Former QB, excellent feet, and incredible hands on short routes. Will be a very interesting short route runner for DA taking people away from Masso. I'm excited for this.

@brownindian said:

Bet the jet fans are excited about getting BE and watching sanchez's passer rating drop through the floor....muhahahaha!

I think stuckey is what this team needs desperately he is fast ,has fast response ,has some moves and good hands however at 6' i really hope mangini doesnt try to replace edwards with stuckey..MoMass would likely be more effective at the slot 1 inexperienced or not..

Now that BE is in NY he will probably catch everything within a mile of him...hehehehe

As far as who got the best of the deal...it depends on if BE produces for the jets or if stuckey produces for us and what mankok does with the 3rd & 5th round picks and from what ive seen i tend to think we already got the better end of the stick with stuckey because edwards was close to useless here at least stuckey likely will produce with quick pops over the middle...

Edwards should be happy in NYC but he is a bitch so he wont be long...

@mopaji said:

He's not a better fit per se because he isn't replacing Edwards, he's presumably replacing Furrey (in a related topic, maybe Furrey will go back to safety full-time now????). I understand the difference between Madden and real football, mo. I'm just not sure that Stuckey replaces Edwards in any significant way. We are noow counting on two rookies to be our outside threats, one of which (Robiskie) may or not be an NFL receiver.

And that's all you expect from Stuckey?? JUST 43 first downs???????? Not 100? Funny....

That game was awesome!

Doug

@vegasdogg said:

Didn't he do that agaisnt the GMen last year?

@brownindian said:

and they were talking about how Stuckey drops easy passes!

@.mz said:

Edwards did have 1300 yards and 16 TD's in 2007. Stuckey might not reach those numbers for his career.

He may not be better than BE in Madden but for this team he's a better fit. He'll get his 60 catches and 5 TDs every year. 43 of those catches being for first downs with about an 8yd average. That's all he he needs to do here.

@car-ramrod said:

Braylon helped but Mo caught some balls with a safety over the top so I don't think he'll have trouble with safety help. I saw the kid take a shot in preseason on a slant and hung onto it. Also, one of his catches last week was between a corner and a fast approaching safety. He made the catch first, and then ducked. The kid is tough and he has great hands. He'll be fine. He has a number 1 WR's build and skill set. He was drafted to be the guy. I was just hoping it wouldn't be this soon. But oh well, they did what they had to do. But MM wil be fine.

@.mz said:

And 17 drops.

"Sanchez finds Edwards wide open over the top and......oh it fell right between his hands! Pass incomplete, 4th down coming up."

"New Browns wideout Chancy Stuckey was relatively ineffective in his browns debut catching 2 balls for 12 yards with one drop"

@mopaji said:

Receivers who catch. Right. That's the ticket.

Let's just hope DA doesn't do him the discourtesy of hitting him in the face with a ball on a square out.

@samoth said:

He will not be as good considering Braylon is not on the team anymore. If he is the #1 he will more than likely get shutout.

@.mz said:

Edwards did have 1300 yards and 16 TD's in 2007. Stuckey might not reach those numbers for his career.

Of course we are

Stuckey'll be fine in the slot, but we're not really feeding ourselves this line of bullshit, are we?

Edwards did have 1300 yards and 16 TD's in 2007. Stuckey might not reach those numbers for his career.

@shepwrite said:

"Stuckey is was our number 2 receiver (but would be a number 3 on any other team). The guy is young (3rd year) and extremely hard worker with great character. As a slot receiver, he's going to be really good."

They could prep him to take over for Furrey next year. I hope it means we will see Cribbs in the backfield more and less at WR.

@shepwrite said:

somebody's gotta be the #2 in Cleveland, probably will be Stuckey.

@ithika said:

What are you smoking? Braylon sucked.

@mopaji said:

I think he is more of a slot guy. Sure he plays the #2 in NY (and kind of the #3 at times). Stuckey wasn't able to stretch the field like NY needed because they had to rely on him to do so...their #1 Cotchery couldn't. Our new #1 (assuming) Mo Mass CAN do that. So it's actually a better fit for Stuckey in Cleveland. Cotchery is great but not that kind of WR. He'll benefit from BE stretching the field too.

Good move for both teams in terms of using WR as strengths in their system. Getting picks on top of that makes it nice too. It'll be interesting to see how we use/line up our WR core now...

@oconrecon said:

This is true he can't stretch the field constantly but we already have that guy in Mo Mass. I think that's what he was brought in to do. What Stucky does do is CATCH. He's the prototypical #2 WR. I love this move. also.