@orion said:

The Browns are smartly stating that the bottom 5 spots of their roster are usually for developmental players.  Players that kind of rotate in and out.  So, they have no problem keeping 4 QB's on the roster.  Whether or not they actually think having 4 QB's is a problem or not doesn't matter.  They're telling the rest of the league, Hey!  Don't be waiting for us to cut one of them.  Because we are fine with keeping all 4.  

Unless one of the veteran QBs get injured - I'd like to see the Browns use one of them to trade for help in the Secondary. I'm not talking training camp soft tissue injuries/pulls either.

@sdbacker80 said:

Well Fields was sidelined with what amounts as a hangnail 

false alarm

Garland, Mobley and Allen must be his heroes..

false alarm

@sdbacker80 said:

So when does Flacco or Pickett get dealt to the Jets.  
 

they are rolling with Tyrod.

In the words on northeast Ohios great Tim Misny “make them pay”

It'll be interesting to see which one gives the Browns the best exchange value; especially since they may be competing with the Titans to get that done.

@dutch-oven said:

Titans lost Levis for the year too

Who lost who there?  He was so bad that Mason Rudolph was actually relevant...