<![CDATA[Graham Harrell]]>Anyone think of this yet? If we would have kept him in camp, we could legitimately had a great quarterback to use with a lot of talent.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/7333/graham-harrellRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 10:28:25 GMTThu, 01 Oct 2009 16:44:41 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Graham Harrell on Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:46:20 GMT]]>

@beefjerky said:

why does everyone hate Graham Harrell so much? the guy threw for 5,111 yards, 45 touchdowns, and had a 70.6% completion rate in his senior season, you don't think he's any good at all? tell me 3 reasons why he's not good besides him being a "system QB".

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/profile?playerId=160425

Because he played in the spread offense and it's really easy to throw in that offense.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/117109https://brownsboard.com/post/117109Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:46:20 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Graham Harrell on Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:37:19 GMT]]>TBH, I would have liked to have kept Bartel. Bartel looked like he'd make a solid #2 or at least #3 option.

Harrell is just not a good QB. He's a product of the system. See QB's like Timmy Chang, Colt Brennan, Kliff Kingsbury, Cody Hodges, BJ Symons, and Sonny Cumbie.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/117048https://brownsboard.com/post/117048Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:37:19 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Graham Harrell on Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:32:32 GMT]]>

@beefjerky said:

you don't think he's any good at all? tell me 3 reasons why he's not good besides him being a "system QB".

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/profile?playerId=160425

1. Derek Anderson

2. Brady Quinn

3. Brett Ratliff

are all better

What does that tell ya

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/117046https://brownsboard.com/post/117046Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:32:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Graham Harrell on Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:41:44 GMT]]>

@beefjerky said:

why does everyone hate Graham Harrell so much? the guy threw for 5,111 yards, 45 touchdowns, and had a 70.6% completion rate in his senior season, you don't think he's any good at all? tell me 3 reasons why he's not good besides him being a "system QB".

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/profile?playerId=160425

Well WE dont have to tell you anything. How many picks are in the draft? 256? Something like that...... So there is 256 reasons and on top of it who else besides our dysfunctional franchise gave him a look?

And you already noted the reason why. Believe what you want to believe but I could throw for 5,000 in that offense. 😆

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/117009https://brownsboard.com/post/117009Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:41:44 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Graham Harrell on Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:36:55 GMT]]>btw, Quinn's last season at Notre Dame:

3,426 yards 37 TD and 61.9% completion rate, he was never meant to be very good.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/117006https://brownsboard.com/post/117006Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:36:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Graham Harrell on Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:36:18 GMT]]>

@beefjerky said:

why does everyone hate Graham Harrell so much? the guy threw for 5,111 yards, 45 touchdowns, and had a 70.6% completion rate in his senior season, you don't think he's any good at all? tell me 3 reasons why he's not good besides him being a "system QB".

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/profile?playerId=160425

Because he is Tim Couch light when you remove him from a rediculous spread offense that only works in college.

There is a reason no team drafted him or signed him even to a practice squad. He's now in the CFL.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/117005https://brownsboard.com/post/117005Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:36:18 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Graham Harrell on Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:33:07 GMT]]>why does everyone hate Graham Harrell so much? the guy threw for 5,111 yards, 45 touchdowns, and had a 70.6% completion rate in his senior season, you don't think he's any good at all? tell me 3 reasons why he's not good besides him being a "system QB".

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/player/profile?playerId=160425

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/117002https://brownsboard.com/post/117002Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:33:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Graham Harrell on Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:07:45 GMT]]>

@theclevelandsound said:

Anyone think of this yet? If we would have kept him in camp, we could legitimately had a great quarterback to use with a lot of talent.

I hope you are joking.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/116993https://brownsboard.com/post/116993Thu, 01 Oct 2009 19:07:45 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Graham Harrell on Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:50:22 GMT]]>

@lumbergh said:

well you know shep said he had the "sickest" stats he'd ever seen. Like 50 TDs and 8 picks.

Good lookin kid too....so he's got the "it factor" goin for him.

🙄 He was talking about Bradford

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/116860https://brownsboard.com/post/116860Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:50:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Graham Harrell on Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:48:46 GMT]]>

@theclevelandsound said:

Anyone think of this yet? If we would have kept him in camp, we could legitimately had a great quarterback to use with a lot of talent.

well you know shep said he had the "sickest" stats he'd ever seen. Like 50 TDs and 8 picks.

Good lookin kid too....so he's got the "it factor" goin for him.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/116857https://brownsboard.com/post/116857Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:48:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Graham Harrell on Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:47:32 GMT]]>not even close.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/116856https://brownsboard.com/post/116856Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:47:32 GMT