Another Study Confirms: Antarctica Isn't Melting

@mld-woody said:

You are a dementia riddled, failing, moronic old man. You're a drain on society. I hope the apple fell far from the tree. Jesus. 

You're bitching about there not being a source and not explaining what you want sourced 

You're a God damn moron and it's clear how you're so easily politically manipulated 

If you don't believe in God or Jesus.. Quit saying their names asshole... Man up and say "Laken Riley"... You COWARD!

@calfoxwc said:

no source. It must have been a secret bit of info from some UN org.

Those thrill you. but the UN is a worthless, expensive pile of woodpecker crap.

You need help untwisting your beak? Call a local ornithologist. Your unfounded, self-serving, completely dishonest fake observations about other posters does nothing but to make you seem like a Forrest Gump woodpecker - and very self-destructive emotionally.

You are a dementia riddled, failing, moronic old man. You're a drain on society. I hope the apple fell far from the tree. Jesus. 

You're bitching about there not being a source and not explaining what you want sourced 

You're a God damn moron and it's clear how you're so easily politically manipulated 

@mld-woody said:

*fart*

no source. It must have been a secret bit of info from some UN org.

Those thrill you. but the UN is a worthless, expensive pile of woodpecker crap.

You need help untwisting your beak? Call a local ornithologist. Your unfounded, self-serving, completely dishonest fake observations about other posters does nothing but to make you seem like a Forrest Gump woodpecker - and very self-destructive emotionally.

@calfoxwc said:

no link? your claims are bs. You keep woodpecker hopping around the truth.

Maybe your real name is Jessica.......

No link for what? Your dumbass senile self types over all of my quoted posts. 

I recognize I'm engaging with an absolute and complete moron right now, but what are you bitching about regarding a source? 

You've literally never gotten anything right on this topic. But thanks to your complete inability to take on new information that conflicts with your world view, you're still proudly prancing around like you're somehow correct and no one can prove you wrong. It's asinine 

@mld-woody said:

peck peck peck *fart*

no link? your claims are bs. You keep woodpecker hopping around the truth.

Maybe your real name is Jessica.......

@calfoxwc said:

so, don't be a dodo bird, woodpecker. Do NOT look at the sun.

But, sunspots occur generally every 11 years? and sunspots warm the earth.

then the earth cools down again.

Upsies and downsies, woodpecker. Not man made global warming crisis nothing.

https://scied.ucar.edu/activity/sunspots-and-climate

Ah, there it is. You bringing up the sun. One of your standard go tos that, once again, no one is fucking disputing. You aren't following. You aren't bringing up anything climatologists don't already know.... Christ

Now tell me about the rainforests next

@calfoxwc said:

Your simpleton generalizations and attempted insults to do enable you to

make any kind of valid point.

oh, so it's "accuracy" that is your excuse to ignore the climate changing since the beginning of time on earth?

Let's go back to 2500 B.C. Lookie, lookie Woodpecker ! See the fluctuations?

Upsies? Downsies? Upsies? Downsies?Upsies? Downsies?Upsies? Downsies?

BTW, the "2040" is a terrible typo....

How convenient it is that you like STARTING with 1880 for "accuracy".

http://www.longrangeweather.com/global_temperatures.htm

Cal... Everyone knows the climate naturally cycles. You aren't presenting any ground breaking information. The experts on this subject are very aware ...

You also seemed to have completely not understood my comment about why 1880

And I don't think you fully looked at that graph or the article linked 

You continue to show how big of an idiot you are on this subject as you desperately flail to tote the political party line 

@calfoxwc said:

so, don't be a dodo bird, woodpecker. Do NOT look at the sun.

But, sunspots occur generally every 11 years? and sunspots warm the earth.

then the earth cools down again.

Upsies and downsies, woodpecker. Not man made global warming crisis nothing.

https://scied.ucar.edu/activity/sunspots-and-climate

Which is exactly what my father told me.... He was a hardcore liberal democrat.. And also was confirmed by friends of mine who are actual scientists..

But, sunspots occur generally every 11 years? and sunspots warm the earth.

then the earth cools down again.

Upsies and downsies, woodpecker. Not man made global warming crisis nothing.

https://scied.ucar.edu/activity/sunspots-and-climate

another graph to make you molt. From Wikipedia

(upsies and downsies ad nauseam)

@mld-woody said:

*fart* peck *fart*

Your simpleton generalizations and attempted insults to do enable you to

make any kind of valid point.

@mld-woody said:

Cal... Our global temp data, at the level of accuracy climatologists are looking for, essentially started in 1880...  That's what that means. 

oh, so it's "accuracy" that is your excuse to ignore the climate changing since the beginning of time on earth?

Let's go back to 2500 B.C. Lookie, lookie Woodpecker ! See the fluctuations?

Upsies? Downsies? Upsies? Downsies?Upsies? Downsies?Upsies? Downsies?

BTW, the "2040" is a terrible typo....

How convenient it is that you like STARTING with 1880 for "accuracy".

http://www.longrangeweather.com/global_temperatures.htm

@mld-woody said:

"NASA IS FULL OF LIBS AND WE CAN'T TRUST THEM"

Jesus you are a full blown cult member. It's fucking NASA and you're sticking your head in the sand to ignore anything that challenges (disproves) your world view. 

Abs then you followed up with more Google search vomiting referencing the same shit you originally posted that's already been addressed 

Yeah and NASA likes getting their annual government grants.. Follow the money you retarded monkey!

@calfoxwc said:

in the fine print, with no link - the first reference is to....the Copernicus Climate Change Service. But other contradictory sources are "biased" to you.

right. Guess what.

Hahahahaha you're fucking idiot. Truly. 

You don't even understand how biased sources work, let along climate change. This data is literally available all over. I posted it from NASA and you felt like questioning that too

Existing on the wrong side of history must just be your comfort area. 

@calfoxwc said:

I suspect there are still obaMao/biden libs in NASA. There is no date I see on the NASA site. Their graph about the ice in Antarctica?

Something is wrong.

• New York Post

  https://nypost.com › 2025 › 05 › 05 › science › antarctic-ice-has-made-a-surprising-rebound-in-mass-scientists-say

  Antarctic ice has made a surprising rebound in mass, scientists say

  May 5, 2025The Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) has shown signs of record-breaking growth after decades of contributing to global sea-level rise — as experts reveal their theories why. A study published in ...
•  
• 

  ScienceBlog.com

  https://scienceblog.com › sciencechina › 2025 › 05 › 04 › antarctic-ice-sheet-records-surprising-mass-gain-after-decade-of-accelerated-loss

  Antarctic Ice Sheet Records Surprising Mass Gain After Decade of ...

  May 4, 2025A comprehensive new study reveals the Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) experienced unexpected mass gain between 2021-2023, temporarily reversing a two-decade trend of accelerating ice loss that had been contributing significantly to global sea level rise. This remarkable shift comes after analysis of 22 years of satellite gravimetry data showing ...
•  

SciTechDaily

https://scitechdaily.com › antarcticas-astonishing-rebound-ice-sheet-grows-for-the-first-time-in-decades

"NASA IS FULL OF LIBS AND WE CAN'T TRUST THEM"

Jesus you are a full blown cult member. It's fucking NASA and you're sticking your head in the sand to ignore anything that challenges (disproves) your world view. 

Abs then you followed up with more Google search vomiting referencing the same shit you originally posted that's already been addressed 

@calfoxwc said:

weather fluctuates. NOTE:

https://plus.nasa.gov/video/2023-was-the-hottest-year-on-record/

https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/ice-sheets/?intent=121

"2023 was Earth’s warmest year since 1880, and the last 10 consecutive years have been the warmest 10 on record. But why does NASA, a space agency, look at Earth’s temperature? And how do we even measure global temperature?"

****************************************

so, it was warmer the year 1880. And 2024 wasn't as warm as the year before.

See? Weather changes all over the place. Trends over centuries go up and down.

Cal... Our global temp data, at the level of accuracy climatologists are looking for, essentially started in 1880...  That's what that means. 

Hilarious to see you talking about weather when you've posted weather countless times to try and disprove climate change 

@mld-woody said:

Overall ice loss in Antarctica with the gain in the OP showed 

in the fine print, with no link - the first reference is to....the Copernicus Climate Change Service. But other contradictory sources are "biased" to you.

right. Guess what.

@mld-woody said:

NASAs latest data, shows the "gains" have basically stopped. Like the actual study mentioned, it was an anomaly, a high precipitation year, which can be driven by increasing temps. 

https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/ice-sheets/?intent=121

I suspect there are still obaMao/biden libs in NASA. There is no date I see on the NASA site. Their graph about the ice in Antarctica?

Something is wrong.

• New York Post

  https://nypost.com › 2025 › 05 › 05 › science › antarctic-ice-has-made-a-surprising-rebound-in-mass-scientists-say

  Antarctic ice has made a surprising rebound in mass, scientists say

  May 5, 2025The Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) has shown signs of record-breaking growth after decades of contributing to global sea-level rise — as experts reveal their theories why. A study published in ...
•  
• 

  ScienceBlog.com

  https://scienceblog.com › sciencechina › 2025 › 05 › 04 › antarctic-ice-sheet-records-surprising-mass-gain-after-decade-of-accelerated-loss

  Antarctic Ice Sheet Records Surprising Mass Gain After Decade of ...

  May 4, 2025A comprehensive new study reveals the Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) experienced unexpected mass gain between 2021-2023, temporarily reversing a two-decade trend of accelerating ice loss that had been contributing significantly to global sea level rise. This remarkable shift comes after analysis of 22 years of satellite gravimetry data showing ...
•  

SciTechDaily

https://scitechdaily.com › antarcticas-astonishing-rebound-ice-sheet-grows-for-the-first-time-in-decades

@mld-woody said:

NASAs latest data, shows the "gains" have basically stopped. Like the actual study mentioned, it was an anomaly, a high precipitation year, which can be driven by increasing temps.

weather fluctuates. NOTE:

https://plus.nasa.gov/video/2023-was-the-hottest-year-on-record/

https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/ice-sheets/?intent=121

"2023 was Earth’s warmest year since 1880, and the last 10 consecutive years have been the warmest 10 on record. But why does NASA, a space agency, look at Earth’s temperature? And how do we even measure global temperature?"

****************************************

so, it was warmer the year 1880. And 2024 wasn't as warm as the year before.

See? Weather changes all over the place. Trends over centuries go up and down.

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/cherry-picked-antarctic-ice-data-does-not-disprove-climate-change-2025-02-11/

@axe said:

Ugh, this one has been brought up many times as well. There's a reason why climatologists talk in terms of volume / mass of ice, not extent. The surface area could extend but the volume / mass of the total ice cover be much, much less. 

Cal has posted many threads pointing out the exact same thing, thinking her actually has something, and like everything else he's posted on climate change, it was quickly disproven 

But sure, great image / meme from your Facebook I guess...

https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/ice-sheets/?intent=121