@mld-woody said:

peck peck *fart* peck peck

   your phony grandiose claims are infantile. You need to grow up, if that's possible.

@jax said:

What in the hell are you babbling about now?

You're either really that stupid or you're being purposely dense to avoid the topic (you getting called out by your own definition). 

Either way seems like a big waste of my time at this point. 

@jax said:

What in the hell are you babbling about now?

Surely he/she/bird has no idea. The bird admits he wants the forum shut down, it seems that the whole bunch of posts are designed to raise hell, so the bird can whine about being a "victim".

It's what leftwing birdbrains do.

@mld-woody said:

You already replied to an earlier post stating "DEI is a policy set to discriminate". 

Are you changing your mind now after being called out? Looking to just tip toe around your own hypocrisy? I'm not surprised. Just like ignoring everything about the ridiculousness of a meritocracy. 

What in the hell are you babbling about now?

@mld-woody said:

peck peck *fart* peck peck

and misinterpret it to your own bias. It's all you can do, I guess.

You're a moron.

@calfoxwc said:

but Woodpecker has his own definitions for words, that way he feels like

he has a point, other than his beak.

I literally used the definition Jax provided, you senile old man

@jax said:

Well, that's called DEI already.

You already replied to an earlier post stating "DEI is a policy set to discriminate". 

Are you changing your mind now after being called out? Looking to just tip toe around your own hypocrisy? I'm not surprised. Just like ignoring everything about the ridiculousness of a meritocracy. 

he has a point, other than his beak.

@mld-woody said:

And if an individual said they only want to hire gay black women, not because there's a "directive", but because they just want to, then you'd be cool with it. .... 

Well, that's called DEI already.

@jax said:

I can't speak for Cysko but you know the main difference here is Cysko isn't following a directive, a policy?

He's just an individual following his own rules and whatever.

DEI is a policy set to discriminate.

Riiiiiight. 

And if an individual said they only want to hire gay black women, not because there's a "directive", but because they just want to, then you'd be cool with it. .... 

At the end of the day, like most things the right gets you all to react to, there's a difference between reality and the fearmongering propaganda you're fed. You've made up your mind on what DEI is and what it means, in a way that aligns with your already held beliefs, and nothing is changing that. It's clear based on what you post here you and others are too far down that rabbit hole and I'm not gonna change your mind. So I'll just point out the hypocrisy as I see it. 

But you can continue to live in the fantasy world where DEI is the only thing preventing a meritocracy in our country. Where every straight, white male in a position of power is completely based on merit. Where every underrepresented minority in a position of power that you don't like is only there because of the vague, mysterious DEI. Also woke and trans and whatever over words are triggering you. 

He's just an individual following his own rules and whatever.

DEI is a policy set to discriminate.

@the-cysko-kid said:

That's where you're wrong, as usual, again. Seperate almost any of those things from each other and a person can be seen as being serious. 

Put them together and you might as well dress them in clown gear with a rubber chicken. 

And you're so fucking disingenuous and dishonest. You know perfectly well what the left is doing. 

You said you weren't hiring people based on their race and sexual orientation. Sounds like exactly what posters on here claim the left is doing. Literally your words from your post. 

I've been hiring folks for a while now and I'm hiring the best people for the team. I also recognize and have seen the benefits of a team with diversity in thought / how they attack problems

And, again (more to others on here) this fantasy that our country was always a meritocracy and it is only just now changing cuz of DEI is a fucking joke. The same people that would tell you America needs to return to the 50s and not recognize any of the many many problems with that. 

@mld-woody said:

Great to hear you're considering race and sexual orientation in hiring. The exact same thing you and others claim "the left" is doing. 

That's where you're wrong, as usual, again. Seperate almost any of those things from each other and a person can be seen as being serious. 

Put them together and you might as well dress them in clown gear with a rubber chicken. 

And you're so fucking disingenuous and dishonest. You know perfectly well what the left is doing. 

It's a free country, an employer must have the OPTION to not hire whoever would make his company look bad.

@the-cysko-kid said:

What you're calling hypocrisy is just something the left created by ranking who should be hired in a heiarchy and putting the actual most desirable candidates at the bottom. I'm full time management now and I can tell you 100% that I'm not hiring a black, trans, neuroqueer leftist to represent my company to clients. It would not give any of them an ounce of confidence that we would accomplish the job we're being contracted for. 

Great to hear you're considering race and sexual orientation in hiring. The exact same thing you and others claim "the left" is doing. 

@mld-woody said:

You're getting closer to the hypocrisy I'm pointing out that's getting completely ignored by some on here 

What you're calling hypocrisy is just something the left created by ranking who should be hired in a heiarchy and putting the actual most desirable candidates at the bottom. I'm full time management now and I can tell you 100% that I'm not hiring a black, trans, neuroqueer leftist to represent my company to clients. It would not give any of them an ounce of confidence that we would accomplish the job we're being contracted for. 

@calfoxwc said:

woodpecker redefines "dei" as hiring/promotions based on being gay/trans/birdbrains regardless of ability or accomplishment.

just more perverted definitions from birdie:

You're making my point. Thank you 

just more perverted definitions from birdie:

@the-cysko-kid said:

If you have a problem with this maybe you ought to think about whether DEI was ever a good practice to begin with. 

You're getting closer to the hypocrisy I'm pointing out that's getting completely ignored by some on here 

@mld-woody said:

Hahahaha

Ok so Cal is pro DEI. Good to know 

Mandating hiring of "diverse viewpoints"

Obviously you morons are never going to understand the blatant hypocrisy here, or at the very least you'll never admit it, but it's always fun watching you squirm 

Now that was funny… you think you make people squirm.

How can you say you’re having fun when you’re this angry?

And based on your other links, you're still not following along here. I can't make it any clearer. Oh well

Pay for it out of your own perverted pocket.