<![CDATA[3-4 SUCKS]]>Is it just me but has the defense got progressively worse since the browns went to a 3-4 defense. Would be interested to see browns numbers 4-3 versus 3-4 and league 4-3 v 3-4.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/topic/7389/3-4-sucksRSS for NodeThu, 01 Oct 2026 23:39:25 GMTSat, 03 Oct 2009 05:50:55 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to 3-4 SUCKS on Sat, 03 Oct 2009 15:17:55 GMT]]>We have the defensive tackles but nothing else for a 4/3. All of our linebackers save DQ are too slow for a 4/3. Maybe Wimbley would be a nice DE but might be too light in the pants.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/118114https://brownsboard.com/post/118114Sat, 03 Oct 2009 15:17:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 3-4 SUCKS on Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:38:40 GMT]]>I'll never get why we still play3-4 with no talent for it. We'd be much better in a 4-3 since we have two great interior Dlinemen (ROgers and Williams) and OLBs who would benefit from more pressure up front.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/118074https://brownsboard.com/post/118074Sat, 03 Oct 2009 13:38:40 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 3-4 SUCKS on Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:56:32 GMT]]>With the talent we have and the great playcalling daboll has been making the nfl could allow us to start 14 guys on both sides of the ball and it wouldnt make much difference...

The 3-4 is a great defense if you have the right personel we do not have the right people ive said it before we would be better off going 4-3 until we get the right players to make a 3-4 work right..

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/118063https://brownsboard.com/post/118063Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:56:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 3-4 SUCKS on Sat, 03 Oct 2009 09:29:32 GMT]]>3-4 defenses usually dominate the league in sack leaders. In 2007 Jason Taylor, Ware, Merrimam, Harrisson all led the league in sacks & QB Pressures.

]]>https://brownsboard.com/post/118042https://brownsboard.com/post/118042Sat, 03 Oct 2009 09:29:32 GMT