<![CDATA[Peter Kings MMQB - No Surprises]]>"e. I can't believe how bad the Browns looked in Baltimore. As Olbermann said, "Tackling was optional.'' When I picked Cleveland to go 2-14 in SI before the season, my reasons were simple: The Browns don't have a quarterback, don't have an offensive weapon who scares a defensive coordinator, and don't have a defensive player (except maybe Shaun Rogers) who you have to gameplan around. Nothing's changed. What's sad is the Browns aren't in better shape for the future than they were as an expansion team in 1999.

f. Cleveland, Tampa Bay, Kansas City, St. Louis, Oakland ... 32, 31, 30, 29, 28."

Lovely. Ranked lower than Oakland and St. Louis.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/7235/peter-kings-mmqb-no-surprisesRSS for NodeFri, 02 Oct 2026 12:59:38 GMTMon, 28 Sep 2009 20:36:39 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Peter Kings MMQB - No Surprises on Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:44:39 GMT]]>

@mopaji said:

The Browns suck!

signed,

Detroit Lions fan

wait till we kick ur sorry ass in the next half of the season u Lions fan ! we may be down now but we sure aint out !

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/115487https://brownsboard.com/post/115487Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:44:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Peter Kings MMQB - No Surprises on Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:41:54 GMT]]>

@shepwrite said:

I watched St. Louis, and I think they are better than us. Oakland? That's pretty close. They have a #1 overall bust, which is just really painful (and most people saw it coming).

My biggest miss was thinking we had a good defense. Yikes.

It might be a miss on D....but i don't think it is that bad.

Most of our defensive problems come after the half when the game is pretty much over..it's human nature to let up when you know you don't stand a chance.

If we get in a game where we have a chance to score and the game is more of a game, I expect to see the D stand a little stiffer....maybe I should say hope??

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/115484https://brownsboard.com/post/115484Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:41:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Peter Kings MMQB - No Surprises on Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:28:00 GMT]]>Becoming a Lions fan would be bandwagoning, to be honest.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/115474https://brownsboard.com/post/115474Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:28:00 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Peter Kings MMQB - No Surprises on Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:05:44 GMT]]>The Browns suck!

signed,

Detroit Lions fan

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/115296https://brownsboard.com/post/115296Tue, 29 Sep 2009 01:05:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Peter Kings MMQB - No Surprises on Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:08:37 GMT]]>The defense "may" be better but it hasn't shone through.

The regression this past week was complete by their sheer lack of ability to force a punt until the second half. No stops, no tackling, coverage breakdowns, etc. Had nothing to do with being gassed this week. Seriously.

They're bad right now. Really bad.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/115119https://brownsboard.com/post/115119Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:08:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Peter Kings MMQB - No Surprises on Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:48:05 GMT]]>3 down 13 to go! 29 if you can't 2010.

There's always 2011.... barring a lockout.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/115091https://brownsboard.com/post/115091Mon, 28 Sep 2009 20:48:05 GMT