don't think they have given up yet, but they will at some point.

I don't buy in to all the mangini hate, but he does have some players who would rather be elsewhere..we are just going to have to live with it until mangini has his team...then we will see what sort of deal we have going.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/114721https://brownsboard.com/post/114721Mon, 28 Sep 2009 15:55:36 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Our schedule isn't helping on Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:53:51 GMT]]>Kansas scored 3 TD's against Ravens. Infact all the teams listed dont have TD problems, they have a chosen QB. And that scares me.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/114633https://brownsboard.com/post/114633Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:53:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Our schedule isn't helping on Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:52:22 GMT]]>A win vs Cincy will be a good start.......and if we can beat them we can beat Pittsburgh......something smells rotton in Pitt and it's not the usually BO from the people living there........

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/114631https://brownsboard.com/post/114631Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:52:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Our schedule isn't helping on Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:51:21 GMT]]>

@buster said:

I'd like to see how any other team would fair against playing these 3 teams for their first 3 games. My bet would be that not many would be above .500

the broncos suck and won't go .500. the other two are legit.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/114630https://brownsboard.com/post/114630Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:51:21 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Our schedule isn't helping on Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:50:47 GMT]]>

@ballpeen said:

We might win 3-4 games tops.

Ahhh...the season is over.

The only way we were going to make some noise this year would have been to start strong and feed off of that.

We have started about as badly as a team can start, and sorry to say, we are feeding off of that.

yeah, i have never seen a team give up this early in the year.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/114629https://brownsboard.com/post/114629Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:50:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Our schedule isn't helping on Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:50:32 GMT]]> I'd like to see how any other team would fair against playing these 3 teams for their first 3 games. My bet would be that not many would be above .500

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/114628https://brownsboard.com/post/114628Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:50:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Our schedule isn't helping on Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:49:58 GMT]]>We might win 3-4 games tops.

Ahhh...the season is over.

The only way we were going to make some noise this year would have been to start strong and feed off of that.

We have started about as badly as a team can start, and sorry to say, we are feeding off of that.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/114627https://brownsboard.com/post/114627Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:49:58 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Our schedule isn't helping on Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:49:07 GMT]]>

@buster said:

Minnesota is 3 and 0

Denver is 3 and 0

Baltimore is 3 and 0

2 of the above teams I think have a shot at the superbowl this year.......

All of this season is dead talkl is bullshit. Lets wait and see how we play against the rest of the teams.......enough of the gibberish.

the rest of the schedule will certainly help. lions, chiefs, raiders, jabs, bills. there is no excuse for not winning at least 2 or 3. a few weeks ago i had us down for 5 wins verse those guys.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/114626https://brownsboard.com/post/114626Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:49:07 GMT