<![CDATA[Opponant Adjusted Stats]]>Some of you remember the last couple of years I had the WPBDawgFan Rankings...with emphasis on opponent wins and losses to calculate out how a team was really ranked. Well, I got tired of that and have moved on to something a little more challenging. I just completed the offensive rankings. Below is the adjusted yards for each team.

The formula is this:

(Total Opponent Yards - Total Team Yards)/(Total Opponent Games - Total Team Games) x Team Average Yards

By doing this, it adjusts your yards to reflect how you are doing in comparison to other teams in the league against the same defenses. Anyway...it isn't flawless, but it IS interesting:

        Rush    Pass     Total
Ari     31.8    256.6   288.4
Atl     69.7    217.7   287.4
Bal    169.7    397.0   566.6
Buf    166.5    145.9   312.4
Car     79.8    155.1   234.9
Chi     37.6    336.7   374.4
Cin    147.3    190.4   337.7
Cle     67.8    110.6   178.4
Dal    252.0    356.3   608.3
Den    186.2    200.6   386.8
Det    122.4    164.9   287.3
GB      99.1    176.7   275.8
Hou     57.8    318.2   376.0
Ind     92.6    442.4   535.1
Jax    121.3    163.7   285.1
KC      95.1    123.8   218.9
Mia    214.5    105.0   319.5
Min    188.8    102.9   291.7
NE     102.3    406.8   509.1
NO     355.2    324.4   679.6
NYG    140.2    270.2   410.4
NYJ    150.9    138.2   289.1
Oak     90.2     65.2   155.4
Phi    113.3    346.2   459.5
Pit     80.7    313.3   393.9
SD      42.8    508.8   551.6
Sea    127.1    263.4   390.6
SF     125.1    117.7   242.8
StL     98.9    119.4   218.3
TB      55.8    193.7   249.5
Ten    213.8    193.1   406.9
Was     58.2    305.3   363.5

I am sure you can see we are the 2nd worst passing offense, and the 7th worst rushing offense. 2nd worst overall behind Oakland.

OUCH!!!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/7377/opponant-adjusted-statsRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 07:43:10 GMTFri, 02 Oct 2009 21:00:29 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Opponant Adjusted Stats on Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:32:39 GMT]]>

@danamal said:

John I really do respect your dedication to statistics and numbers but can you work on one where we dont suck so bad?

Kinda like this

I have to say...that is one of the funniest scenes. Always loved it!!!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/117864https://brownsboard.com/post/117864Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:32:39 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Opponant Adjusted Stats on Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:06:37 GMT]]>

@danamal said:

Kinda like this

Classic. "What's the matter with you? That's terrible news!!"

LMAO!

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/117841https://brownsboard.com/post/117841Fri, 02 Oct 2009 22:06:37 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Opponant Adjusted Stats on Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:45:25 GMT]]> I am sure you can see we are the 2nd worst passing offense, and the 7th worst rushing offense. 2nd worst overall behind Oakland.

OUCH!!!

Nice work. But I think we all knew that we sucked. I am actually surprised that we are better than somone.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/117820https://brownsboard.com/post/117820Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:45:25 GMT